Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Club fundraising #322117
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    See Tamworth have a new rich owner.

    24 year old? must have crossed the channel in a small boat and threw his passport away.

    He crossed the Atlantic.. Young American real estate investor…

    Excellent news for Tamworth FC … these ‘ rich people ‘ are out there its just finding one who wants to buy / invest in Scunny

    What’s he see in Tamworth that we don’t have?
    Question: Are our current directors actively seeking new major investments, or is this, and unending sponsorship our lot?

    Maybe he has family and/or business links to Tamworth?

    in reply to: Transfer news sponsor #322053
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    And a convicted one at that, served his time though, and we all deserve that second chance.

    Second chance? Mr 4 names…..

    Operating as a Director, using different names, when he was banned from being a Director for 6 years?

    That’s really taking your second chance isn’t it!!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Fifa World Cup #321909
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Haiti also dived all over the place looking for a penalty, but never got booked for it.

    They were strong and physical and that was about it.

    Not a good side, although they did wallop New Zealand 4-0.

    in reply to: Fifa World Cup #321907
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Gutted for Haiti. If they had any kind of end product that could well have been a draw. Scotland were very poor.

    Yes, and if Scotland had 2 fantastic strikers and a quality keeper they may have won 6-0.

    And if your mother had balls she’d have been your da’

    in reply to: Fifa World Cup #321888
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Only watched the YouTube eight to nine minute highlights so far, kick off times being unreasonable.
    The winning teams seem very incisive in using the wings.

    Same here .. extended highlights only as KO times are dreadful ..

    US and Korea looked tasty.

    Jocks tomorrow morning 8am KO i MAY MAY tune in as i cut the grass today so tomorrow morning is free.

    I shall be going to sleep in an hour or so & getting up at 1.30 to watch the mighty (?) Scotland. Back to bed @ 4.30 and then for a round of golf @ 7.30.

    3-1 to the boys in blue ❤️

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Fifa World Cup #321751
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Morocco and Ecuador to surprise.

    England to disappoint.

    Scotland to fail in style.

    Hopefully Brazil win it, but probably Spain or France.

    I too have little interest…….

    in reply to: First Iron player younger than you #321675
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Who was the first player to make his Iron first team debut who was younger than you? Loanees excluded. As far as I can tell and recall, mine was Neil Pointon.

    It’s going to be a bloody long close season, isn’t it?

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Club fundraising #321673
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Surely Positive Dave as to be that person.
    Arm round the incoming player with that thumb in the air photo, so he can show it to his family that means more to him than any football club. Or is that the Carlsberg advert.

    Any football club is correct.

    Sadly, it seems to be our turn to have him!!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: There’s plenty out there #321589
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Change your tune there 64 Roberts was the dogs bollocks according to you our best player with Ewing not far behind.

    The best if a bad lot? Doesn’t mean they are really good players – although, to be fair, Roberts was very good.

    in reply to: Positivity v Negativity #321381
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    I’m with Stu 👍

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Have we made ANY signings yet? #321305
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    What just like Matlock have.

    Totally different circumstances, and we aren’t talking about Matlock are we.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Have we made ANY signings yet? #321302
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    But at least we had the players.

    But not for long. We’d have gone out of business pretty damned quickly if he’d stayed.

    in reply to: Goals!! #321286
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    I think the interesting thing with the goals discussion is that most people are understandably focusing on replacing Roberts, but for me the bigger issue is actually what happens in midfield if Roberts, Westbrooke and Ewing all leave.

    Roberts is the obvious headline loss because you’re talking about goals, assists, set pieces and somebody who could win a game out of absolutely nothing. You don’t replace that easily at National League level.

    But I’d argue Westbrooke and Ewing leaving together could be just as damaging to the overall team.

    Westbrooke gave us control. Ewing gave us physicality and balance. One helped us play, the other helped us compete. Take both out and suddenly you’re not just replacing players, you’re replacing the platform the team was built on.

