Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Agreed!
You may be better served disassociating yourselves (the Unity Group) from those sorts of threats and online comments then because at least one of your group and members of Iron Hour seem happy to court it, or turn a blind eye to it.
Understood. I believe one of our more notorious “fans” (i.e. no stranger to HMPs) has been banding such threats about in the last 24 hours.
Nicknames are fine. Can’t wait to hear.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Go on, then. Who are the offenders?
I dont need to name names. Plus they all hide behind online nik names.
If you’re going to chuck around accusations about toxic fans, why not name them? I would hate to think that anyone who asks questions or makes points that seek to speak truth to power is being labelled “toxic.” Many on here will have contributed significantly-both in terms of time of time and money-to support the club in coming back from brink and prospering on the field.
There was no fight . A heated discussion at best. I cant divulge the reason as its a private matter.
There are maybe 6 toxic fans who make unfounded accusations on a regular basis.
. If you would like to attend a committee meeting to address your concerns you are more than welcome .That’s fair. When I have been to Alty and West Didsbury & Chorlton, the songs have been far more inventive than you hear at league and ex-league grounds.
‘it’s a damning indictment of the modern game imo.’
I think that’s a bit general. More EFL and ex-EFL clubs in my experience. There are numerous non league clubs below us with a rich canon of amusing and inventive songs and and chants. Often self deprecating. Though they tend to be more left wing, liberal fan bases.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I know the lad means well and some people seem to like it. Sadly, it seems to have established itself as a club endorsed “good thing.” The canon of chants and songs was far richer and more inventive in days of yore and some of that is down to the drum. If we need that to get an atmosphere going, it’s a damning indictment of the modern game imo.
2 users thanked author for this post.
March 26, 2026 at 6:14 pm in reply to: Howe Can We Not Integrate A Proven Goalscorer In To Our Team? #318383March 26, 2026 at 12:10 pm in reply to: Howe Can We Not Integrate A Proven Goalscorer In To Our Team? #318350I am not suggesting any dressing room shenanigans (and this remains no more than speculation) should be public knowledge. However, that doesn’t stop us puzzling over why a no-brainer decision (i.e. recalling Howe) isn’t being enacted.
1 user thanked author for this post.
March 26, 2026 at 9:42 am in reply to: Howe Can We Not Integrate A Proven Goalscorer In To Our Team? #318339A big test of Butler’a character and development as a leader. If something has gone on between him and Howe, he needs to sort it and get him back. I suspect Howe being hooked against Horsham was the flashpoint for any discord. Then again, Butler seemed to be lukewarm about him from the outset by repeatedly referring to it being his first season as a full time pro.
He’s in contract, he’s had a great season. Get him back.
If Farrell’s loan is not extended, Butler confirmed he has contingency plans. “We’ve got players out there who are on loan, who we can call back. We’ve got a plan B, C and D,” he said.”
Mmmmmm? Who could he mean?
2 users thanked author for this post.
I can live with the increase if it helps to cover running costs without recourse to begging bowl initiatives such as the one for the pitch renovations.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Do we really have too many non-playing staff? I thought that aspect was very lean. In fact, the lack of expertise in some areas is linked to the foundation needed to progress.
It’s not hard to see why we can’t meet the running costs, they employ to many non playing staff.
We expected and wanted change when Swanny left, it started to happen but the new owners had other ideas.
Amongst other things, Butler needs PR training. It comes across as immature and petty. He’s 42, so the young and inexperienced card has now expired. As you say, he should rise above it.
Butler has done a good job on the pitch, but he has a lot to learn with how to deal with fans of the club. It’s bizarre; he seems to treat anyone who says anything negative as the enemy.
Yes, some have gone overboard before with OTT criticism that have been proven wrong at times, but they are entitled to air their opinion and repeated jibes at them makes him sound prickly and insecure. It makes people want to stick it to him when form declines, as it did recently, through annoyance, so it serves a negative feedback loop for him. Such hyperbolic criticism from them is best ignored by him. Also, his arguments don’t leave leeway for constructive criticism, which he makes sound like it’s unwelcome.
