Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Worksop Town #307944
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    It’s a fair point IFA.
    The other issues are that no side of 11 men – (allowing for several subs) – has had 90+ minutes on the pitch in a single game.
    WE have long known that we have been taking on (allegedly) inferior teams in every single fixture. How can that be deemed proper preparation for going into a higher division?
    Never seen this done before in any pre-season – and really don’t like it.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Wednesday #307902
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    A mate of mine and his daughter are Owls. They are worried. Had a long chat with him on the phone last night. It’s bad!
    Talked to my cousin who used to lead a fans group in Hull until he got poorly. He had some awful tales to tell.
    Should the word ‘corruption’ be coming up quite so often in English football?

    in reply to: What a cracker #307892
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Wasn’t he once described as a CB – or is my ageing braincell playing up?

    in reply to: What a cracker #307891
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Well done, Iron!

    in reply to: News #307802
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    BLT, like you, I have reservations about our ‘Number One GK’ but let us say that he might possibly be capable of significant improvement. What if that potential might soon begin to show through with half a dozen tough games under his belt?
    Just how helpful is it to call him ‘shite?’

    5 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: The first ten games #307758
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Are you sure that you are being reasonable about that, San Fran?

    in reply to: Women’s Euro’s #307684
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    How many times over decades have we seen The Mighty Iron outplay opposition – only to lose?

    in reply to: Billy Sharp’s seven pointers for Promotion #307550
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Unkind.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Skegness Town AFC #307521
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Not according to Transfr Markt.

    in reply to: Skegness Town AFC #307511
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    I only saw 9 minutes of highlights from Skeg but thought that Rory seemed to exude a level of self-confidence I’m not sure that I’ve seen before.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Skegness Town AFC #307492
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Jean Belehouan. Any initial thoughts about Max’s replacement?
    More generally, which recruits may be looking better than squad members from last season?

    in reply to: Whitehall #307486
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Any clues how season ticket sales are going?

    in reply to: Skegness Town AFC #307477
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Good, innit!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Skegness Town AFC #307474
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Well. I know that Rene and you know that and most contributors to Bru know that …

    in reply to: A Vapid Pre-Season #307473
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    As far as I can see we are really short of wingbacks.

    in reply to: And pigs can fly! #307472
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Huh?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Rory Watson #307366
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Sounds pretty much in line with my crumbling brain cells, IK.

    in reply to: Rory Watson #307238
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Indeed.

    in reply to: Rory Watson #307234
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Thanks, DM.
    Without sounding too rude, I hope – are you old enough to recall that very pleasant lad yourself?

    in reply to: Rory Watson #307193
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    I have to repeat that not getting a proper NL GK in is a false economy – a fact that will be realised pretty darn quick if we are entrenched in the bottom 6 and the number of fans in attendance at the AA begins to tail off sharply.
    We really must desperately hope that Mussels and AB have called this one right – that Maison is a genuinely top keeper. Too many fans have not yet witnessed any evidence of this. I truly regret that I am one such.
    You may recall my praise several months ago for the overall high standards of goalkeeping in the NLN last season – and we probably had the best of the bunch. Moreover, on average, the keepers will be better in the NL.
    A feeling down in the very depths of my gut persistently reminds me of time Alan O Meara was thought good enough to keep in the Football League.

    in reply to: Gainsborough Trinity friendly. #307083
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Take some good rainwear with you.

    in reply to: Experienced GK Required #307075
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Sorry Cass. The only thing I will say, is that I am sure that the above quote – even if true – was never made by Knill.
    It’s odd, back in the day, I used to get to hear things on occasion – nowadays, that has been replaced wi’ absolutely nowt.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Experienced GK Required #307072
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    I know a little bit about the Vardy non-signing. His ability was never in question.

    in reply to: Triallists #307052
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Sounds okay, SF, but I suspect it might not be especially cheap.

    in reply to: Get behind your keeper #307051
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    I probably only came up with around half of your list, Rene, but didn’t bother to organise my thinking.
    A splendid and pretty accurate analysis.
    Rockets up rectums required?
    Hopefully, the blue touch paper ignition will only be needed during pre-season games.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Chadwick #306904
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Who doesn’t?
    The clean sheets tell his story more than adequately.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Get behind your keeper #306862
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Ah. Rivals, huh?

    in reply to: Get behind your keeper #306860
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Max was decent and I feel would have improved.
    Where did he go?

    in reply to: Get behind your keeper #306856
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    I sent this to JM.

    in reply to: Get behind your keeper #306855
    lesgeolesgeo
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 25, 2013
    Topics: 114

    Following up on an idea I heard voiced over the weekend – how much money is lost to us – and countless other clubs – by not doing the American ballgame thingy?
    I refer to people going around the ground with a basket – or whatever – delivering snacks to the 90% who really don’t wanna queue.
    That’s a great deal of potential custom. It might only raise a couple of grand net every game with, say, eight to 12 purveyors delivering assorted overpriced goodies and drinks up and down the aisles.
    It could potentially raise a great deal more.
    My only reservation is that they all should be fully trained to minimise disruption to people’s viewing the football.
    If thought and planning went into this – we could probably fund the wages of a couple of players who would otherwise be far too pricey for us.
    Free entrance to the ground for the grafters + £30 each would surely tempt more than a few.
    This is just a first response, SanFran, the idea needs a fair bit of work and attention but, after polishing, it really ought to work.