Forum Replies Created
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
Not unless anybody posts or refers to libellous comments and/ or publishes abusive posts. It would be helpful if they didn’t.
1 user thanked author for this post.
‘In all my years watching SUFC I have never known fans being told they are club killers by various anonymous accounts and threatened with a slap…’
However you look at it, it’s not good!
1 user thanked author for this post.
I know the answer to that: all of us!
4 users thanked author for this post.
I think it’s run it’s course now BS. Don’t worry about it.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Could be completely unconnected but I’ve seen this sort of thing recently following the links Iron Bystander posted. What the truth is, and the root of the accounts, is unknown. But any wonder there’s increased paranoia?
Who’s Iron Bystander, is it another fake account?, thought our linksmith was Interested Bystander?
Slip of the tongue. I meant Interested Bystander. No more a fake account than any of ours I suppose? Certainly not an account that’s threatened physical violence.
1 user thanked author for this post.
‘Ironforever99 has a bit to say about the abuse.’
Saw some of the earlier posts from Ironforever99 but not the last one. Are the burner accounts threatening physical violence happening again then? I mentioned this disturbing trend last week. I saw them, as I’m sure others did. Took some screenshots for what good it’s worth (probably nothing). There’s the toxicity, right there. Not people questioning or criticising the owner.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Saw this from Saleiron and echo those sentiments:
‘I have seen no one condoning abuse of the owner. Let’s not conflate that unacceptable behaviour with a healthy scepticism and a critical eye being applied to his decisions. Part of the reason we are where we are is a failure to do that sufficiently during Swann’s tenure.’
2 users thanked author for this post.
Totally agree Siderite. I would add, most the insults and abuse on here and social media seem to be coming from those not willing or prepared to question Hilton and raise concerns, towards those who are and are doing. I can understand some supporters being unhappy that Hilton has his critics, but watching sensible discussions frequently descend in to mud slinging and slanging matches is tiresome. If some supporters don’t like seeing the warranted questions and concerns, it’d be appreciated if they said why with some dignity and decorum or ignored it.
5 users thanked author for this post.
IB, mind me asking what has fuelled your obsession? Genuinely curious.
I was forwarded a link to the interview Hilton did after the Torquay game and was asked for my opinion and observations.
I am not obsessed with Hilton. However, the number of red flags hold my interest.
Fair enough. As I said, genuinely curious. Appreciate the reply. Red flags? Agreed.
1 user thanked author for this post.
‘He’s changed his name a few times and possibly operated in the grey area with his businesses in the past. That’s all that’s really come to light.’
Not being funny Cliff, but that doesn’t really inspire confidence and trust.
‘unfortunately for Hilton the form on the pitch has only fuelled Paranoia and speculation.’
Not just the form on the pitch though is it? The paranoia and speculation isn’t borne of that. Just my opinion. Hope your faith is justified. We shall see.
2 users thanked author for this post.