Positivity Dave and the unity group are welcomed by Butler and the club because they give unwavering support no matter what. This may be preferred by the club because it is seen as nice and they can be surrounded by positive thought, but it insulates them. It creates a bubble. Sometimes we all need to hear scepticism to avoid mistakes. That is before we go into the divisive nature of some of these people, like Stuart Maw and Max Bell, who have stoked division, behind their curated image of just being positive about the club, by hurling unjust accusations against others and engaging in questionable social media habits.
This is so on the nail. 👏
One of the clearest signs of weak leadership is the need to be surrounded by yes-men. The moment someone only welcomes praise and treats criticism as disloyalty, they stop learning, stop growing, and start disappearing into their own ego.
History is full of examples of powerful figures brought undone by flattery, arrogance, and an inability to hear uncomfortable truths. Even in ancient Rome, there was a tradition during a triumph for a voice behind the victorious leader to remind him of his mortality and limits, often rendered as “remember you are mortal.” The point was simple: power, applause, and self-importance have a way of distorting judgment if nobody is willing to bring you back to reality.
Butler would do well to remember that surrounding yourself with sycophants may protect your ego, but it usually comes at the expense of wisdom, credibility, and sound judgment.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Spot on. The apparent failure to see that most critical feedback comes from a place of deep commitment to the club is worrying.
Does all this ‘positivity’ allow for any critical thinking whatsoever? I’m all for being positive but if doesn’t allow any questioning, it’s not healthy.
I think fans would be more supportive of and sympathetic to this if:
• there was full transparency about the current finances and why we can’t meet the running costs from normal revenue streams;
• there had been proper consultation with fans about the idea;
• there was a clear plan to make us financially sustainable at this level as well as prepared for operating in the EFL.Personally, I am quite happy about league position and don’t think we are ready for League 2. What’s more important is to build foundations for further progression. At the moment it feels like we are still working in the survival mode that was necessary when the current regime took over. I may be wrong, but at the moment I see no evidence of a long term plan.
If it helps then why not ?
Do not understand the resentment. Remember they are still reducing the outstanding debt and also a budget that has us in the play-offs.
When that ‘Lottery’ winner steps forward to clear the nightmare and officially resets the club with a plus balance anything has to be considered.
Helpful trigger warning. Apart from Butler going off on this weird and unnecessary tangent in the first place, what was he seeking to achieve?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Please, say this isn’t so. 🤮
March 15, 2026 at 1:28 pm in reply to: Abibliophobia On The Pros & Cons Of Promotion – Do You Want Promotion? #317572The questions for me are more about whether or not have the foundations and, under the current ownership, a sustainable model financially? As a minimum, we need a complete overhaul of the pitch, our own ground staff as well as security over the future of our training ground. That’s before you think about the playing budget and re-establishing an academy. I would be as delighted as anyone if we got promoted this season, though I think it remains improbable. My worry would be that we are simply not ready to sustain League 2 football.
I would love to know more about the current financial position. Accounts should soon be filed for 2024-25 and I hope we get an update from the club then.
No.
Wealthier owners or additional opulent owners needed.
Current squad is sub standard.
A complete squad overhaul would be required for L2
Could the current owners finance that … outright … or … with more loans?
It’d be like trying to nail jelly to a wall in L2.
Consolidate, strengthen, continue rebuilding.
If we’re still selling scratch cards and having bucket collections – then we aren’t L2 quality.
Thoughts?1 user thanked author for this post.
Agreed. I hate to say it, but it may be a few more seasons before we are ready and able to return.
If we are to make further progress, we need additional investors or (unpopular view I’m sure) different owners.
Agreed but what is a more sustainable model whilst maintaining NL level at worst?
Based on current form, I would treat any play off place as a bonus. If we recover some of our pre-Christmas form, then great.
