Forum Replies Created
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
Hill put it in as a wind-up answer to a not very bright question.
He then reduced it to 6 with the same laugh in his voice.2 users thanked author for this post.
As ever, we have a young forward making his way. It’s the toughest job in football – and there have been plenty on here getting on his back.
The intolerance is not racist but neither is it fair.
I see a player working hard for the team and his role coming together bit by bit.
It won’t happen overnight.
The lad snapped – and shouldn’t have done – but why do some get onto the back of every young forward? – It has cost us much in past years and so many don’t get it but do complain when one of these guys starts scoring for someone else!
Every chance he will now want to leave.
We need to have someone better lined up before we even consider driving this guy from our club.
Shame!2 users thanked author for this post.
I am not too familiar with such documents. Anyone able to help with the subtext?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Provided all the promises made by a certain party are kept – and why wouldn’t they be? – everything will be hunky dory.
2 users thanked author for this post.
The answer to that Fe, is probably that alongside Delaney, Jai is not really a CB.
As an occasional patch up due to injuries – maybe.
IMHO, let the lad be the decent FB that he is. What’s more he will surely improve.2 users thanked author for this post.
Points and wins are of no relevance, BS – they haven’t been for ages.
All that matters is putting in ‘good minutes’ for inexperienced players.(I do agree with CT about Wilson, though. But to be fair he tried his guts out.)
I don’t think that there is any hidden plan to put out loadsa youth in the team for the NL next season. That would be committing harakiri.
Do O’Malley and Rowe (as FBs, of course) even count any more?
1/2 youngsters who have learned what it’s about in recent months and 7 or 8 experienced players is a good team balance – especially with 3/4 youngsters on the bench who are not without valid experience.
Under current financial conditions – youth must play some part – and of course, it must not fill the first team.
This is why I wrote elsewhere that we probably need: 8 in with experience. To do this properly means not bringing in expensive 18 year old loanees who don’t care all that much.7 users thanked author for this post.
After a crazy opening five minutes, we began to gradually get a foothold and even pulled a goal back.
From then on, we played really well and matched Bradford for the rest of the game.
Spine the issue again.
A decent CB alongside Delaney, a midfield general and a proper forward – there’d have been a strong chance of an Iron win – even with all the youngsters.
Beestin looked best I’ve seen him in ages. Moore-Bilham and Gallimore were excellent. All other young uns put in a shift.
Rory was terrific.I’d rather see that salary be spent on a player.
4 users thanked author for this post.
Just what we need – a possible points deduction to start off in our new division.
3 users thanked author for this post.
I’m on warfarin. (Negotiated two units a day with the consultant.)
One pint, typically equates to 300+ calories.
Two small Irish = 120.
No brainer for me. I do miss good beers but for me now – a very rare treat.1 user thanked author for this post.
A very decent performance from Rory today.
Matheson did the business and Feeney had some awesome moments.
All the youngsters are getting better, game on game. So many of them developing.
Let’s hear for Bunn and Hallam – great goal and decent assist.2 users thanked author for this post.
Sorry, Fe. I do understand. But I’m far too bone idle to take on a task of that magnitude!
1 user thanked author for this post.
