Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Fines for moving bottles? #208859
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Ah, missed it – had the been goggles on (San Miguel).

    in reply to: Scottish Mickey Mouse goalkeeper again. #208743
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Here’s another one who fancied his chances and got lucky.

    Link not working?

    in reply to: Scottish Mickey Mouse goalkeeper again. #208733
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Well, it was funny, although I felt sorry for Scotland. Was hoping for a rip-roaring display of Celtic passion, blood and thunder, but it ended with tragi-comedy.
    Ferrite, it’s true it was a great shot, but had Marshall been further back, I don’t think Schick would have tried his luck with a one-in-a-million shot.

    in reply to: Scottish Mickey Mouse goalkeeper again. #208664
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Aye, I’d agree.

    It’s a pity about Scotland. Their passion is terrific and the fans create a great atmosphere. I was enjoying the commentary too, intelligent and balanced. But the sight of the hapless Marshall sprinting back to his goal – Forrest Gump style – as the ball flew over his shoulder and he threw himself into the back of the net, was up there with the best/worst of ‘em. Sunday league goal. I think the players and fans all knew it, and they just couldn’t respond.

    I forget who was interviewed after, but he was understandably close to tears.

    Never mind. If they beat England, all will be forgiven and forgotten.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Taking to the knee. #208548
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    WG, many movements have a lot of different views within them. Presumably your wife/girlfriend/daughter/mother expects equal pay, and equality in law with men. But, that doesn’t make her an extreme feminist who wants to remove men from the face of the earth, for example (these types do exist!).

    Back in the 60s and 70s when women were marching for more equality in law and equal pay with men, there were many on both sides would have said they were extreme, mad, and bad.

    They said they were ‘burning their bras’, that they wanted to be fellas, and even that they were Marxists. Especially in the popular press, in the working men’s clubs, in tv sitcoms…. they were all ready to poke fun, talk about the danger to society as we know it, how it was all part of a slippery slope and so on.

    But who now would expect their wife/girlfriend/daughter/mother to do the same job for less money, or be discriminated against in law?

    WG, it’s the same with BLM. Seek out extremists and you’ll find some, which is exactly what the far right is doing in order to frighten people.

    But that doesn’t mean that those who support ‘the knee’ and want to see an end to discrimination and respect for black people are all raving Marxists, any more than your own wife/girlfriend/mother/daughter was an extreme feminist.

    They just want decency, respect and an end to discrimination. And so should we all.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Eriksen #208505
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Looks like he might.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Taking to the knee. #208194
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Or try this one – even better!

    in reply to: Taking to the knee. #208193
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17
    in reply to: England #208047
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    James O’Brien
    @mrjamesob

    “Brexit’s over, Rupert. What do you think you can get them to do next?”

    “Boo their own team while claiming to be patriots?”

    “Let’s make it interesting. You have to get them booing before the game starts, and get a Tory MP to boycott the tournament.”

    “Piece of cake.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: England #208028
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    That’s the point, WG, it’s not that BLM doesn’t care about other people, it’s just that they want to focus on issues affecting black people, which are undeniably worse.

    Think of it as a kind of trade union. The union represents people in an industry. It’s not that the members don’t care about other workers or their conditions, just that they primarily represent their own people. And, just as many other workers show support a particular trade union when it protests, many whites support BLM.

    The difference is that here we’re not just talking about pay and conditions but human rights – something we should all support.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: England #208017
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    The whole ‘take a knee’ thing is pretty straightforward.

    When players take a knee they are showing their support for anti-racism. By logical extension if you boo when players when they take a knee, you are showing support of racism.

    One thing I don’t get about this black lives matter is, if they we’re so concerned as a group about equality wouldn’t it make more sense to start a much bigger group which involves the vast majority of white people who aren’t racist ?

    I understand that point of view WG, but the problem with only saying ‘all lives matter’ is that it loses the focus on black lives, and the problems black people face re. police brutality, racial discrimination and marginalisation more generally – as BRI points out.