    Looking at the season as a whole, I actually don’t think scoring goals was our biggest problem. We scored 77 in the league which is more than enough to be competing at the right end. The concern is we conceded 62. York and Rochdale were down around the low 40s. That’s a massive gap. We were already too easy to play against at times and too many games became basketball matches.

    Roberts could get away with that because he could produce moments that won games. If he’s gone, you can’t just rely on having another shootout every week.

    For me the recruitment priorities are:

    1. A creative midfielder who can dictate games
    2. A genuine goalscoring wide player
    3. A defensive midfielder with legs and presence
    4. A commanding centre-half

    I actually think the central midfield rebuild is more important than replacing Roberts directly. Without Westbrooke and Ewing there’s a danger we become a side that works hard, runs around a lot and competes physically, but struggles to control games.

    Butler deserves a lot of credit because a newly promoted side finishing 5th and reaching the play-off semi-final is a very good season. But if we want to move from being a play-off side to an automatic promotion side, we need to become harder to score against and better at controlling matches, not just find another winger and hope he scores 20 goals.

    The positive is that I genuinely think we’re closer than some people think. The negative is that replacing Roberts, Westbrooke, and Ewing properly is probably the biggest recruitment challenge Butler has faced since taking over.

    I can’t agree that we scored enough goals. We did early on in the season, but we stalled badly in the new year.

    Butler did better than many expected last season, but he will have one hell of a job next season and I’m still not convinced he is up to it.

    As posted earlier, we need goals form defenders, midfielders & strikers. That’s a lot to find in a single close season.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Have we made ANY signings yet? #321285
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Surely the “proof” is that Yeovil announced a signing of a player we’d had on loan all season, but we’ve said nothing about not re-signing him?

    That’s not proof the club knew he was joining Yeovil,it’s proof he is joining Yeovil only

    Do you think he went to the Iron and said I’m negotiating with Yeovil while he has an offer on the table?

    Might just have done so.
    If he thought we might increase our offer.
    So far we’ve “allowed” two to escape, but signed no one.
    Bargain basement again?

    It’s not even the end of May yet. Lots of clubs will lose players in the coming weeks, but will not sign others until they have gone. Many contracts run until end June as well.

    We don’t have a very good record of getting in players early, but it is somewhat unfair to start haranguing them so early.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Have we made ANY signings yet? #321260
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    He went back to his registered club at the end of his loan.

    Why would we comment on not signing a player??

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Westbrooke to Yeovil #321259
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Yes, we over achieved, and next season may not be as good. However, the big problem is that it is a massive risk taking on new investors/owners. To say our record at doing that is poor is a huge understatement!!

    I don’t think that I could go through it a third time 🫣🫣🫣

    in reply to: Best wing men over the last 25 years #321210
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Beagrie was awesome.

    A 4-0 win at Exeter on a beautiful Saturday afternoon was probably his best performance.

    We played like Brazil that day.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: England World Cup Squad. #321088
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Pretty sure he did travel again.
    Need to check

    Banks was at the 1970 World Cup but he still had both of his eyes.

    No need to check.

    in reply to: England World Cup Squad. #321076
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Even Alf Ramsey made odd choices: taking Gordon Banks in 1970 when he’d lost an eye?

    Banks lost his eye in October 1972.

    Good story Alky, but not true

    in reply to: VAR #321056
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    The proponents of VAR claimed it would remove controversy from the game and that football was worse with contentious, on the spot, refereeing decisions. With the amount of admitted wrong VAR calls, I don’t see how this can be the case.

    A review has concluded that the last minute penalty awarded to Celtic in their game against Motherwell should not have been given and this cost Hearts the title. There is a lot of skepticism towards the neutrality of the authorities in Scotland from non-Old Firm fans and this has really added to the conspiracy. I have to say, with good reason given the peculiar calls over there.

    Far from removing controversy, it has added to it. Sure, we have other things like social media that have ramped up conspiracism, but it has only got worse with VAR. Before, people could say the refs had a short time to make a decision; sure, there were bias claims, but there were mitigating factors that made people think it wasn’t so overt. Now, we have VAR being inconsistent and people will see it as a conspiracy to favour certain teams because they have to take time to arrive at their decision; the scope for error is assumed to be lower.

