[Deereyme66]

Amazing opening post – one could be forgiven for thinking it was a cut and paste propaganda job.

‘wind turbines kill significant numbers of birds.’

Anything up to 100,000 in the UK isn’t it? What you going to do about the 55m birds killed each year by cats? Set up another Tufton St ‘think tank’ to deal with them? Simpler solution – make them safer. Oh, it’s already being looked in to!

[Deereyme66]

‘Indeed, at least one of them has made highly racist remarks, which the mods ignored while the others continue to support him and his views.’

One of them? Who are you referring to? What was said and when? Asking because I don’t recall any instance of this from your so called ‘usual suspects’. Thanks.

[Deereyme66]

‘I’ve no idea what they’re referring to, ‘

I provided a link to wiki about it. Plenty of stuff about it on the internet. No excuse for not bothering to find out. It’s nothing to do with bullying either, it’s about making posters and viewers of this forum aware of the type of person they’re dealing with and sending a warning to anyone contemplating drifting in to that sort of language and rhetoric again that it won’t be tolerated. Thanks

[Deereyme66]

Wtf is a ‘PC drone’? Is it someone who doesn’t try and keep minorities and women down?

[Deereyme66]

It was more than ‘below the belt’, it was daily disgusting racist, misogynist and bigoted posts and continued for far too long. It brought this forum in to disrepute and encouraged others to show their true colours; colours that have no place here or in modern society. Frequently, the language and rhetoric was appalling. It can’t be allowed to happen again.

[Deereyme66]

And I await your reasoned response to my questions posed to you above Bucks. Thanks.

[Deereyme66]

So Bucks, you’re happy for a poster to support Big J and happy for them to promote the ’14 Words’ on here are you? Or is it convenient for you to just ignore or forget about that disgusting period on here? Bravo 👏👏

[Deereyme66]

‘What gives a few women the right to pontificate Deerey,do we have to do everything they want.’

You don’t have to do anything. It’s their opinion, their participation in sports, not yours. If they’re saying they’d rather not wear white shorts it’s their prerogative, not yours or anyone else’s.

[Deereyme66]

Couldn’t give a toss whether you post anything else on the matter but I’ll remind posters why my accusation isn’t ridiculous at all. You frequently supported the worst racist / bigot this forum has ever had, Big J. Along with Alcazar’s disinformation / conspiracy theorists posts, Big J was the reason the non-football forum had to be closed down. In fact, when Big J declared he was leaving you implored him / her to stay citing the ’14 Words’ as one thing you truly believe in. Here’s what that’s about, for anybody who’s forgot or who is not acquainted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words

If it was up to me, you’d have been barred for life for sharing that hate, but it’s not, so here you are. My other points about alternative leaders were questions not accusations, and fair ones I believe; Nick Griffin is quoted in the wiki piece as being a fan of the 14 Words. I haven’t once called you a Nazi either.

[Deereyme66]

‘Quick, new brief guys! No need to nastily lay in to hard working doctors and consultants!’

[Deereyme66]

Don’t mention 55 Tufton Street, it makes the poor lad very sleepy.

[Deereyme66]

Tony said he was disappointed we went behind because that wasn’t the plan. That’s a relief.

[Deereyme66]

What gives you the right to pontificate about sports women preferring not to wear white shorts? You don’t even think women should be allowed at football matches ffs.

[Deereyme66]

This see you next Tuesday…

Still hassling Vine from prison I see too. These are the type of people who bandy ‘snowflake’ around. Scum.

https://www.nottinghampost.com/news/local-news/sexist-alex-belfield-videos-still-7635604

[Deereyme66]

Nothing to do with crap humour or being ‘snowflakes’ (just a poor excuse to mock people who call you out). As for England players:

During the summer, England’s Beth Mead said the issue had been raised as soon as the new Lionesses kit was unveiled for the European Championship.

“It’s something we’ve fed back to Nike,” said Mead. “Hopefully they’re going to change that [the colour]. It’s very nice to have an all-white kit but sometimes it’s not practical when it’s the time of the month.”

1 user thanked author for this post.

Wednesdayite

[Deereyme66]

Lol, you were so offended you left Alcy. Snowflakes you say? Hmm…..

3 users thanked author for this post.

BobbyGmeister, open hearth iron, alcazar

[Deereyme66]

Man U, 3rd round. Doddle.

