Forum Replies Created
-
Re: late substitutions.
“Generally30 seconds is added to stoppage time for each individual substitution made during a football match, according to BBC Sport and RefChat. If multiple substitutions occur during the same stoppage, it is counted as one opportunity, although the referee may add extra time if the process takes longer, notes TheFA.com.
Standard Rule: 30 seconds per substitution.
Contextual Time: If a player takes too long to leave the pitch, the referee can add more time.
Multiple Substitutions: Multiple substitutions by a team during the same stoppage count as one, but the referee will account for the total time lost.”
So basically, the more substitutions you make the more time you give the opposition to score.
Conversely it gives you more time to score too. But if you’re taking off your forwards and replacing them with defenders that would seem less likely”
1 user thanked author for this post.
What Andrew needs to concentrate on is coaching his players to pass to a teammate instead of blind flick-ons and hopeful punts upfield.
Really wasteful again last night.
7 users thanked author for this post.
Worse than their 9?
Stones gave him a lesson in both goal scoring and shithousery.
3 users thanked author for this post.
If we have to send players out on loan because we can’t give them game time then our squad is too big, not too small!
1 user thanked author for this post.
And who are the top five?
2 users thanked author for this post.
To play 100 games you have to be in that division for at least three years (assuming playoffs don’t count).
We could have been the top of the NLN Ton Table but we only stayed there two years.
The only thing that table shows is that the league is a bloody difficult one to get out of.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Can’t afford to play in the fourth division? Jeez!
Not quite sure about the Carlton/Roberts swap but the cognoscenti on here were saying Ewing should be dropped.
York stronger and half a yard sharper. Iron wasteful and wayward.
Had a decent spell of possession midway through the second half then Mahady decides to go play fullback. Shame as he’d made two good saves to prevent certain goals earlier.
And do we have a plan of attack other than to wait for the opposition to make an error?
All looking a bit disjointed!
1 user thanked author for this post.
I don’t for one minute believe that professional footballers stop trying once “the objective has been met”!
Their form dips, sure, particularly when they’ve been playing out of their skin for two dozen games. Ewing needs some time out to regain his early season form but AB seems loathe to drop him.
Perhaps if Brogan and Scales were still in the building he”d have better cover in midfield.
Dawson out now. I just don’t get the deal with loans both in and out.
2 users thanked author for this post.
We can only recall Howe if there’s a recall agreement in place.
Initial month I believe so that’s up next weekend.
With the players we have Butler should be able to change from a 4-3-3 to 4-4-2 as and when the need arises.
Not that difficult.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Yes, had fought point. Disappointed with Dale. Considering the are in the box seat they looked very average.
Once again too many aimless punts forward and misplaced passes.
Not quite sure what happened with their penalty? Did Dieseruvwe touch it?
A draw would have been a fair result. Bit of a howler from Mahady for their first and poor defending from the corner for the second. No complaints about their third as we were all up there in search of the equaliser.
Big problem tonight was the number of times we gave the ball away cheaply. Need to cut that out.
Always a big ask tonight and just the fourth defeat in 29 games, so not too shabby.
