Forum Replies Created
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
Shame some of our players couldn’t pass the ball as successfully as he passed his fag, they wouldn’t have got it back like he did.
3 users thanked author for this post.
And standing on one leg.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Why so ageist? How old were Cox, Stanton, Housham, Butler, Ridley, Sparrow, Haks etc when they made their debuts for the Iron.
Some of our worst signings ever have been ‘experienced’.It suits your argument to forget experienced signings like Torpey, Beagrie, Mussy, Crozzer, Barra. Gilks et al and focus on Iwelumo, Ormondroyd, Horsfield, Johnson and the others.
5 users thanked author for this post.
Bunney – 186 appearances in 10 seasons, company for Hallam?
1 user thanked author for this post.
I know that mick, all I’m saying is he’s under 20, cheap and has been at Rochdale. What more does Hill want? Personally I don’t see the point of even giving trials to the type of player we don’t need.
21yo keeper
18yo FB
Player who’s hardly played for 5 seasons.6 users thanked author for this post.
Give it up until we actually sign some players with experience and hopefully some quality. If more than 6 of those start the first league game we’ve got no chance.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Scored 2 – the plan must be coming together.
1 user thanked author for this post.
“Today, Leanne Mayo has stepped down from the Chief Executive Officer role. Leanne is staying on as a director.”
WHY?
SUFC directors salary must be decent then! Shame the players salary isn’t as good as the off-field staff.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Have the questions and answers been approved?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Where do you get your weed from cass, it sounds seriously good shit.
I got it from UTI99, can’t you tell! I probably shouldn’t have used it all at once though.
1 user thanked author for this post.
The youth part of the plan will be OK, it’s cheap. The problem might lie with the experience needed for balance which could be too expensive at the moment. That will be cheaper when the offerings have been picked over and just the oddments are left.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Is it reasonable to assume that if any of the trialists had been really impressive we might have signed them up after a week?
Are they a bunch of duffers who will be shipped out and another load brought in?
Are they just using us to get fit until they get a better offer?
Does anybody recognise a trialist face or two from the training photos?1 user thanked author for this post.
The season is 5 1/2 weeks away yet.
Our first home friendly isn’t for another 2 1/2 weeks.
The National League also doesn’t have a transfer window so we can add to the squad as and when players become available. Relax.You are completely (maybe deliberately) missing the point that les and others are making. Yes, we have 5 1/2 weeks until the season starts so we could sign players then and later but the players then have to integrate and probably catch up fitness wise. Surely even a blinkered “I’ll clap whatever” like you can see how problematic this is. We can sign 10 players in December, integrate them by February and have them fit for March just in time to participate in next seasons relegation. All players need to be ready to go in 4-5 weeks to give us the best chance of survival.
Basic economics.
More income = more available for expenditure, no argument with that. Who told you that additional income from season ticket sales would be used for Hill’s budget was the question.
4 users thanked author for this post.
, 