[Deereyme66]

Party of vipers. And this:

BREAKING:

Liz Truss has appointed Dominic Johnson, Tory donor & co-founder of Somerset Capital with Rees-Mogg, as trade minister

Announcement quietly dropped on https://t.co/Ykkwe7cwEd

He's being handed a peerage to boot

Confirms @fletcherr scoophttps://t.co/MWArxD06gF pic.twitter.com/dEQaVpVaGc

— Steven Swinford (@Steven_Swinford) October 2, 2022

[Deereyme66]

Corrupt t***s

BREAKING:

Liz Truss has appointed Dominic Johnson, Tory donor & co-founder of Somerset Capital with Rees-Mogg, as trade minister

Announcement quietly dropped on https://t.co/Ykkwe7cwEd

He's being handed a peerage to boot

Confirms @fletcherr scoophttps://t.co/MWArxD06gF pic.twitter.com/dEQaVpVaGc

— Steven Swinford (@Steven_Swinford) October 2, 2022

[Deereyme66]

They haven’t a feckin clue, and as they say in Barnsley, ‘thy int a prayer lad!’

[Deereyme66]

Are the Tories ever right about anything? No wonder they’re so far behind in opinion polls. It would be funny if they weren’t causing so much misery for millions.

[Deereyme66]

‘Oh, and the Tories love nothing more than a Labour party that thinks it’s already won the next election.’.

Nope, you’ve been corrected on that a day a two ago. It really doesn’t think it’s won anything. You can keep saying it as much as you like. It’s just one in a long line of fabrications and untruths.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Siderite

[Deereyme66]

Typical Tory deflection: ‘I know let’s pick out those doctors and consultants on high income! That’ll excuse it!’ Tactics like this are partly why people call Tories the nasty party.

[Deereyme66]

‘You’re even more naive than me if you think the BBC didn’t select the pensions person they interviewed based on their views over Brexit.’

It was a phone in programme love: ‘Any Answers’ to be precise. Thanks.

[Deereyme66]

What a lame excuse for a post Lord Kitchener. Who gives a toss what you think of past and present Labour Party leaders? This in particular:

‘Now we are blessed with the presence of another leader of the opposition, one Keir Starmer. I haven’t had the chance to analyse this one. A career politician, but almost anonymous, insomuch as nobody had ever heard of him. Judging by what I have seen of him so far, I think he is labour’s version of Theresa May, only more of an old woman.’

What you mean is, you’d never heard of him. I’m sure the earth will move when you provide your expert analysis of his credentials but no doubt it would be just be an opportunity to find faults with him like you have with the previous. You admit to knowing nothing about him but claim he’s a ‘career politician’? Yes, clearly you know nothing about him.

I know you’d prefer a Party in power that was more akin to the BNP or the NF based on your previous racist views on here and gushing praise of Big Job, Boris, Trump and Farage, so your criticism of Labour Party leaders seems hollow. What do you want from a Pary leader? Bit more Trump, Farage, Moseley, Griffin?

[Deereyme66]

‘Is that simple enough for you?’

Is that the backstory for Liz and Kwasi’s fiscal strategy? Carry on trying to defend Bucks. Carry on…

[Deereyme66]

‘Of course the Tories have been to blame for this as much as Labour.’

Lol, er, Labour? Why are you bringing a polictal party in to it who have had no power or influence over it? This shiteshow is firmly on your Party’s shoulders.

[Deereyme66]

Not as ridiculous as your comment awaywego. Daft bugger

1 user thanked author for this post.

BobbyGmeister

[Deereyme66]

Just Iron wrote:

You’re definitely being sucked in to making it personal rather than stating your case, Sidey. A pity .. because you’re pretty good at the latter whereas the former diminishes you.

That depends if you agree or not with Bucksiron

[Deereyme66]

Tbh, I’ve given up bothering reading Bucks’ epistles. It’s just the same ‘net zero to blame’ line that’s been popular among certain Tories for years now. Bucks is an archetypal ideologue; bit like Truss and Kwarteng. They’ve made their minds up and won’t deviate despite rational arguments against. Debating with them is futile. The past has shown that Bucks rarely answers pertinent questioning and often lies low or disappears when it becomes apparent that he’s defending the indefensible. Then there’s the straw manning and gas lighting (latest example the other day regarding ‘insults’). I’ve heard so many people in trusted positions on TV and radio explaining the lunacy of the mini-budget (just this afternoon a financial expert and Chair of a Pensions Fund on R4 explaining how Brexit and lack of productivity are the key issues that need addressing not tax reductions for high earners and net zero) that I’m hardly going to take much notice of an idealogue on Bru!

[Author]

Posts