    VAR just ruins celebrations, delays the game and does not bring an end to controversy from discussions over decisions, as was the claimed need for it. It’s true that much of this is because of the humans that use the technology, but it has been consistently poor and not just in the UK. Last world cup, I remember a dubious penalty given to Argentina when 1-0 down to Poland after losing the first game to Saudi Arabia, and comments online were “got to get Messi his world cup, so can’t have them going out of the group stage.”

    You cannot define a season on one incident.

    Whilst the penalty for Celtic may have been wrong, there was an even worse decision in the Hearts v Hibs game, which meant Hearts went on to win the game. You could say it cost Celtic the title!!

    The reality is that VAR mistakes are made in too many matches and with the widespread TV coverage it gets played time and time again.

    The nearer to the end of the season, or a k/o competition, the worse the controversy becomes.

    It is my belief that if the players stopped cheating it would make the referees job much easier.

    I also believe that the referee should be left to run the game and that linesmen should contribute more.

    in reply to: Saints #321055
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Probably an apt time to remind everyone what the SFA did to Rangers all those years ago.

    Rangers cheating was over many years and was huge in terms of the financial scale for Scotland.

    Whilst they got punted down the leagues, they should have been made to start on the ground floor as they came back as a different club altogether.

    If it had been any other Scottish club they would definitely have been chucked out of the League completely.

    in reply to: If we could? #320881
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    He can’t be as good as that write up if Gillingham are letting him go.

    Did his Mum do the write up?

    in reply to: Mahady #320512
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Unless I’m missing something, he’s saying goodbye because his loan has come to an end following the conclusion of the campaign and he’s under contract at Leeds United until 2028…

    Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story 😉

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Rochdale #320315
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Would Butler have done better this season with a budget comparable to York and Dale? I think so. I’d wager fans of those two clubs have criticised their managers over the season. But they had a better player budget and their superior quality trumped every other team in the end.

    You still need a good manager to ensure that the budget is used wisely and to play the right players with the best tactics.

    Having a big budget doesn’t always work – as we know!!

    in reply to: Playoffs going to plan so far… #320314
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    If it’s more about budgets how can Boreham Wood be going to Wembley?

    Yes, budgets play a part. But so do managers. Our manager must take responsibility for what happens on the pitch – after all, he picks the team & the subs.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Playoffs going to plan so far… #320263
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    So much for playing like we did against Southend……

    in reply to: Billy Sharp #320237
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    The man is a Legend.

    He was 100% committed every time he stepped on to the pitch & a great goal scorer.

    5 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Scunthorpe Utd v Southend Utd Play Off Eliminator #320041
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    If we play at Rochdale on Sunday as well as we did last night, we have a good chance.

    We pressed, we bombarded, we bullied.

    Why the hell haven’t we been doing this all season?

    It’s also much more fun to watch than the garbage we’ve been served up recently.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Butler,the best manager we never loved #319837
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Selective memory again BPG. Laws did a good job, but he did fade towards the end and outstayed his welcome.

    As for Butler, yes we scored a lot of goals pre Christmas – were riding high. Recently, we have been shocking and are certainly not the form team for the playoffs.

    When I stated that we were not scoring enough goals 6 weeks ago I was harangued by a good few on here that it was not a scoring problem, and we had scored a lot of goals. It was that we were conceding too many.

    The reality is that for the last few months we have scored far too few goals and conceded too many. Yes we scored early on, but that hasn’t helped us recently.

    We are not good enough and it is unlikely that we will go up.

    Supporting the team all the way, but more in hope than expectation.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Wealdstone #319690
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    I didn’t think Butler should have been appointed in the first place. However, despite the fact that I don’t like him (and I loved him as a player), he has done a decent job. That said, he does not conduct himself well, he has made many a mistake with major positions – keeper, strikers, wingers – but we are still in a position to go up.

    Personally, I think we should be going with a full team for the rest of the season. We need to get the positivity flowing.