Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Could do with a recording of Nathan Jones HT team talk at Luton!!
Similar to Bolton game, very little inclination to attack until we went behind. If Cox wants to play defensively and hope to score on the counter attack then fair enough, that’s his game plan. (Wouldn’t be mine) But please don’t treat us like idiots and give us this b******t about how we’re going to attack the opposition.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Goal – no goal – goal – no goal. Comedy gold!
Cox says he wants to be positive, 2-0 win if he is.
What he says and what he does often don’t coincide. Because of Cheltenham’s league position he’ll, once again, overestimate the opposition’s ability and set up to nullify a perceived threat. We have attacking players with enough pace and ability to threaten any team in this league if they’re allowed to do what they do best.
A few weeks ago Loft wouldn’t have been in most peoples first XI never mind a POTY contender! Credit to him, let’s hope his current form continues.
He didn’t kick the player in the face?
He can’t have done can he. As I said earlier, had the player been kicked in the face the physio would have been on for a concussion check and necessary treatment. I can only think the ref gave it for “intent”, players don’t actually have to make contact if they throw a punch or shove their head towards another. Very harsh IMO but as DSGM said, Bedeau gave the ref the opportunity to get it wrong.
“The second half subs and performance showed there was intention to win the game”
That was when we were one down Cliff and I’d suggest getting back level was the extent of the ambition. I wonder if those changes would have been made at HT if the score had been 0-0?
Doesn’t a kick in the face usually result in a visit from the physio?
Does anybody think that we had any intention to try and win that game? Cox moaning about dodgy penalties against, maybe if we got in the oppositions penalty area more often we might get a few ourselves!
There’s also the option of playing Rowe & Clarke at FB/CB, both have done it before. The option NOT to consider (please) is 3 CBs.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Agree 100%. I fear the management will see this as a tough game and go back to the “looking for a point” set up. Hope I’m wrong! I think it’s a winnable game if we set up to win it.
Decent bench too, best for a while.
I’m sure there will be a massive queue for his services. I’m hoping we’re not in it!
No chance of pleasing everybody of course, personally I have a problem with black kits and visibility. I even think all the claret & blues are a bit on the dark side, blue shorts would help but I too went for the stripes. I liked the white for the away kit and wouldn’t mind the yellow as third.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Maybe you should join one of the groups if you’re so interested marty.
Why is 10 man Newport beating the Cods a problem for anybody?
Lol at Replica Pistol.
YOU were the one who had a mini tantrum at me because I pointed out that I’d told you all so from the start.
As for criticising Swann, look back and see who was the first and consistent critic.
No brown-nosing for me. He even tried to come on here for a showdown, answered one question with a lie, ducked the next and then the usual w*nkers ruined it, despite having been asked by SST not to do so.
Go on, check back who was the first…and then come on and apologise…oh…sorry, you lefties don’t do apologies cos you think you’re never wrong.
Grow up Deerey.
You can admit YOU WERE WRONG sometimes.
And yes, it does mean ALCAZAR WAS RIGHT.Just a touch ME ME ME isn’t it? Please sir! Me sir! Me sir!
We would have to trust that any new owner negotiates a reasonable rent on a long term basis before buying. Anybody with any sort of business brain should be capable of this so hopefully shouldn’t be too problematic.
It was my hand but I know what you mean.
Missing words round? Is it cock?
Just listened to Cox’s interview and he said he only wanted to bring in players that are better than what we’ve got…so I assume he doesn’t rate Rowe and he’s here as first choice right back.
Makes you wonder on what evidence Cox has based his “better than we’ve got”
opinion. Smacks a bit of ‘agent speak’ unless Karacan remembers him from Reading.Will Grigg on his way to MK – shame.
22 years old, 1 league appearance?????????????????????????
Rowe, McGahey, Hornshaw, Scunny Bunny and then Howe.
Very strange.We could do with a couple in certainly but, as we are already overloaded, it’s hard to see how we can. It would be good to shift 5 or 6 but as none of them will be moving upwards and the NL might not finish the season they won’t be going there either. Doesn’t help that some of them are crocked and some are not even NL standard anyway.
Absolutely, but had he played the right players in their correct positions, using a system with which they were familiar, results just might have been better.
DANGER TIME!! Kloppo is looking for a CB in the £80m price bracket and is struggling to find one. I guess we’d let Manny go for close to that.
PS to do list asap:-
New contracts for Onariase, Rowe, Karacan, Gilliead
Sign Taft
Go for it Peter.1 user thanked author for this post.
Brilliant result but I have to make one comment meant to be constructive not negative.
We had 80 minutes against a GK making his league debut and he didn’t have to make a save.I thought his brief was to identify young players and I read that Howard was responsible for Karacan being here.
Makes those points gifted to Southend, Grimsby, Stevenage and Barrow even more sickening doesn’t it.Have a look at the Haysey goal againt Colchester on SUFC Twitter. Wouldn’t mind one of those tonight but not sure anybody likely to be playing has that ability.
I’m just hoping the manager doesn’t think a point will be a good result and sets out to get one. It seldom works for us. I agree fitness/fatigue is likely to be a major problem.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
AuthorPosts