Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Jordan Hallam #247548
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Tony Daws on 23rd October on OWS:-
    He then went on to provide a fitness update on the rest of the squad. He said: “We’re all okay. Jordan Hallam is obviously injured (hamstring) but working really hard to try and regain his fitness, and his ability to train on a regular basis without picking up an injury.”

    in reply to: Is Apter that good??? #247541
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Remember his age, he’s streets ahead of any of ours of similar age on whom we seem to be building our future. If half a dozen of our own were that good there would be cause for some optimism.

    in reply to: Getting into gp #247509
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    A member of the gentry should not misuse an apostrophe!!!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Sad times #247484
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    I think he’s got the formation at 89 minutes with the score at 0-1. Dewhurst in front of Nuttall looking for an equaliser.

    in reply to: The Heed #247482
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    2 for the opposition is a fair shout.

    in reply to: Waiting for the Swann statement #247386
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Too many CMs of the wrong type.

    By “wrong type” do you mean “not good enough”?

    in reply to: Waiting for the Swann statement #247380
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Blackpool in a straight swap for Apter?
    Sorry – just woke up.

    in reply to: Waiting for the Swann statement #247377
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Nuttall won’t go to anybody who saw him on Saturday!!
    (See category 2 in my post above.)

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Waiting for the Swann statement #247370
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    I don’t blame our caretaker boss, or even our players. They are piss poor, but they didn’t hire themselves.

    I think some players have to accept blame as well as current and recent managers. For me the players fall into two categories.
    1. Those that are simply not good enough, presumably they’re here because they’re cheap. We don’t have enough “good” players so some have to play, the managers job is to get them to be as good as they can be. Did Hill and does Daws?
    2. Those that have shown clearly that they have the ability but, for some reason, choose to perform to that level only occasionally during a game and sometimes not at all. Why is something the fans will never know but somebody needs to find out and sort it quickly.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: More TD gems. #247352
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    As are:-
    McSheffrey
    Adkins
    Alexander
    Laws
    Hill
    and loads of others. Unless we can get somebody on a rolling monthly contract (unlikely unless desperate) then we’re stuck with what we have until the club is sold.
    How likely is that? Ask Alcy!!

    in reply to: More TD gems. #247319
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    He does a good job for the academy and that’s where he should be.

    Can you justify that by listing the first team regulars he’s produced in the years he’s been in the job?

    in reply to: Southend #247277
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Yet another new low, another on Tuesday maybe. Astounding that a novice reporter can see things that our professional management team can’t. After listening to the whole game I still have no idea what system we were playing and neither, it seems, did the players. Embarrassing.

    in reply to: Southend #247220
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Any chance of a 4-4-2 do you think?

    in reply to: Swanns First Timers #247007
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    “the legion of potential buyers.”

    You need to read all the words, not just pick one out

    in reply to: Swanns First Timers #246984
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    We are getting a new super duper one soon not funded by Swann of course

    Hope we can take it with us to our phoenix club residence

    No doubt a working scoreboard will push up the price for the legion of potential buyers.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Expectations #246870
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    As a Scunny fan, if you expect to be disappointed you’ll seldom be let down.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: South Shields #246841
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Some gems from TD post match:-

    “I must say we didn’t turn up on the day,”
    “We were second best and for the first time since I’ve been taking the team, we didn’t really look like scoring,”
    “we just weren’t at the races.”
    “We were too slow in possession of the ball,”
    “we didn’t pass it quickly enough to try and shift the opposition,”
    “going a goal down so early didn’t help.”
    “It was disappointing coming from a set-play.”
    “A couple lads switched off and we got done.”

    Very good Tony, any fan watching the game would have said exactly the same thing.
    Tell us something we don’t know like WHY!!!!
    Because if you don’t know why then you won’t be able to fix it will you?
    It’s not the first time for many of those points is it?

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Home Truths #246788
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Interesting that, several months on, the youngsters that Hill used to “try” and keep us in the league are not exactly outstanding when playing several levels lower.
    Anybody NOT see that coming?

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: South Shields #246679
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Well after reading the latest updates it looks like the “best” team we can field would be:-

    Dewhurst
    Rowe Taft/Young Nlthe
    Ogle Beestin Whitehouse O’Malley
    Lavery Nuttall Daniel
    Bench – 5 youngsters

    in reply to: One nil to Scunny. #246591
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Should have said that IMO Gallimore is better than Pugh.

    in reply to: One nil to Scunny. #246584
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Isn’t that Whitehouse’s game? No point playing Pugh as a ball winner, if he wins it he’ll just give it straight back.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Wilcox-esque… #246532
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    No room for him or his like in this current system les. To get a DM in we’d have to lose one of the front 3.

    in reply to: Wilcox-esque… #246511
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    I don’t think you’re reading my posts so I won’t bother you any more.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: One nil to Scunny. #246505
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Unlikely, we’ve now got ourselves a team that needs to score 4 to win.

    in reply to: Wilcox-esque… #246503
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    A 4-3 home defeat a high?
    A 3-3 home draw against the third bottom team a high?
    One point instead of 6.
    We’ll have to agree to differ on what constitutes a high. You’re happy, I’m not. That’s football for you.

    in reply to: Wilcox-esque… #246500
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    I’m talking this season Cass, Solihull, Dorking and yesterday in particular.

    OK, not very high highs then. More averages wouldn’t you say? Bits of yesterday were highish but, taken as a whole match, not for me.

    in reply to: Wilcox-esque… #246493
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    I can pinpoint the lows but I’m struggling with the highs unless you’re going back a few years.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: 3-5-2? #246490
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Lack of squad depth (highlighted frequently on Bru) was a major factor yesterday. Where were the game changers, or even game savers, on the bench? We were only missing Feeney, Daniel and Ogle from a realistic starting 11 which would just about give us a match day squad with no allowance for injuries or suspensions. No transfer window restrictions so LET’S HAVE SOME ACTION!!!!

    in reply to: Work In Progress #246440
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    Anything to add you two?

    in reply to: Fa cup draw #246419
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 151

    From NL news mick:-

    ” Wrexham AFC’s FA Cup fourth qualifying round fixture at Blyth Spartans will now kick-off at 1pm due to TV coverage.
    The Red Dragons travel to Blyth for the match on Saturday October 15, and the fixture at Croft Park will now kick-off two hours earlier.”