Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RETAINED LIST #237513
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Since poverty kicked in, Renee’s assessment is spot on.
    The chances of a Cork, Yates, Lansbury or Toney are all distant historical memories.

    No untried and untested youngsters from the ‘probably can’t/won’t make it’ pile!

    in reply to: Alex Perry #237512
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Eased out, shall we say?

    in reply to: Up the Swanee #237455
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    This an odd one and I make no comment.
    Two relatives and two friends who had stopped supporting are going to be attending some matches next season – but naturally, will not be risking the purchase of a season ticket.

    in reply to: Up the Swanee #237398
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    The analogy has been used before – but if you get poor service and a lousy product – how long do you keep paying out good money for it?
    Even doing that for several weeks smacks of incipient insanity – and yet fans are expected to do this year on year, decade on decade.
    Then the shriek, “If you don’t pay to watch this load of poo – you are not a real fan!” (Otherwise known as ‘the blackmail factor.”)

    5 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: BUNN turns down new deal. #237332
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Worth having around for total peanuts but not in any other circumstances?

    (Do pay-as-you-play deals still exist?)

    in reply to: BUNN turns down new deal. #237324
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    If we can’t do better – then we is in big trouble.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Padraig Amond #237299
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Used to score for fun but Newport loaned him to Exeter.
    3 goals in 26 games and is 34.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Tyrece Sinclair #237214
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Signing him would probably be a good call.
    What we now need is signings which are definitely good calls.

    in reply to: Goodbye Keith #237213
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    1) His ‘signings’ were very late January leftovers because a certain party did not lift the embargo.
    2) What can anyone possibly say in post match comments? I’ve been a speaker in a number of contexts and saying anything which doesn’t sound like BS is nigh on impossible in his situation.
    3) He couldn’t have succeeded – nobody could.
    4) Cox created the mess to an extent. I could hardly say that it was all his fault – though.

    Let KH do the rebuild and then we’ll see. The problem is that we are both totally guessing. You are guessing that he’s crap and I’m guessing that he isn’t. Time alone can tell, IFA.

    6 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Goodbye Keith #237170
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Dog’s mess. – Who can argue that?

    in reply to: RETAINED LIST #237153
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Ah, SD101 – you are expecting a lot of Blue Riband bars being purchased coz we’ll be winning so many games?

    in reply to: Goodbye Keith #237151
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    My opinion is based on the fact that an established manager has been tasked with herding cats.

    IMHO, as soon as he saw we were doomed, he began to plan for next season. Squeezing every possible minute of time on the pitch out of as many young lads as possible was exactly the right start to planning for next season.

    As usual, I’ll say ‘give him til October’. It’s the only fair thing to do and any new manager coming in, who probably would not be an improvement in any case, will not have the faintest inkling of what horrors await in attempting the rebuilding of The Iron.
    Judging KH on results is like cutting someone’s legs off and then kicking them in the head because they don’t tap dance.

    We have sacked too many decent enough managers and every attempt to use the untried and untested has not worked too well.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: RETAINED LIST #237145
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    The question will surely be whether we need 3 CBs + Young – or can make do on two CBs + Young?
    If Taft is in the picture then I reckon we’ll need the larger number.

    What we have lacked, for what seems an eternity, has been two useful forwards to: hold up play; be able to play back-to-goal if required; notch the simpler chances. But where can we find two 1 in 4 strikers when we are paying in monkey nuts and with a Blue Riband bar as a win bonus?

    I don’t want Feeney in CM – it’s not what he does best.

    You would not expect Nuttall to start.

    So: we need CBs, real forwards, pace down one flank and from CM. We need a Grant-style general who ain’t kaput and at least one genuine utility player.

    We cannot afford to have ANY young loanees, IMHO. It does not work for us.

    So many developing young players – we can almost fill the bench But, of course we shall need a GK too.

    A fortnight ago, I wrote that we needed 6 – 8 established players and wiggle room for injuries and not fitting in – which always happens.

    I am reviewing that and now feel that nine is the very minimum.

    in reply to: To Northampton fans…. #237138
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Most L2 teams were signing the new players they wanted from the 3rd of January.
    The Iron were grabbing at leftovers almost four weeks later.

