Forum Replies Created
-
Oh good is it £250 prize per month or a week I missed that.
Try reading para 2 in the link above.
2 users thanked author for this post.
I am also an opinionated sod.
One point I really want to emphasise is that I have said from the outset that the Hamas attack was outrageous & I have not blamed Israel for wanting to retaliate against them.
My objection is attacking Palestinians. Yes, Hamas are embedded there, yes it is difficult to differentiate at times, but they must do so.
My last comment is back to genocide. Israel attacked Gaza knowing that the vast majority of deaths would not be Hamas members. They also attacked the road going South after they suggested that people move South to be safe – again guaranteeing that civilians would die. Today they tracked the border region with Egypt – with the full knowledge that many people were gathering there looking to cross when/if the border was opened. Again, they know that many civilians will die.
This is not a competition (for you JI), but for the last 30 years we have seen many more Palestinian civilians being killed than Israelis.
It is all very sad, and I fear the worst is yet to come.
1 user thanked author for this post.
If there is nothing to report, then they have nothing to tell us.
They will tell us when they have something to report.
It’s not rocket science.
1 user thanked author for this post.
It was Swann who caused the issue that necessiatated Sharp having to stump up the money in the first place.
Based on your logic, it was Wharton’s fault for selling to Swann.
We could go back even further …..
1 user thanked author for this post.
I know it’s been mentioned on other social media but where are our superstar ex players? Even the chairmen of our rivals have contributed yet these two are no where to be seen, maybe it’s time the Ian Botham lounge should be renamed the Alex calvo-Garcia lounge.
How do you know who has contributed? Many people have given anonymously.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Or a sponsored turning cars over on Cleethorpes front, went down well years ago NI, clever bastards taunting Scunny fans thought they were safe, suppose they were really just not the car.
Your immaturity & lack of social awareness shows no limits……
1 user thanked author for this post.
Let’s look back at the antics of some of his players over the last few years. There will be a helluva lot of matches to replay.
What a plonker.
1 user thanked author for this post.
So NLI you were part of Wharton staff leaving the club with the biggest debt on the books shame on you, left the same time as Wharton did we.
A very spiteful and pathetic post. You just can’t help yourself, can you?
3 users thanked author for this post.
With the current and previous incumbents seemingly intent on destroying the club, it does make me wonder if this was pre-planned to finish the club and take the land for selling, and all the histrionics are all part of the theatre.
It was £3 not £3M.
How unlucky are we to get two totally incompetent owners in a row.
Who cares if we win the league and/or get promotion, survival will be success this season.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I too stand with Matt & anyone else who has been picked out for these banning orders.
For a man who has said that he was going to be quiet & let his Board run the business he is making a helluva lot of noise.
4 users thanked author for this post.
Surely Swann won’t want to be known as the past Chairman who destroyed SUFC and broke the hearts of our very loyal supporters.
Swann spent money that he and the club didn’t have and to offset the losses kindly signed over all our assets to his company. I don’t think he gives a toss how he comes across.
I’m no Swann supporter, but at least get your facts right
Swann transferred assets over to his company in return for writing off £11,000,000.
I accept that he, and his managers, were absolutely crap with the use of the money over a long period, but he could have let us keep the assets and the £11M debt. We would have been much worse off than we are now.
On a Radio Humberside interview the EGO said we had gambled but failed.
That is factually incorrect – HE had gambled, we had no say in it. In fact no one had. So who sanctioned the spending season after season that then totaled into the debt of £11 Million – The Chairman had. Yet the club who had no so say in it has to repay its money to the person who spent it !!
It was a gamble, and a bad one. Far too many clubs are doing the same, with dubious owners and no Plan B.
Many of us were not complaining about money being spent in the first few years as we hope for success and promotion. Disaster struck when we failed.
As the owner, Swann could do what he liked, and he did. He even found a mug to buy the club, unfortunately it seems to be that it is another bad ‘un. We shall find out for certain very soon……
2 users thanked author for this post.
Swanns desperation to sell led to the appointment of Hilton so you could argue he is even more culpable both through lacking a watertight sale of the ground+ land and due dilegence of the new owner .
If you go down that route we should blame Wharton for selling out to Swann……
2 users thanked author for this post.
Surely Swann won’t want to be known as the past Chairman who destroyed SUFC and broke the hearts of our very loyal supporters.
Swann spent money that he and the club didn’t have and to offset the losses kindly signed over all our assets to his company. I don’t think he gives a toss how he comes across.
I’m no Swann supporter, but at least get your facts right
Swann transferred assets over to his company in return for writing off £11,000,000.
I accept that he, and his managers, were absolutely crap with the use of the money over a long period, but he could have let us keep the assets and the £11M debt. We would have been much worse off than we are now.
1 user thanked author for this post.
