Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fan action needed? #205746
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    “Either way Peter Swann will have a very clear view of how we, the supporters really feel about what he is doing; and most importantly, in a way that he wouldn’t be able to argue with no matter how hard he might try to do so.”

    You’re assuming that he cares Bucks, I wish I shared your optimism.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: End of Season Prediction #205736
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Cox will regard two 2-0 defeats as a success if we stay up on GD, so expect an even more defensive approach for the last two games. Can he find 6 fit defenders for Saturday as 5 clearly isn’t enough.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Post Match Interview #205712
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    “We’ve had a good chat with the players yet again but there are some disappointed people in that dressing room.”

    Disappointed that the season isn’t over and their contract expired?
    You can tell us that Neil (again and again) but we know what we see!

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hursts Historic double #205703
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    “That is a total of 13 losses in two runs, scoring 8 goals and conseeding 40, and we still have him in charge of our team, I think that we are well overdue a reason why he is still employed??????”

    Because he does as he’s told.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Poll #205589
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    New business plan mate, sustainable future, what can go wrong?

    in reply to: Match thread #205586
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Just checked out SUFC Twitter again:-

    Scunthorpe United FC
    @SUFCOfficial·
    The lads are out preparing for this evening’s fixture.

    They’ve spelt failure wrong.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Match thread #205581
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Positive slant 3-4-3
    Less positive 3-5-2
    What we all think 5-4-1

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Match thread #205578
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Don’t they play rugby on Newport’s pitch? Could suit our lump the ball forward game and be bobbly enough to make our wayward passing look accurate. Sadly won’t help our wayward shooting, if we bother to shoot that is!

    in reply to: Match thread #205570
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    We’ll be asleep by 7.00 instead of 7.30?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Taxi for Cox ! #205522
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Which is why he won’t be here next season!
    However, although he’s a player I like, ( not as much as les ) his end product does not bear close examination.

    in reply to: Taxi for Cox ! #205487
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    There was talk a few months ago about possible players of the season,
    “Loft a shoe in” and “Gilliead easily L1 standard” for example.
    Anybody got any thoughts now?

    in reply to: Poll needed #205486
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    “After all, since 2013, what has actually improved at Glanford Park?”

    Possibly the easiest question ever posed on Bru?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: At what point do we consider the manager is the problem? #205464
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Possibly either:-
    1. They love playing for Scunthorpe so much that they couldn’t bear to leave even temporarily, or
    2. They think they’re too good for the NL, or maybe
    3. Nobody wanted them.

    in reply to: At what point do we consider the manager is the problem? #205438
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I think taking the new contracts off the table if they’re still unsigned is a reasonable, positive and wholely acceptable stance by the chairman. IMO many of the current onfield problems have been caused by the manager continuing to pick the players concerned and expecting them to be bothered.

    in reply to: Taxi for Cox ! #205434
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I think you underestimate the chairman IITB. Surely the smart move would be to keep Cox, sign cheap players in May/June/July/August and then sack Cox so that he can be blamed for the dross that we’re likely to sign and next seasons potential disaster.

    But Cass, what makes you think that Cox will have a say in who gets brought in during the Summer

    He won’t barton, but if he’s still here when they’re signed he can take the flak if/when they turn out to be useless. Most of last summers signings were made when we were without a manager so the chairman had to take the blame. I can’t see him letting that happen again.

    in reply to: Walsall Match Thread #205384
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Post match interview predictable with one or two new excuses.
    “I thought we got in some good areas in the first 10 minutes”
    And the other 80 Neil?
    ” they had half a chance that they turned into a goal with a midfield runner”
    Interesting idea, have we thought about trying it?
    “The second goal was really poor.” Again.
    ” but we lacked quality and belief” Again
    ” We are a bit leggy at the moment” Again.
    “Newport on Tuesday night to focus on now
    Same focus as the last few games?

    in reply to: Swann Own’s The Ground And Land #205331
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    ” I suppose it goes to show just how much contempt the club has for its fans right now!”

    That’s something else that hasn’t changed Daz. I’ve felt that the Club cared nothing for me and other supporters even before “Morongate.”

