Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hilarious that something like this was done when Swann is on the verge of selling the club.
Sums up how slow some of our fans are!Was he there to see it?
Was he there to negotiate with the prospective buyers?
Was he there to ‘fully support’ his team?
Qualify “on the verge”, how close are we? Be honest, you’ve no idea have you?12 users thanked author for this post.
Just off to buy a lottery ticket.
Will any of our youngsters be good enough for the NL next season? Not sure, none of them have particularly excited me so far but that’s understandable given the circumstances.
Are any of them ready for L2 now? Nowhere near. Don’t destroy them before they’ve made a start to their careers Keith.2 users thanked author for this post.
Mansfield have failed to score in 35% of away games this season.
Scoring 1.05 goals per away game.
They’ve only won 30% of their away games – losing 40%
They’ve conceded 23% of their goals in the last 10 minutes of games.A 1-0 win to us!
We are just the team they need to improve all of these stats.
It’s pointless when said owner could be at Aintree or sat on a beach somewhere.
Full focus should be on supporting the team, creating a good atmosphere that impresses the guys/girls in the directors box.But it’s OK for the owner not to give his “full focus” supporting his team or entertain prospective buyers? Doesn’t encourage fans support and I doubt it will impress the guests. One law for the rich and a different one for those of us who’ll still be here in the coming years. You really do have some strange ideas.
6 users thanked author for this post.
Potential new owners at the game tomorrow. All eyes on the directors box.
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOHHH, we’d better abandon any planned protest then in case it jeopardises any potential sale. Will the current owner be there to begin negotiations?
Cardiff?
Surely the rental amount due for a ground you don’t own would be of paramount importance to any prospective new owner.
What price do you put on a NL team without the ground?
We can’t go into liquidation when we have just won a Trophy.
So we’ve found the level at which we might be able to win a few games.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Im used to the Idea of NL football next season im over relegation we deserve it , Hill remains a massive let down but i am more concerned about the actual ownership / boardroom events currently on going and the actual survival of the club than SUFC could easily go out of business totally if things dont change and anew owner is found.
UTIHow can we go out of business totally when the ex-Chairman has told us that the club is sustainable? Ah, yes OK I see the problem.
4 users thanked author for this post.
There’s been progress in the Prediction League. A guaranteed 7 points every week, The Iron to lose and not score.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Presumably Mr Swann remains as a board member? That gives us Lee, Neil Wright, Mr Swann, Mrs Swann, Chris Swann & maybe Will Swann. So if it’s Swanns 4 vs non-Swanns 2 can there be any change?
2 users thanked author for this post.
“Whatever you may hear or see I haven’t taken one penny out of the club”
Doesn’t the ground count?
4 users thanked author for this post.
As you say, speculation only. Will we ever know?
Hill is supposed to be his own man. And Swanny is letting him ostracize Jarvis, if your right FI that’s another reason why we don’t want him here next season.
To me it indicates that Swann is letting Hill pick the team he wants. That hasn’t always seemed the case in the past.
I misread the posters name, I thought he was showing off as lesterthenightly!!
Lucky you lester.Not a whisky lover, G&T though if you’re having one.
Ffs what a brain dead post. That will just result in the club being put into admin.
How can some people be so stupid.Pot? Kettle?
When Lewis first came into the team he showed promise. Hill made a massive issue over protecting young players in the early stages of their career, rightly so, and took him out of the action after a few appearances. Why has he changed his philosophy in Cribb’s case?
1 user thanked author for this post.
1. BBC stats gives us 5 shots on target, I don’t remember their keeper making a save. ( I might have dropped off )
2.Feeney borrowed Pyke’s invisibility cloak and shared it with Beestin.
3. No quarrel with levels of effort.
4. Still give the ball away cheaply.1 user thanked author for this post.
NLI wrote:- “After listening to the podcast today Swann has proved himself what an utter loser he is. He said we are now sustainable and that’s what he wanted for our Club.”
What he failed to say was “sustainable” at what level. NLN looks a possibility I suppose.
Are you lot still wasting your time discussing this?
What do you want Swann to do? Talk to interested parties.. oh wait he already is!He says he is, does that necessarily make it true?
3 users thanked author for this post.
I don’t get involved in this social media stuff but isn’t the point of it to let your followers know what you’re doing? Left to the club we’d all be in the dark. (As usual!!)
2 users thanked author for this post.
But is it results or the level of complience that gets a manager the sack?
1 user thanked author for this post.
My fault, we posted at similar times and I was replying to les’s post on Sinclair, should have made that clear.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The OWS hasn’t told us that Manny’s gone yet, if Simon hadn’t posted his resignation we still wouldn’t know.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Based on Saturday yes, but, at the moment, he’s the same as many of the squad.They have ability but show it one game in 3,4 or 5 and can also ruin one of their good days with a ridiculous, avoidable error.
Improved massively this season but currently playing as though his confidence is shot to pieces. Understandable given the performance of the defence in front of him I suppose.
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
AuthorPosts