Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
My sole focus now is the period of inactivity.
You need a hobby !
I hope to god you get banned off this forum, you’re a complete moron. Is your life so boring that you have to constantly post about Hilton ?
Look, we all have doubts but wait for the deadline to come around, may 24th and just see if the deal is fully completed. If it isn’t completed and something seems off then you can put your armchair detective cape back on and resume your investigation into Hilton.
Until then I suggest you cut it out. I’m not sure what you’re trying to achieve here.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Patrick piss off to wherever you’ve come from. No doubt you’re either a club plant or a wind up merchant either way get lost. If you are indeed an Ilkeston and it’s that good of a club, go away and post about them.
I saw last week we’re offering contracts to Sellers flemming, Poulter, Nat Wallace and Robertson from the youths. Out of the current crop I’d keep Wilson, Shrimpton and maybe Ogle. Chapman and Elliot are already tied down for next season but the others can go for me.
Ogle I’m undecided on as gives his all but he’s a more than a bit rash at times and his delivery into the box is shite but he will run his 2 veg off and has the right sort of attitude so he may come in handy.
Look, just cut it out. Wait until the deadline is up and see if the takeover is completed, if not then speculate all you like but until then stop with all the speculation.
Really, it’s not wanted nor needed.
Look it’s the 3 club stooges, no doubt reverting back to type and taking swipes at fans.
Iron awe, Cliff and Awaywego, you’re an odd bunch, aren’t you ?
1 user thanked author for this post.
I remember Joe Lolley we had on loan who hardly got game time went back to championship and for 2 or 3 seasons was a top performer at that level.
Goode left us for a nominal amount and was sold for 1mill. Wootton has scored 14/15 goals this season at lg 2 for Stockport and a load before that for Notts County. Godden has done well at championship level.
I wouldn’t be surprised if the same happened with Poulter. No doubt we’ve had talent but just not nurtured them correctly. They show talent but there tends be a breakdown in between the talent and them transferring it to the pitch.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Can’t you seriously give it a rest with this bullshit ?. I’m wary and remain sceptical until the deal is fully completed and it’s in Hilton’s hands but all this armchair detective investigation work is taking it too far.
Taking him on face value if he has every intention of fully completing the takeover, is all this rubbish by Interested Bystander going to want him to even complete it ?
I suggest you wait until may24th to see if the deal goes through and then if it doesn’t for whatever reason you can speculate all you like but don’t be doing it now !
1 user thanked author for this post.
However they did not have a player embargo or the threat of closure to contend with
Player embargo was dissolved within a week of him in being in charge. There’s no excuse, 5 points from safety is not already down.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Chapman, Beestin and Bunker were missed but I argue that Dean’s fascination with playing a formation which seemingly doesn’t suit the players and continual poor substitutions were more damaging.
Nelson was getting a tune out of the players and we were 5 points from safety, how is that already relegated ?. I laugh whenever I see supposed fans use that as an excuse for why Dean has failed miserably.
Where Hilton is concerned I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt because as it stands we wouldn’t have a club without him so I’m more than grateful. I will be waiting to see if the sale of the club fully goes through by 24th May because if it doesn’t the jury will well and truly be out.
If Hilton get’s all of it purchased by then It will settle all of us down and we can truly start to move forward as a club but before that happens I’ll remain sceptical. The club fully changing over to Hilton is the sticking point because if that doesn’t happen for whatever happens, Mr Hilton will be met with a tidal wave of scepticism and rightly so.
O god Good Ole Patrick is back again, no doubt they’re either a club stooge plant or a wind up merchant.
How is expecting a new manager to come in to choose a formation to suit his players and to play some cohesive football toxic ?
All people have done is point out that since Dean has come in we’re currently 2nd from bottom in the league form table, playing awful football in an awful formation.
Is stating facts toxic now ?
What fans supposed to do, all lie to each other and be in utter denial ?.
Is that what counts as non toxic in your eyes, Patrick ?
1 user thanked author for this post.
believe there is just a lack of patience with some clamouring for Deans head, we have won games under him, the Wealdstone win was a really good all round performance but there has been a real lack of consistency overall
When this season is all but done he would have had 17 games which is plenty of time to come up with a formation that suits the players at your disposal and to play some cohesive football.
Nelson took 3/4 games to achieve that. 17 games isn’t that far off half a season. We had one performance against Wealdstone but apart from that it’s been awful. I posted the form table since Dean is in charge and taking into account another loss against Oldham, we’re currently second from bottom.
“we have been clinging to the wreckage of a broken club for five seasons and David Hilton or Jimmy Dean are not miracle workers”
Expecting a manager to come in to assess his players to mould them into a formation that suits them and get them playing half decent football is not expecting miracles.
I keep saying this but it took Nelson 3/4 games to assess the players he had and he came up with a formation and a system which suited them and we played some good football. There is no excuse and iron-awe needs to stop with this apologist’s bullshit, it doesn’t wash.