    Of course, plenty of white people face marginalisation too, in what has become a very unequal society. If you’re elderly in a depressed northern town, and depend a lot on the state, you’ve got a lot to complain about, as people like Alcy know too well.

    But as a white guy, you’re not marginalised in the labour market because of your colour. You’re not likely to be bullied at school because of it, and you’re much less likely to be stopped, searched, beaten or shot by the police.

    It’s because being black increases the liklihood of all these things that BLM came about.

    in reply to: England #207975
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    This forum is full of too many idiots and fools like the BJ parody who try their best to intimidate others into Nazi-sim!

    There are plenty among the silent majority who love this country and hate everything that the Nazis stand for!

    They daren’t speak out because of the intimidation created by the few racists on this thread who make out anyone who disagrees must be unpatriotic!

    The ignorant racists really hate this country and want to silence those who want to stand for the traditions which make it great – which include taking a knee on behalf of opressed people everywhere!

    And, it’s not difficult to imagine the same monsters roaring their approval in Hitler’s beer hall putch speeches. They’re just lacking another Farage. Had he written his own version of ‘Mein Kampf’, he might have gone even further. What do you reckon, Les?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: England #207955
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Aye, how is it possible to love your country while hating 99% of those who live there?

    in reply to: Howard’s Going #206868
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Y…really enjoyed the Docherty era, so much flair in the team and didn’t cost the earth either, then we ended up with Sexton and the football was dire, bit like the last 3 seasons at Scunny…

    Like all the big clubs, Man. United has become a global brand, and it feels too much like a corporate day out now, that’s if fans can get tickets. I haven’t seen them play live for years, nor particularly want to.

    But the Man U teams of the 70s were some of the best to watch from that era, probably along with Forest and Liverpool. Tommy D was a marmite manager even among the players, but the teams he built at United were electrifying.

    Sexton’s sides like those of SUFC now? Come on!

    in reply to: Howard’s Going #206833
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    utd would probably have won the league if Docherty hadn’t been so stubborn and played Paddy in them games, and as history shows man utd were relegated in 73/74 not 74/75.

    Aye, 73/74 when United were relegated – I might learn to type one of these days.

    But I don’t think it was Tommy Doc’s stubborness which got Roche into the team. Stepney was 34, and TD probably thought – quite resonably – that early in the season was the best time to give Roche match practice, when the pressure was less.

    In any case, one of the three games you mention was a League Cup game (v City when United lost 4-0). So, even if Stepney had played in the other two and United had won them both, they would have still been level on points with Liverpool at the end of the season, but United’s goal average would have remained inferior, barring a couple of 5-nils.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1975%E2%80%9376_Football_League_First_Division

    But, enough of this anoraky stuff – it was a great team United had back then, probably as good as pre-Munich. Plenty of old videos on youtube. Like this one… Would Stepney have stopped Kevin Keegan’s header?

    in reply to: Howard’s Going #206805
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Unforgiving position goalkeeper to many clangers and your toast, always remember Docherty bringing in Paddy Roche in for Stepney at man u and ruining his career, won the first game but then let in 10 against Liverpool , Man city and Arsenal and was dropped for the rest of the season.

    I don’t think it’s right to say those three games ruined Paddy’s career, AWG, he was at United for 9 years 73-82, first as understudy to Alex Stepney who retired in ’78, then Gary Bailey 78-87.

    Roche didn’t play in the season they got relegated (1974-75), when the defence was like a sieve. Then, he only played a couple in Div. 2, aged 24 when the team was at the top of their game, and only a handful the season after, in the 1st Division (the games you mention).

    But, in 1977/78 he played 23 games for United, and the jersey was his into the following season when Gary Bailey took over.

    So overall, his career wasn’t ruined at United, or by the games you mention, but he was a bit error-prone.