The bigger picture is that I don’t think the current ownership model is sustainable this level and certainly not in L2. Longer term interests may be better served by moving to a more sustainable model of ownership or operating, where we can afford to maintain running costs such as repairing the pitch, securing our training ground and re-establishing an academy. This isn’t intended to be negative or disrespectful to the current regime. It’s great they have taken us this far from our dalliance with extinction.
March 10, 2026 at 5:09 pm in reply to: Howe Can We Not Integrate A Proven Goalscorer In To Our Team? #317291Cough…
With Farrell doing well, I would send Carlton out on loan and recall Howe.
March 7, 2026 at 5:10 pm in reply to: Howe Can We Not Integrate A Proven Goalscorer In To Our Team? #317191With Farrell doing well, I would send Carlton out on loan and recall Howe.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Health warning. This is hearsay, but I have heard it from several sources.
(I also believe that one of the three remaining “reps” has only attended one home game this season, so I am not sure how they keep abreast of supporter views?)
If this is true them I am puzzled as to how this person was selected to represent fans. Unless, of course, he/she goes to all the away games and presents the views of travelling fans.
Okay, even if we accept that your point (which I don’t btw), what about contributing to the costs of Ross Barrows’ post surgery rehabilitation as well as leading the support for the Iron Bru initiated fundraising at what was a parlous time in the club’s history? Others will be able remind us of past contributions, but it hasn’t all been in return for shares-for which the club still receives a tidy cash injection.
I said much the same on X yesterday about the club’s failure to recognise the Trust. Bernard does fantastic work as leader of Irish Iron and deserves recognition, but so do the Trust. The bizarre thing about this as that many of II members will also be Trust members.
Neil was and still is a fan Deerey, and at the time you were the club basher not me I supported Swann.
On the club bashing itself its only their continued actions that get my goat, they’re the ones sucking up to different groups at the cost to others. And try selling us all types of snake oil at every opportunity. Selling us down the river with FC 100,000. They are not to be trusted imo.Take the latest on the Official web page, couple of pages on praise for the Irish irons £500 donation towards the pitch fund, did the trust get as much praise for their £13,000 share purchase.
Isn’t that a clear indication where the club is.3 users thanked author for this post.
I don’t think there was an opportunity to replace Neil after he resigned. The Swann regime was in turmoil. Regardless of personalities, are you really suggesting that a club appointed rep is a better approach than having a Board member nominated by fans’ groups?
The only previous attempt to have a fan rep on the Board was doomed because of the restrictions and the issues under that regime. That wasn’t the fault of the individual (nominated I think by all fans’ groups) and it certainly wasn’t a role that was given up by supporter groups. Sadly, the current regime is opposed to having fan representative on the Board. The VotF initiative is very limited in scope and may tick a few fan engagement boxes when the club is assessed on the fan voice aspect of the Football Governance Act.
The same elected fan group fought for and got a fan director on the board but was lapsed when the director resigned.
Not to say this current board would have allowed one anyway, but the position should never have been given up once you’ve got a foot in the door. He certainly would have advised the club to keep away from the fc100,000 debacle.
No doubt he resigned because of all the flack he was getting from fans wanting more out of him than what a director is allowed to disclose. And fans being fans just couldn’t and wouldn’t accept that.At least with the Vof there’s 3 of them so between them they know what’s being asked of the club without the backbiting as before, are able to publish what’s being asked and what the club response is.
Obviously they’re only be dealing with mostly minor issues and issues that the trust wouldn’t get involved in, but if they’re successful it’s mostly going to be better for everyone.An elected, properly constituted fans’ group affiliated to the FSA seems to be valued less by the club than self-appointed uber fans such as PD. Sadly, the club prefers this engagement to listening to supporter elected reps who work quietly, skilfully and diligently (and with little recognition) for the collective good.
I don’t blame the VoF “reps”. They seem well meaning, though the fact they are club appointed undermines their ability to speak truth to power and act independently. I mentioned this to one of the “reps”, though this isn’t documented anywhere. (I also believe that one of the three remaining “reps” has only attended one home game this season, so I am not sure how they keep abreast of supporter views?)
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
AuthorPosts