Nobody has said he’s had it easy but he knew what he was walking into and so did we, what we did expect though was a manager with some know how and ability to form them into a cohesive unit at the very least and he hasn’t even managed that. On the whole the choice of going with Dean has backfired.
Harsh reality is you can be an apologist all you like and fight Dean and Hilton’s corner but we’ve gotten worse even since Dean came in to replace Nelson. Nelson had much less to work with than Dean so cut the crap.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Just because I said he was learning on the job
Problem is nobody has seen any evidence of that, as cassidy stated above, it’s the same mistakes and mindset game in game out. The decision to keep playing a formation that doesn’t suit the players is diobolical.
There is no way on planet earth it should take a manager 14 games to realise this and the punchline is that he still hasn’t. If Nelson can devise a system which suits the players in 3/4 games it shouldn’t take 14 games to pass without him realising that what he’s doing is not working.
Dean should have worked that out 6 or 7 games ago and the fact that he still hasn’t tells me he’s not learnt anything. How can a manager be learning on the job when they’re continually doing the same things that haven’t been working ?
I’ve seen the stats and didn’t exactly pull up any trees in NLN. I think he bottomed out there ability wise at that level and was truly found out at this one.
A manager should have more than one of playing, surely ?
I hope I’m wrong but I suspect I’m not. Dean will be signing all next seasons players with a view to playing the formation everybody hates, the dreaded 4/2/3/1 “the only one he knows”
I suspect we’ll have the same problem this coming season with turgid direct shitty football consisting of an isolated target man.
Even Dean might surprise us and come good in a years time
The way he’s been show up tactically, I wouldn’t hold your breath if I was you.
1 user thanked author for this post.
More worrying is the fact he came here carrying an injury. I’d like to know if he had or a medical or not and if he didn’t have a thorough medical, I want to know why not ?
This is sheer lunacy.
I saw it. It was swiftly deleted.
I don’t know what’s worse. The fact we are supposedly paying him £1.5k a week or the fact he was injured when he arrived. Amateur hour.I couldn’t believe my eyes when I read this
“Rancey’s struggling, he had an injury when he came in and we both thought it had cleared up but it hadn’t and it has affected his performances. Subsequently, that affects our performances and it’s unfortunate that it hasn’t gone.
“He’s going to see a specialist tomorrow and he might be involved here and there for a few minutes but I think it’s unlikely now, to be honest”
Isn’t that what medicals are for ?
I’d hate him to be shaping next years squad because I don’t think he’ll be around after 15/20 games (because he’s not good enough) then we’ve wasted a key transfer window and we are on the back foot again!!
I’ve said the same. This is my biggest worry.
Fair enough these might not all be his own players but he wanted Elliot, Bennett, Rance and Sembie Ferris in because he’s admitted to it. Ok so give him free reign to sign another 10+ players but the big question mark I have is that he’s not utilized what he’s had since he’s came in very well at all.
This fascination on that 4/2/3/1 formation has been a big reason why we’ve gone down. The formation looks like it doesn’t suit the players, everybody else sees it just doesn’t work and yet he persists with it.
Any manager worth his salt looks at what he’s got and plays a system which best suits the players he has at his disposal. Nelson took 3/4 games to devise a system but least it worked and we had a clear identity. I find it mind blowing that he’s kept going down the same route even though it’s not really worked since he’s been here.
Will a whole squad of his players suddenly solve his shortcomings as a manager?
I don’t think so, it’s the complete lack of tactical awareness which bothers me. You can also throw questionable man management skills into the post as well because if he had good man management skills he’d have spotted that this formation he keeps playing doesn’t work.
The difference is he’ll have leeway with Hilton but not much due to how he’s done this season, whereas if he came here with a clean slate and got all his own players in we could potentially have been in even more trouble as he would have been here for longer.
Point I also come back to is that he’s tactically absolutely clueless and he’s failed to get the best out of what he’s got now. The reason Elliot has been so bad is because he either plays him as a lone frontman or out wide and everybody knows he suits neither role but he’s hellbent on playing that awful formation he’d rather put square pegs in round holes.
It honestly does baffle me that he still keeps persisting with it. I just don’t get it at all. Even today he was a bit more braver and stuck two strikers on but even then we ended up with Bennett and Carver up there.
Appears to me that Dean knows one formation 4/2/3/1 and starts with it no matter what. Dean just doesn’t appear to have the required tactical nous to even play 2 up front, he has one way of playing and that’s really your lot.
Next season we need to put some serious building blocks in place in terms of stability and the thought of Dean having free reign to sign who he wants to fit that awful formation scares the hell out of me and I’m not entirely sure there’s a way back from that if he carries on flattering to deceive.
Hilton will stay with him but if it was me personally I’d give him the next 3 matches and call it a day. 17 games is enough with new players to improve but if anything we’ve gotten worse.
Other teams have done it this season and are turning their season around so there’s no excuse.
In know but having a clueless manager is hardly helping. If that’s true about Rance then Hilton needs to get a grip because that’s absolutely ridiculous.
