Forum Replies Created
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
It’s not that dirty seats, tatty flags and blocked drains are major issues in themselves, it’s the message that, and the general neglect of the stadium, gives out. It’s basically saying ‘I don’t really give a toss about the ground and the supporter experience’. He admitted he hasn’t even been down to have a look. How can you expect people to care if it looks like you don’t? This attitude will permeate through the club, from the top down. Where’s the pride in stewardship gone? Lead by example.
12 users thanked author for this post.
There might also be a case to be argued that he seems better at overspending than managing within means, given we almost reached the Championship twice and were being served up decent football with some excellent players. Now that the debt is wiped clean, why not ho again? After all, he may now own the ground, but apparently ‘nothing’s changed’.
1 user thanked author for this post.
National League don’t have any tight financial rules as fair as I’m aware?
Our budget is determined by how many fans we get through the gate, which is determined by how many games we win, which is determined by how good our players are, which is determined by our budget. All connected.
Yes there are some exceptions to the rule but not many.
Thanks for that UTI99, you may well be right with your first point, but the rest of your explanation is too simplistic and doesn’t explain why a lot of budgets of NL clubs is higher than a lot of L2 clubs. All you’ve done is say Swann is managing the budget like a household one now, which everybody knows. It doesn’t help with answering the question, unless you’re implying that those NL clubs are either overspending or have higher revenue from Gate receipts?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Sorry for the negativity but these two initiatives sound like one bright spark’s ideas to ‘come up with a few things we can promote to appease the whingeing gits – something quick and easy and that doesn’t require too much resourcing’.
I think it will take a lot more actual committed engagement to re-engage disenfranchised fans, but agree CT, it’s a start and hopefully more to come.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Keep politics on the non-football side please, unless I’ve got a point to make, then suddenly it’s not a problem.
1 user thanked author for this post.
No. I’ve said twice I’m calling you homophobic because you thanked this post from Big J in your ‘taking to the knee’ thread (it’s still there if you look):
‘Pride is being pushed on the masses to normalise degeneracy! It’s nothing but queers showing how debauched they are with kink and attempts to recruit children to the gay agenda! They want more gays! Society is being engineered to make our kids gay as part of the great replacement and population control!
I doubt Harry Kane has much say on the matter! He has been told by those higher up to wear it to make it seem normal to the masses! Though many can see through the tricks of the libtards to normalise sodomy! Such acts were rightfully seen as disgusting and now they are being normalised to protect the feelings of queer snowflakes who can’t handle criticism for their lifestyle choice!’
Another reason someone like you shouldn’t be on a fans panel. You seem unable to interpret and rationalise basic facts. That’s putting it politely.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Pretty much agree with that apart from the ‘unprecedented success’ part. Two failed League One play off finals isn’t a success.
3 users thanked author for this post.
