Forum Replies Created
-
The Bible is a reliable collection of historical documents that were written by eyewitnesses during the lifetime of eyewitnesses,who reported on supernatural events that took place to fulfil specific prophecies,and they claim they were divine in nature and not of human origin.
No it isn’t.
Your New English Bible is a modern rewording of the King James Bible. That was completed in 1611 and was the work of just 8 ministers belonging to the C of E.
There were (and still are) no original texts to translate. The oldest manuscripts were written down centuries after the supposed death of Jesus Christ. There are over 8,000 in existence and no two are alike.
None of these were used by the King James translators who just reworded the RC Latin text altering passages so they would be approved by King and Parliament. The changes made run to hundreds of thousands.
So here in the 21st century you believe that the “Word of God” is a book edited in the 17th century from 16th century translations of 8,000 contradictory copies of 4th century scrolls that claim to be copies of lost letters written in the 1st century?
You may call it faith. I call it stupidity
1 user thanked author for this post.
But away supporters are not getting more information are they? Hence the OP.
Just rumours being bandied about like we’ve been experiencing all year.
1 user thanked author for this post.
“To echo your thoughts? What exactly are your thoughts? “
My thoughts are in UNISON with the video. To write on here the same message would be impossible.Hope you not sitting any written exams in the near future!
2 users thanked author for this post.
Just wanted to know if this was actually a thing or complete bollox!
1 user thanked author for this post.
“The illusion of an independent mind”?
Run that one past me again!
1 user thanked author for this post.
On judgement day ,your mockery will receive just punishment.
Aye! He loves us so much that he’s going to punish us for all of eternity if we don’t love him back!
That’s not the behaviour of an omnipotent deity, it’s the behaviour of a psychopath!
All made up nonsense anyway. Nothing to see here, move on.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The first thing that should be looked at is that fabled “strip of land”!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Couple of Mackem mates who were at the Boro game last Saturday.
Said Hackney and Matt Crooks bossed the midfield (Crooks also on the scoresheet).
Remember that Bradford game? 3-2 with Toney (2) & Crooks getting the goals. Happy days!
2 users thanked author for this post.
From the IT Brackley newsletter:
“The Glanford Park Stadium has an ACV (Asset of Community Value) on it and we at the Iron Trust are prepared to activate the ACV which would give the Iron Trust until the end of February 2024 to either work with any prospective buyer or put together a bid ourselves. A decision on this will be finalised next week. We have been working with the FSA Football Supporters Association on the options open to the Iron Trust.”
6 users thanked author for this post.
There’s a thread of light relief and it never goes out!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Wasn’t the wearing of scarves around the wrist a Bay City Rollers thing?
When I arrived in Newcastle in 1971 I had of course a red/white scarf and a red beanie hat. As a naive Scunthonian I couldn’t understand why the less than friendly Geordies kept spitting on me and calling me a filthy Mackem!
Fifty years on I still hold a grudge!
1 user thanked author for this post.
In fact ban all supporters!!!
Or didn’t Hilton try something like that?
1 user thanked author for this post.