You’re clearly a wind up merchant, Awaywego. The fact is he isn’t good enough and the stats prove it. Dean wasn’t that great in NLN either.
Only problem is Awaywego, we let Dean draft all his own players in specifically to play this 4/2/3/1 formation and he tanks in the first quarter of next season we’ll be in deep shit.
Awaywego, you’re boring now. Dean isn’t very good due to being tactically inept. Plods forward with this one formation which doesn’t suit the current players, everybody else can see it hasn’t worked and yet he still keeps playing it.
You can tell the players don’t want to play for him.
Deans current managerial form
Last 28 matches in NLN won 10, Drawn 6 and lost 12, gaining 36 points with a points per match ratio of 1.29. So all in all “including this shit show while he’s been here.”
Dean has overseen 41 matches won 13, drawn 8 and lost 20 gathering 47 points. 47 points out of a potential 123 points.
The stats are there to prove it, he just isn’t very good. I suspect he found his managerial level at NLN. Even at NLN level he hardly pulled up any trees.
When Nelson was here we were 5 points from safety and now we’re 11 points from safety. We have declined ever since he took over from Nelson.
The stats don’t lie awaywego.
Today for instance when he toom Shrimpton off, rather than having a half a braincell and bringing shields on to put him left, Wilson on the right and moving Elliot next to Bennett, he leaves Elliot out wide and sticks an equally worse target man on so we end up with 2 shite lumps up front.
Please make that make sense. This is what you get with Dean and the fact he’s not learning is that he’s just not tactically minded.
GO GO GO GO GO GO GO !!!!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Only thing I can see him doing is signing very specific players to play that one formation he’s hell bent on playing. The one that hasn’t suited the players this time around which has failed to work in the 14 games so far.
Dean just isn’t good enough and has been found out. Awaywego keeps claiming he’ll do better with his own players but he can’t correctly manage the one’s he’s got now.
Tactically he’s the worst we’ve had in charge. Dean keeps playing a formation which doesn’t suit the players he’s got, while everybody in the stands knows it doesn’t work.
What makes you think because he get’s his own players that will ever change ?. Those are his shortcomings.
Last 28 matches in NLN won 10, Drawn 6 and lost 12, gaining 36 points with a points per match ratio of 1.29. So all in all “including this shit show while he’s been here.”
Dean has overseen 41 matches won 13, drawn 8 and lost 20 gathering 47 points. 47 points out of a potential 123 points.
Wow.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Further evidence as he didn’t do that great in NLN towards the back end of his time there. Peterborough sports have actually achieved better results since he came here.
https://twitter.com/MickDAllen/status/1644655425596293121/photo/1
2 users thanked author for this post.
O’Malley has been in good form for Alfreton. I wouldn’t be against recalling him and giving him another contract and replace Daniel. We would have to play him either as a winger or a wing back though as he’s a bit dodgy defensively as we all know.
I’ve not seen nothing in Dean to make me believe he’s good enough WG but I believe he gets a fair crack of the whip that’s only fair. 13 games with the rabble he’s had is not fair.
Come the end of the season we’re talking 17 games which is not a lot off half a season. Most of these players are new players, not saying they’re the one’s he 100% wanted but they’re here.
Bennett is the calibre of striker he wanted here and he’s gash. Sembie Ferris has hardly had a kick. Elliot only track record of scoring and won’t alter tactics to get the best out of him.
I just think there’s enough evidence to suggest he hasn’t got everything he can out the players he’s got now. Would it be any different with a complete new fresh batch of players ?
Only danger is if he carries on to struggle after drafting in a full squad of his own players, to then have somebody else come in and work with what he’s signed.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Ogle is an odd one for me, as he’s usually solid and committed and always gives 100%. Only problem is he’s final delivery into the box is complete tosh for the most part and he’s too rash at times.
I wouldn’t be averse to letting him go.
Wilson I’d keep
Chapman is here for next season regardless
Elliot’s here for next season
Shrimpton has something to offerApart from that they all can piss off. Pugh gives his all but can’t shoot and that yesterday was plain stupid. Beestin has ability but he’s been on the decline for the last couple of season. Started well but has tailed off since.
Butterfield can go for me, he’d be a top player at that level but I doubt he’d want to stay and he’s not been playing that well himself either so he could be a bit of a luxury play in NLN and we can ill afford any of those.
Needs to make a good start next season if not then he will go Hilton more or less said that as well,
Only problem is by then we’ll be back to square one as Dean will have already signed a whole host of HIS OWN players. I don’t think Dean will go but I’d like him to as do many others.
What have you seen in Dean to make you believe he’s good enough ?
3 users thanked author for this post.
1 upfront as usual for the next 4 games so wouldn’t surprise me if we don’t score a goal again until next season. Dean is clearly incapable of fielding a positive line up/formation and is reluctant to budge in an attempt to get the best out of Elliot.
Honest to god, it wouldn’t surprise me if we didn’t score another goal this season. That’s how bad it is. Ever since Dean has come in we’ve gradually gotten worse.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
AuthorPosts