Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
The share builder scheme was definitely put to members for views. I remember replying to say that I supported it.
1 user thanked author for this post.
It seems that for as long as I can remember we have had issues with our many suppliers-either in terms of quality or timeliness of delivery, or sometimes both. Might we be doing something wrong?
I have no issue with what the Trust does and has done in terms of charitable donations and associated fund-raising.
I don’t think club curated content for the “Insiders” extends to updates on bad news.
Any information from the Insiders ?
I gather the replica shirts are expected to arrive by tomorrow in time for the gala day and Legends match. If that expectation is realised and they are on sale in the club shop on Sunday, then that may help recover any revenue lost from the late arrival. There will be a hardcore who buy the shirt regardless of the design.
Thank you. Sadly, the harvest from my plums and their condition has been steadily declining in recent years. I dare say with some gentle and expert handling, this trend could be reversed. 🙏
Demonstrates precisely why we need to use a non de plume on here.
Sorry to hear your trees didn’t yield much fruit this year.
We were awash with plumbs from our trees.This is all very unlike the Trust and how it is operated historically. I am particularly surprised that a £500 donation appears to have been made from Trust funds without prior consultation with the membership. I can only assume that this was agreed by the Trust Board. Personally, I would favour a blue plaque-perhaps in the town at the front of the Baths.
In my opinion they ought to ask those who donate to the appeal what they want. Though I know that may not be possible due to some anonymous donors no doubt. In which case, ask the membership. Two or three options would probably suffice.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Demonstrates precisely why we need to use a non de plume on here.
Great article. Essential reading for all Iron fans, fans’ reps and Directors. Let’s hope its call is heeded.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I am ambivalent about the statue. In theory, it’s a great idea. If the money can be raised to get a good job done, I’d support it. Without being churlish, I’d like to know a little more about the what and how, though. It will be interesting to see what the club says after meeting with the Trust reps.
On the chant idea for the seventh minute, I don’t want anything to do with such performative nonsense and a half arsed singing of “he’s one of our own.” (It always makes me cringe). A respectful and contemplative minute’s silence is a far better way to mourn the loss of KK.
Now I see people suggesting nonsense about the 7th minute of a game and chanting a song.Why do we have to be seen to do something all the time?
I had my 1982-83 Hobbot shirt before the season started.
The decision to move away from Kelme was driven by the club’s desire to secure a “bespoke, community-focused kit design and a specialised terrace culture fashion range.
That would be an obvious explanation. The design was also informed by fan feedback.
Ordered them earlier?
Have we ever had a supplier with which the club and fans were happy? I see that Hartlepool’s Meyba manufactured kits are available and on sale. What have they done differently?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Our new replica kits were due to have arrived and be on sale by the end of last week. A cursory bit of research reveals that most NL clubs have theirs released and on sale. Assuming that it is an important and major source of revenue to the club, it’s not good enough. Fans weren’t consulted on design because of the imperative to get kits on sale at an early point.
The worst news. My childhood hero. RIP King Kev.
4 users thanked author for this post.
Come on. You’re better than that.
I was against the principle of having an unelected group appointed by the club. But the minutes of the last meeting show an ability and willingness to take up important issues. It is not their fault that the club has failed to (consistently at least): meet frequently, field a Director, or to publicise when meetings have taken place. Aren’t these similar issues faced by the Trust? The club doesn’t seem to be taking it seriously.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Bumping this in the light of the reference to VoF in the interview with the Club Chair and General Manager.
July 10, 2026 at 5:42 pm in reply to: Iron Hour interview with Michelle Harness and James Moody #322963Absolutely. You wouldn’t and shouldn’t treat employees like this and expect high motivation, commitment, engagement and performance in response. So what would you expect from “customers” or fans when you don’t seek and take account of their views?
2 users thanked author for this post.
July 10, 2026 at 3:51 pm in reply to: Iron Hour interview with Michelle Harness and James Moody #322958Some personal reflections on the interview:
Positive
• Additional investment in playing budget.
• John Staff’s legacy recognised with planned display of large club shirt collection, albeit not accessible to all fans.
• Stability and apparent closeness of playing, management, board and backroom staff.Negative
• A complete failure to see or value the role of fans and fans’ groups as an important channel for consultation and engagement on important matters.
• By extension, lack of preparedness for compliance with the IFR requirements on fan engagement.
• Additional revenue streams needed to fund additional investment and residual historic debt. Surely, we will enter the realms of diminishing returns associated with current initiatives to bring in more income.
• A reluctance to bring in additional major shareholders/investors.Sadly, it looks like the approach of give us your money, but don’t expect any say in the running of the club will continue. That is really disappointing from a self-styled community club owned by four fans. Sadly, the inability to understand, recognise and respond to fan sentiment and views is likely lead to more and greater missteps. I hope I am wrong and we can look forward to a prosperous season off the field and a successful one on it.
3 users thanked author for this post.
I feel no less of a supporter. The language and presentation of this particular scheme is the issue for me. What it offers is not of huge interest. I can live without club curated interviews and access to behind the scenes footage.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Perhaps everyone would be a receptive to this initiative if we were shown club accounts, plans and finances in an open and transparent way. Of course, it’s a choice for people to make, but the notion that you are, by definition, a lower caste of fan if you don’t is particularly offensive.
The info about Beestin was free on the BBC sounds interview with Butler last night, whats the problem with you guys no one is forcing anyone to pay for anything except the match fee, its a free world do what you want but if there are people who want to pay/sponsor then great as it all helps the club no matter what it is and it means we can carry on supporting our team
1 user thanked author for this post.
A business can sponsor your seat (sticker on the back facing the seat behind) without your consent, whereas you can opt to pay to personalise your own seat with a sticker on the front. The business advertising on seats is odd. Who is going to see the sticker other than a few people sitting in the row behind?
I referenced somewhere that John Staff once stopped me to say the claret on my 1950s replica shirt was incorrect. But I certainly wasn’t slagging him off. I respected and admired his knowledge and the fact he cared about these things.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Never has there been a faster descent from a heightened state of anticipation and excitement into a condition of self-loathing and disappointment i.e. in the time between reading the subject heading and opening this thread. I am now going for a lengthy session of self flagellation.
I am not someone who buys or wears shirts, but I thought the club was supposed to consult with fans on their design. The away shirt is an improvement on last season’s home kit, which was the worst ever imo. The associated news item on the web site is now live and is a masterclass in how to slaughter the English language.
https://www.scunthorpe-united.co.uk/news/2026/july/2026-27-home-and-away-kits-launched
Those dark arts would have been instilled at an early age.
I stand corrected. That’s not what the various profiles I found said.
Why? Can’t work out the question to which his signing is the answer. Am I missing something? Alty let him go in January and he has barely kicked a ball at Macc.
He played 25 times for Macc since January scoring 8 goals. Not exactly an inspiring signing but how does that fit your definition of barely kicking a ball?
Just saw that. No thanks. What next?
It looks like this has gone down very badly with Shrimpers’ fans. This one is typical:
“Ripping off fans who have forked out for season tickets and 3 friendlies not to mention the overpriced Aveley game…If the board members dont have the money to support the team then they need to resign and get someone in who can. Rather go and watch Chelmsford for my £10 a month.”
It has a familiar feel.
-
AuthorPosts