Forum Replies Created
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
Bpg, all I’m reading from you on this is click bait, unsubstantiated propaganda,division and provocation. Makes a mockery of his assassination and doesn’t seem very Christian to me. You’re just confirming what Redmisttorps was pointing out.
This whole thread has read like the motivation is primarily to lump anyone who disagrees with bpg as one of the same, make out that anyone who disagrees with him are all extremists and preach hellfire and damnation once more.
USA is a country with problems in mental health treatment, polarisation and gun culture. It is not limited to one side, but that is all we have here. Smacks of an agenda, where the primary concern is to attack others for differences in opinion, just like the other right wing talking heads frothing for civil war and wanting Democrats considered a terrorist group. Even though prominent Democrats have all condemned the killing and there is no evidence that the perpetrator was a Dem. Many of the far-left hate Dems as well. What needs to happen is a cooling and deradicalisation of rhetoric and ideas, but it won’t happen because too many are vested in finger wagging at the other side and not thinking they have a part to play.
1 user thanked author for this post.
There is a likelihood that the killer will be a leftist (however, you regularly conflate leftists with liberals and anyone who isn’t a Christian rightist) aimed Christian beliefs. The recent Minneapolis shooting was committed by someone with Nazi sympathies, a right winger killed the Hortmans, so it’s not all on one side. Your comments smack of an agenda to attack others than to try and understand the problem. I am not denying far left problems, they do exist, but we cannot condemn without evidence. Which we don’t yet have.
Like I said, Kirk wasn’t without his far right enemies, and they have a history of violence.
I wonder who he means by serving those who killed him. I also wonder why atheists would be so bothered about who killed Jesus too, since they are apparently the only ones with bones to pick with him. Hmmm. The problems don’t just lie among those you dislike.
Why should we be punished on goal difference? Having said that, there’s no way of knowing that 2-1 would be the final score.
Having to replay the Eastleigh match is ridiculous when only seconds remained but fair play on the quick(ish) decision on the Wealdstone match.
Agreed, but it’s the rules. Same thing happened with that Buxton game 2 years ago.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Credit to the Wealdstone board. Hope Sam Cox was given a stern talking to by their directors for that.
2 users thanked author for this post.
If what Andy has said is true, it’s a forfeit and give them a 3 point deduction to prevent repeats.
1 user thanked author for this post.
If you want an example of how totalitarianism takes control look no further than Trump’s USA and project 25, it’s well under way.
Memes stop people getting into the country, Trump taking over DC and threatening other states’ rights with the National Guard, sucking up to Putin (whose alliance with tyranny was evident this week with the show of force with China and North Korea), raging at Stephen Colbert for comedy (whether you like the humour or not), stopping trans people from serving in the military and punishing companies or research bodies for wrongthink. Trump’s America is certainly looking more authoritarian. I hope JD Vance gives us another lecture on our values, while eroding freedoms back in his own country.
Also, a lot of the cringeworthy arse kissing around the cabinet and taking at least partial ownership of private companies like Intel sounds more like Marxism to me than anything evil socialists Obama and Biden did.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The current government have nothing to do with Linehan’s shameful arrest. The police are following legislation that predates the government by 2 decades and is something out of date. I agree that it is too much, and people like Linehan should not be arrested for opinions that make others uncomfortable, but it isn’t dictator Starmer shutting up free speech. Something needs to be done about it though. The online world has brought us challenges in dealing with issues like incitement, but more leeway is needed.
1 user thanked author for this post.
A sad day for the club. RIP Barrie.
1 user thanked author for this post.
There’s a lot of bubbling anger in Britain right now, but it’s important to remember that it will remain. She’ll carry on through it all.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I like that Butler sticks up for his players and protects them. Some seem to say they want their managers to be honest, but the manager has a responsibility for their morale. I know I would hate a boss who would slag me off to others, especially in public, and it would sap me in work. He isn’t a weak touch, he will expect professionalism, as has been said with his drills and organisation. However, he won’t chastise players and let’s them know he supports them. Rather that than Paul Hurst style sniping. I reckon man management is one of Butler’s strengths.
5 users thanked author for this post.
I would say he is more aware of social media comments than he let on at the fans’ forum.
1 user thanked author for this post.
