Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303562
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Montel may not have said that he was committed to staying. That was a claim put forward by others. It’s funny how these shenanigans always follow Dave and it’s always others being duplicitous.

    in reply to: One for you Rene #303555
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    The table is a liar until the last game. I remember a decade ago when Portsmouth won League Two and hadn’t ever touched top spot, even for results as they stand during games, until the last 15 minutes of the final game.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303552
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It’s this kind of guilt tripping and lies that already scream red flag and why I worry for Matlock.

    No doubt it will be because Gibson is a rotter out to get Dave, like it was for Bru, Bury AFC, Matt Slater, George Taft, the FA, every business that filed a CCJ and every Tom, Dick and Harry.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303514
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It’s never good to blow one’s own trumpet. It makes you appear like you’re trying to convince yourself and doesn’t really convince others.

    Come on pot and kettlle

    This might mean something if I thought I was some great shakes and not a flawed person like everyone else on this forum.

    in reply to: Hereford #303484
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Sod’s law we get Buxton in the semis.

    in reply to: Hard luck lads. #303480
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I don’t think it will, mate, to be fair. I honestly don’t think your lot will recover from this. But thanks all the same.

    Hard luck lad; good luck in the playoffs. Blown it.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303472
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It’s never good to blow one’s own trumpet. It makes you appear like you’re trying to convince yourself and doesn’t really convince others.

    in reply to: Hereford #303470
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Reckon we’ve settled for third place!

    Might be second, ahead of the champions elect.

    in reply to: Brackley Town #303468
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    This is why I never subscribed to the idea that Kiddy were shoo ins for the title, even with our stuttering away form. Brackley had the easiest run in and Kiddy could easily stumble.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303425
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I don’t think Matlock fans were swayed by your opinions tbh. They were more likely motivated by their own worries over where the club may be without promised investment over what you have to say. I don’t think you or us are important enough to have much influence over Matlock fans.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303402
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    You will have a lot of sympathy from Scunny fans and Bury fans, Mtfc fan. I suspect those who voted yes might not get so much if things do go awry, but I understand the scaremongering tactics used on the fans. It was done here.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Oh dear! #303384
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I wonder who he’ll foster as the scapegoat with Matlock like with Bury AFC or Bru. There’s the cricket club, I guess, but the divide and conquer strategy will need some on the fanbase to be the enemy tormenting poor Dave.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303319
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Fans get passionate about their teams and many feel anger towards those who they feel ruined their club. Hilton was happy to seize on ill feeling towards Swann. In time it will die down, but people will still have a say where it is relevant due to historical connection.

    Grimsby fans still discuss Fenty when he crops up in talking points. We are not unique. Mark Weaver was told to avoid going to Donny ever again after he left, ‘mad Ken’ Richardson of Donny died a couple of years ago and some Donny fans cheered it on their forum. I saw rumours of SISU buying out Reading and Coventry fans were not being kind on social media. Same for other clubs with their disliked owners. I get it may be hard to hear for those with sympathy to the owner, but surely some understanding of how hurt fans were is in order and that when topical news items appear, like with Matlock, there will be some discussion and not necessarily positive.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303312
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Not really, but given the history of Hilton with Scunny it is bound to generate discussion and maybe you should accept that many won’t be positive given how it ended. Whether you agree with it or not, many won’t like him and himself and you will just have to live with that. You can’t force everyone to like you. I don’t care if you like me, you shouldn’t care that I and others think Hilton is a slimeball. It’s not just limited to here either. I have heard not so positive comments at Scunny games from fans, as well as on twitter and Facebook. He left with us in peril and many will blame him for that.

    The antagonistic kind of talk you have engaged in is the sort which created issues among some Scunny fans then and now. That was one of the things that caused souring and many suspect it was deliberate for his own ends. If you think that’s wrong, fine, it may well be, but everything done by himself and you on here helped cause the divide. Intentional or not.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303308
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I don’t particularly care who you feel sorry for. I am quite content in the knowledge that I didn’t clap along the con man’s antics, didn’t excuse and I don’t live a live sad enough to go onto another club’s forum to insult others for daring not to see positive in a mate who contributed to the club’s downfall (I am not letting Swann off the hook).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303305
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    You’re supposed to be a burger flipper for Ilkeston, yet you’re continuing to care about what Scunny fans say about your con man pal on our own forum. Crazy or what?

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303299
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Little chance of that though if Hilton gets the club you saddos will be wanting it to fail won’t you.

    No. We’ll be wanting him to fuck off, and the Club to survive and prosper.

    If we wanted Matlock to fail, we’d be cheering him on with his exploits.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303298
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Just like with us, happy clapping Hilton like a seal will do sod all for Matlock. Having concerns is not anti-democratic or wanting to fail.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303274
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I didn’t realise that we had to agree or refuse to listen to our concerns if one group vote for something. If Matlock vote him in I won’t be clapping along like a seal, but I’d be worried for them.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303134
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    There goes the dummy.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303117
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Ah, the usual blackmail and guilt tripping from nice guy Dave.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #303115
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    He may have scammed, bullshitted and sowed divisions among the fanbase for his own ends, but at least he’s a nice guy according to his mates.

    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #302887
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    How many con men do you need to apologise for to be a genuine fan?

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #302882
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It’s heartwarming that you think about us every minute of everyday Pat.

    I feel a bit bad now, it’s only because we’re envious, any chance we could all be mates again? I would let you tell me about your world class plastic pitch, or whatever else you want to talk about.

    As long as it’s world class and about Ilkeston.

    Yeah, his mate’s a spiv, but how many games do you go to?

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #302879
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Out he goes with the words to soothe his own ego. The pugeon struts across the chess board.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #302875
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    The fans who post elsewhere, barring someone who was a former Scunny White and has been imprisoned for pushing drugs to youths, think Hilton was an arsehole too.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #302869
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I have been to several games in the northern premier league. All outside of Scunny and none treated Ilkeston as some club to be envied. They were just seen as another club at that level.

    No talk of their world class facilities or how they wished their scran was as good as that by the burger tosser at Ilkeston.

    in reply to: Hiltons matlock #302861
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Whatever has happened since day one with David Hilton, you would not even have a club without him… FACT!… all the crap about someone would have jumped in last minute…. didn’t happen did it?
    As for the crap football you are playing?… when you were top and looking like going up… no mention of David Hilton!… now you have bottled it… you and the happy clappers say it is because you are playing with Hiltons signings?…. you can not have it both ways can you?… no mention of Swann anymore I notice?….I honestly believe if the roof blew off Glanford park it would be Hiltons fault on Iron Bru

    He’s a convicted shill.

    Why are you on here defending him after all this time? Get on with your life ffs.

    Because he knows the crook and is a rather strange bloke who can’t take it that most have seen through the con man. A huge ego, on display here, doesn’t help either.