    6 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Cox quite post Mansfield #205211
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Quite right MKI, nothing else he could say. The problem is he says similar things every week and, sadly, I fully expect he’ll be saying it again come Saturday.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Mansfield Match Thread #205205
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    “Onaraise, McGahay and Taft have had to be thrown in there too quickly and have all played sh!te since Rory’s return.”

    Because they’re not fully fit or because they’re nervous about what’s behind them?

    in reply to: Mansfield Match Thread #205197
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I have to agree with Mick. Howard directs those in front of him a hell of a lot more effectively, which In my opinion settles the defence down more than when Watson is in goal.
    Watson is a good shot stopper but that’s where it ends with him. I think next season we need to move him on, re sign Howard and also sign another experienced GK to battle it out with him.
    I’m telling you now, we’ll need experience there next season…that’s a certainty.
    Watson can go for me. No great loss.

    I agree with your sentiments 100% WG but I think that hoping for 2 experienced players battling for any position, let alone keeper, is a forlorn hope. If we’re lucky we might get 18 or so with some experience (and hopefully some ability) with cover supplied by what youngsters we have left.

    in reply to: Taxi for Cox ! #205158
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Same as usual post match.
    ” We were poor again tonight.” Heard that before?
    “When we come in on Thursday morning, the focus will be on Saturday” Like the focus was yesterday and last Saturday? Or better?
    “we’ll have a good luck(?) around and see who really wants it.” Good luck with that!!
    ” A lot of them are hurting, and really disappointed with the way the season has gone because they expected more from themselves.” Doesn’t show Neil “We’ll pick them up ready for Saturday.” Yeh right!

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Taxi for Cox ! #205143
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    1) Which players should he pick? This is not a good squad, especially when you lose a couple to injury.
    Maybe ones that have some interest in SUFC next season?
    2) Not true. He moved away from a back 5 and it proved much more successful.
    Still reverts to it sometimes. Lone striker?
    3) Most managers do this.
    Some do it successfully
    4) Didn’t look the case against, say, Grimsby at home this season.
    Do you have many more examples, I bet I have more of the other kind.
    5) Maybe we’re just crap?
    No argument there.
    6) Yes, I do. I think he’s done very well with a terrible squad.
    He looks as if he’s kept us in the league, as for “very well” we’ll have to disagree.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Adkins #205120
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    He didn’t choose any of these players either. Just saying, it can be done.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Taxi for Cox ! #205118
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I’ve said before that the Club is in dire need of some stability. Some will argue that keeping us in L2 has been success for the manager but after almost a full season I ask this question – Has he shown any sign at all that he is learning how to be a Football League manager?
    He continues to pick the same failing players.
    He continues to use the same failing tactics.
    He continues to worry about the opposition rather than his own team.
    He continues to fail to motivate his players.
    He continues to insist we’re looking to win games which we clearly aren’t.
    He’s been dealt a bad hand that’s true, but does anybody believe he’s getting the best out of what’s available? I really want continuity but he has to prove he deserves to stay.
    Also disappointed with what Lillis appears to be contributing, many of us will remember his wonderful motivational run before the Swansea play off game. He appears to have lost that ability and seems ineffective, remember the Cox/Lillis appointment was hailed as the dream team at the the time.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: What A Sensible Approach Would Be For Next Season. #205091
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Come on les, you must have noticed that SUFC don’t do sensible any more.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Mansfield Match Thread #205087
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Another game where we were “looking for the 3 points” Difficult to achieve with no shots on target, not for the first time this season either!!
    What’s unbelievable is that there are 2 teams in the division worse than our shower (although they’ve both beaten us)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Taxi for Cox ! #205084
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I think you underestimate the chairman IITB. Surely the smart move would be to keep Cox, sign cheap players in May/June/July/August and then sack Cox so that he can be blamed for the dross that we’re likely to sign and next seasons potential disaster.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: The funniest thing ever in football? #205015
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Bad news mate, it’s Walsall next week not Madrid.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Staying Up ? #204997
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    That will just give them the opportunity they’ve been looking for to play their U21s in the lower leagues though.

    in reply to: The funniest thing ever in football? #204986
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    What about those unable or unwilling to travel (to Exeter & Carlisle for example) Surely better for the clubs to get a tenner occasionally than nothing at all.

    1 user thanked author for this post.