    For the life of me, I can’t see why we were not able to bring in better players than our L2 rivals did – especially since the embargo loan had been paid off just as promised.

    in reply to: Contracts – baffling #237102
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Added to any injury issues – Hill has clearly wanted to discourage players he doesn’t want from staying.
    Probably thinks that anyone with any sense of pride would not want to stay if never in the squad.

    After three or four games – Millen was starting to look decent – then injured again. Sigh!

    in reply to: Goodbye Keith #237029
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Look at all the stats of previous Iron managers. Those with 20+ games in charge – how many have had a win % of 50+?

    in reply to: Loft Promotion Clause #237021
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Some players can play well in a decent/reasonable side but are incapable of lifting a poor one.
    If Taft is contracted and IF the team improves – he may improve too.
    I shan’t hold my breath, though.

    in reply to: Gutless and clueless #236994
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    In any job you have to work within the parameters given.
    Are football managers exempt from this universal truth?

    in reply to: Goodbye Keith #236992
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Oh great. We are to start looking for someone better than the highly respected Keith Hill; somebody with a better record and starting the whole absurd management replacement thing once more. Terrific.

    Didn’t the former Chairman said he’d pay up the debt IF needed to allow proper signings in January.
    If that’s what happened – then clearly ALL blame is on Hill.
    If it did not then …

    Too many people have got upset about awful results when the season was already dead. Playing young uns was exactly the right course to take. Planning for next season

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: To Northampton fans…. #236991
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Look at the array of LATE January signings in that list.

    On a different tack – I can’t really see why Matheson was so ordinary when he arrived and yet has recently soared up to the dizzy heights of average.

    Do we still want Delaney?
    Would we take Sinclair?
    Would Delaney and Taft have let seven in?

    Any hints when retained list will be announced?

    in reply to: I blame Foster #236966
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Really felt for Lobley – as it ‘knocked our duck off’ as they so frequently say in the city I inhabit.
    That was just what it was. The second goal was considerably worse. Ball comes into six yard box – free header. Our defender between scorer and goal actually had his back to the play! In a 12 year olds’ match that would have been considered dire. Who was it, BTW?
    Anyway, at that point – I sagged. They lost the plot.

    We went from crisp passing the week before to abject in one step.
    We have regularly had games this season where passing has been poor and four or five when it has been wretched. Yesterday could have topped them all.

    Beestin was as bad as anyone – still – he’s got his new contract to console him.

    We started the game well enough but that pair of goals at the start just left us gutted. That is no surprise with younger players – I sometimes watch my 9 year old granddaughter’s team fade and die.
    But she’s back the next week, along with her pals, bubbling with confidence and getting a win, like or not.

    As many have pointed out – nobody can field a team containing too many youngsters. We have only been doing this ‘to blood’ them and let them see how tough L2 really is and gain experience. It has been exactly the right way to use up all of those dead games. To me this has been the single positive in our dismal season.

    Nuttall – (From one who’s defended him – worst game thus far.)

    Problem one – Grant could not be chosen to play and act as their general. He’s past it – and even showed that in his rather desperate, tiny cameo appearance.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Goodbye Keith #236956
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    KH did himself few favours with the fans by standing up for you-know-who when all he had to do was grit his teeth and remain silent.
    As our tame Rochdale fan has sort of stated, ‘The guy does know what he’s doing – give him a chance.’
    (After all – he hasn’t really had one yet!)

    Incidentally, how many of those youngsters, knowing the dangers, would have opted not to play yesterday? – Suspiciously close to zero, I’d expect.
    Important lessons were learned – and if that makes ’em go running whimpering into a corner – then so be it. It’s a tough life – get used to it or fail. They are not hothouse plants.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Fans forum #236854
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    I remain dubious but time alone will tell.

    in reply to: Ryan Watson #236798
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Yeah, pretty much what Pat said.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Nutall #236731
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    If we can’t afford to bring in strikers – perhaps we have to try to rebuild broken ones?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Foster #236712
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Stop being coy. We all know it’s A.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Foster #236709
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    I travelled to that Cod ‘ed game in the back of a friend’s dad’s Reliant Robin.
    Yes. Evening.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Foster #236701
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    2nd game, if memory serves.

    in reply to: Hill’s comments #236668
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Shall we just wait until we have seen who has departed and who has been brought in before we all start wetting our pants?

    5 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Nutall #236642
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 118

    Damning with faint praise, this may well be but: I reckon he can be better than Loft.