Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: JOHN STAFF #213299
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Interesting article on the OWS?

    ” If you are a confident, friendly, reliable and an excellent communicator and you want to work on matchdays at the Sands Venue Stadium then we want to hear from you.
    The 50-50 Draw will be returning at the Exeter City game on September 11th and the club require sellers to be part of the matchday team.
    Sellers will be required from 1.00pm until just after kick-off on Saturday fixtures with a flat fee paid per game.”

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Snakes and ladders #213298
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    “Let us look at the player judgement of Mr Cox – after 2 training sessions and a friendly he wanted KDT !!”

    But Sanfran he’s realised that he’s made a mistake, he’s not continually picking KDT trying to prove himself right. If he’s got it wrong this time hopefully he’ll react the same way.

    in reply to: Northampton (a) #213297
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I refer you to my earlier post on this thread repeated below, it was ever thus:-

    September 3, 2021 at 11:34 am
    Big test for Cox this Saturday because, unlike in recent weeks, he has options and we won the last match. Who gets in out of Scrimshaw, Wood, Perry & Hackney and who misses out? Good luck Neil, if we lose then, as far as some Bruers are concerned, you’ll have picked the wrong team for sure!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Northampton (a) #213286
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    You’re right, nor if we’d won on Saturday.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Neil Cox – Ventriloquist? #213285
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Thanks Haysie.

    in reply to: Snakes and ladders #213277
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Nothing, Cox has signed 2 players he believes are better. He can’t be blamed for that unless he’s proved wrong. IF he’s wrong and they are no better than Pugh he should only be blasted if he keeps picking them before Pugh anyway. He did say recently that Pugh was his first choice RB so room for all 3 you would think.

    in reply to: At what point do we consider the manager is the problem? #213253
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Rather have Wilson or O’Malley than Green the way he’s been performing.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Northampton (a) #213246
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Makes it easy for the opposition too, this is how we play so this what Scunthorpe will do to counter it. Get a grip Neil and let the other team worry about us for a change. Old school 2-3-5 on Saturday and see what they make of that!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Northampton (a) #213199
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I understand your frustration Sanfran but Cox’s reputation (such that it is) is at stake here. If Thompson is better than O’Malley then he must play, if he isn’t then why is he here. Similarly if Wood and Hackney are better than Pugh then they have to play or their signings are a massive mistake. Clearly Cox believes he needed better than he had, time will tell if he was right.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Northampton (a) #213177
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Our young’uns who have all done so well?
    On the bench if they are lucky.
    Older players, anyone here last year and loanees?
    In.

    You are Neil Cox and I claim my £5

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Northampton (a) #213102
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Big test for Cox this Saturday because, unlike in recent weeks, he has options and we won the last match. Who gets in out of Scrimshaw, Wood, Perry & Hackney and who misses out? Good luck Neil, if we lose then, as far as some Bruers are concerned, you’ll have picked the wrong team for sure!

    in reply to: Hayden Hackney #213070
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Several recent loanees have been bench warmers but that was because they weren’t good enough. I’ve said before that IMO loanees should be nailed on to start (Yates, Toney, Gabriel, Lansbury, Cork) otherwise the loan would seem pointless (Thomas, Miller, Liddle, Ugbo et al).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Hayden Hackney #213035
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    It looks possible(?) that Cox might be favouring a 5-3-2 set up in tha absence of quality wingers. He’s said, wrongly IMO, that Pugh is his first choice RB so, if we need 3 fit CMs every week then Kenyon, Perry, Beestin, Wood & Hackney looks OK. If Kenyon fails to improve then Pugh could supplement and, who knows, Hallam might be fit occasionally too.

    in reply to: Hayden Hackney #213011
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Can’t remember the name of last years Middlesbrough loanee as he didn’t play much. Surely this one must be better.

    in reply to: Generous penalty #212916
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Certainly looked harsh at first sight but, having seen the highlights, the Tranmere defender initially indicated his chest but then gave up. No mass protest from the rest suggesting they weren’t too unhappy. As you say, very disappointing had one like that gone against us. I’m sure one will, things like that tend to even out over a season.

    in reply to: Apologies Jarvo #212910
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I also remember Damian Henderson (from Scarborough I think) Manager Richard Money described him as “the best player of his type in the division” and he was right! Sadly his ‘type’ was absolute donkey.

    in reply to: Charles Hagan? #212889
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Or transfer him to Coolsilk?

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Charles Hagan? #212885
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I thought we only had room for one before Scrimshaw came, I’m sure Cox said we needed to move one out to bring in the other he wanted. As WG said – how the hell do we shift KDT without paying him up. Is getting anybody else out on loan a possibility?

    in reply to: Apologies Jarvo #212864
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    “The worst player we have ever signed” is cruel, inaccurate, unhelpful, confidence-destroying and a classic knee-jerk response.”

    Only used nowadays by people too young to remember Tomi Ameobi les.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Apologies Jarvo #212837
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    I think you’re right les, we’re talking about lower league players here not internationals. Keep it simple at the start and hopefully move upwards from there.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: So Much To Give us Cheer. #212792
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Looks like Perry & Scrimshaw isolating then. Could be worse, we could be Tranmere, 73% possession and no shots on target. Although 27% possession in a home game is not something I want to see very often (or ever again)

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Apologies Jarvo #212790
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Not being a massive goal threat is not really a great recommendation for a striker, particularly a lone one. On the plus side he can’t have been anywhere near match fit, when did he last play?

    in reply to: Wakey wakey Ernest the fans have! #212789
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Could be worse Barcelona have a £1.15 billion loss and theirs hasn’t been written off.

    Has ours? Have I missed something?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Latest club statement #212757
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Excerpt:- “There have also been comments regarding the cleanliness of seats. All of the seats were washed prior to the start of the season.”

    If you use this as a benchmark for the validity of the entire content of the statement then the value becomes questionable. (Unless, of course, “prior to the start of the season” means July 2020)

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Wakey wakey Ernest the fans have! #212703
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    No no NI, he wants the fans IN. It’s the customers he wants OUT.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Wakey wakey Ernest the fans have! #212694
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    les!!!!!!! He’s posted again but totally ignored you!! Very rude IMO.
    (But not entirely unexpected)

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Bobbing Log floats aloft hail Peter the Turd #212679
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Oh, WG. You know not what you say.
    I know DH personally and many who have connections to him. I also knew his father.

    Was his father Lloyd George?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Wakey wakey Ernest the fans have! #212678
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Nice try les. Your chances of an answer are slightly less than clean seats at GP.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: At what point do we consider the manager is the problem? #212562
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    He has brought in players, characters, that have bought in to the way he wants to play the game – or so we are told! However it appears, now they are here, they have their own ideas of how to play the game and have little interest in Cox’s ideas. Can’t entirely blame them but that’s not really how it should work is it?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Sell the club #212555
    cassidystashcassidystash
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: January 4, 2014
    Topics: 159

    Still the debt to the EFL though.

    2 users thanked author for this post.