    United in the 70s – it’s my ‘special interest’ haha!

    http://www.soccer-ireland.com/manchester-united/paddy-roche.htm

    But you’re right about bringing in a keeper too early. It’s a position which depends a lot on confidence, and in a struggling team with a crap back line it can disappear quickly and make a bad defence even worse, as well as ruin a young lad’s development. I think that’s the risk with Watson.

    in reply to: Hang your head in shame Swann #206712
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    <blockquote

    Yet another who cannot understand what balance actually is.

    So in Alcy’s dictionary:

    ‘Balance’ (noun, verb) = criticizing a party out of power for 11 years.

    And

    ‘Balance’ (noun, verb) = criticizing EP (in power for 8 years) because nobody else does.

    Come on mate, it’s getting dafter with every post!

    in reply to: Hang your head in shame Swann #206643
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Let’s see Alcy, you criticize Swann, not Lord Quibell, because EP is in charge and deserves it, even though others on here and elsewhere are critical too.

    But, despite pensioner poverty, lamentable help for the disabled, and delays in treating the sick which you you and your wife have been directly affected by, you can’t criticize the Tories, apparently because others are critical too.

    Instead, you allegedly ‘bring balance’ by criticizing a party which hasn’t seen power for 11 years!

    That’s daft, isn’t it, old pal, you might as well blame Clement Atlee and Ernest Beverage for building up your expectations in the first place!

    I put it to you that, despite the amount of sympathy and understanding which posters on here and the left in general show towards the predicament of people like yourself, your ‘omerta’ is because you are a biased, card-carrying Tory, quite unable to see beyond the blue fog which clouds your vision, objectivity and common sense.

    Hence your sitting in silence where the party is concerned!

    And that detracts from everything you’ve said about EP, Alcy.

    But it’s not unusual – it’s a major problem in Britain today, that some folk are quite lacking in objectivity where politics is concerned, and commit electoral suicide by voting for a party which will cut, privatize or abolish all they need and rely on.

    in reply to: Hang your head in shame Swann #206621
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Objective and impartial?

    I loathe all parties and all politicians equally.

    When I TRIED to add balance to the decidedly left-biased arguments on this site, the lefties all cried.

    Well I’ve never seen you slag off the Tories but you have complained about pensioner poverty, the NHS and disability – so why not chuck some dirt at those in charge of it?

    Lefties crying? Those were tears of laughter!

    in reply to: Hang your head in shame Swann #206605
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Why talk about Labour? They aren’t in even power now so it’s a moot point. Plus, you don’t even have to vote for them!

    It’s like saying ‘I don’t like Cox, but hey, what about Alan Knill, what did he ever do for us, or Mick Buxton, or Frank Barlow, or Alan Clarke…., or that Lord Quibell’! Completely irrelevant.

    I agree with some of your comments about the club Alcy, but you’ve got to be objective and impartial in your criticism of other stuff as well. Failure to be so could lead others – not least club management – to think you’re just a victim of your own prejudices.

    in reply to: Hang your head in shame Swann #206558
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Come on Alcy, principles which are so high and firm in the case of SUFC, and so low and limp when it comes to the Tories!

    You know very well that lying and ineptitude comes naturally to Johnson and others. Why not call them out on it, especially on pensioner poverty, like you do the club management?

    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    It’s true Wharton did get criticism and even some abuse towards the end of his tenure, but it was nowhere near as sharp and sustained as the criticism which PS has attracted. That’s partly due to the consistently poor performances of the last few seasons, but also the raised expectations followed by deep disappointment, mixed in with a more provocative personal style. His actions have also led to a feeling that the club is belongs to him and him alone, rather than the fans.
    Hence the grief, I think.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Pat, whenever I’ve offered an opinion about something your inevitable response has been “I said no such thing”, or “so and so said no such thing”. You do this regardless of the fact that I haven’t claimed you or anyone else “said” anything. You’ve then gone on to accuse me of lying. If anyone should be in any doubt just look at your comments above. Exactly the same as always.

    In fact your de facto response to any and every opinion I’ve offered is to accuse me of being a liar. All because I referred to pies. Jeez, it’s like a junior school playground. In fact you could do to go back to junior school to understand that when someone offers an opinion about something it does not mean they’re claiming anyone “said” anything.

    The whole post sounds like a bitchy letter from a divorcee to the ex-wife (or husband)!

    in reply to: Bradford City latest defeat thread #206136
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    FYI:
    There is more red tape.
    The fishermen are worse off.
    There is no frictionless trade.
    There is a border in the Irish Sea.
    America is not coming to the rescue.
    And the Vote Leave government is now delivering one of the worst Covid death rate & one of the deepest recessions in the world.

    Where do you get your info from, AWG?

    in reply to: Bradford City latest defeat thread #206135
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Brexit is not going to bad especially on the jab front

    ?????????

    in reply to: Bradford City latest defeat thread #206114
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    What will acting like spoilt brats achieve CT?

    Grow up and support the team you claim to follow.

    I’ll say it one more time you reap what you sow. People like you think they’re blameless when in fact they are very much part of the problem.

    ‘Reap what you sow’ should be nailed to the boardroom wall. It’s been so true these past seasons.
    But with the complacency and arrogance on display here, there’s no reason to suggest 21/22 will be any different.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Bradford City latest defeat thread #206055
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Never in doubt. Job done.

    Club survives a pandemic. Team retains its EFL status.

    Well done Swann and Cox.

    Up the Iron!

    Complacency again.

    in reply to: Swann on the ropes #205991
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    Good piece from Max Bell.

    I don’t know Pawn but his record suggests a stubborn streak which makes him oblivious to those with different opinions. This, together with a need for control from the boardroom to the boot-room to the pitch, has made him dismissive of other points of view, and led him to fall out with managers, players, press, fans, and even the local council.

    It’s also no surprise that some of the most influential people in the club seem to be his own family.

    Despite all this, if plans had come to fruition, with dazzling, ‘sexy’ football, a promotion, and a ‘starchitect’ designed stadium, all would be fine.

    But, it hasn’t. It’s gone from bad to worse, and there’s no sign it’ll get any better. With the club haemorraging cash, the aim is now to batten down the hatches, cut losses and protect business interests. And with no change in sight, the clubs most valuable asset – not the ground but the fans – are in revolt.

    What seems to be needed is a greater willingness to listen and act on the advice of others, and a devolution of decision-making down to those who are professionally capable of exercising it. Of course, they have to have a decent budget to do the job too.

    But perhaps most of all, the club needs to get in touch with its fans again, and a bit of sackcloth and ashes from Swanns Sr and Jr would go a long way to repairing and re-establishing relations. It would cost nothing in financial terms, and the gains could be immense. Give Me Sunshine? We can all wish.

    7 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Enough is enough! PROTEST at GP 8th may #205931
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    To pick the protests that you do value, judge what is important in life. And a protest against someone who paid the players 100% through covid with very little income coming in is a good employer in my books, just because he hasn’t achieved what he wanted doesn’t mean people should turn on him at least he gave it a go.

    Judge what is important in life?? The anger shown on this board reveals that the club is very important in the lives of many.

    Players receiving their pay cheques? It has nothing to do with it. A protest is in the offing because the supporters feel cheated at how badly the club is being run; the dreadful performances, the dreadful league position, the broken promises, the disdain for the fans…

    Come on AWG, you’re looking though the wrong end of the telescope. If you really were a shop steward, you’d understand the value of protest to show the strength of feeling about this. But if your MO with aggrieved workers was merely to ask them if they had been paid, and to consider what is important in life, how on earth did you manage to get elected some ten times in thirty years?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Enough is enough! PROTEST at GP 8th may #205913
    GurnelistaGurnelista
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: April 2, 2014
    Topics: 17

    30 years or more shop steward Gurnelista your correct.

    So what did that teach you about the value of protest?