Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
… it’s only a rumour and maybe not £1500 but don’t be naive into to thinking it’ll be less than a grand a week.
The wages were published online recently, if you were fast enough to see them before they were removed. Beck was not listed amongst them, so the information came before he as signed. From the information you could see that the club is clearly sticking to its guns – and so he’ll be on something befitting the new wage structure, which will indeed be less than grand a week.
‘Beck rumoured to be on £1500 a week’
Where’s this rumour coming from awaywego? Staggered if it’s true.
I doubt Michelle and the board would sanction busting the wage ceiling that was put in for new contracts, so I’m sure he’ll actually be on an amount that fits that, rather than what the rumour is suggesting.
Staging a load of tribute bands and local acts will never ever attract 10,000 people for each day. In fact, it’d be lucky to get 500 – 1,000. It represents a massive financial risk.
I’ve seen around 15 acts on the line up… things can only get better…
There are a few one hit wonders and blasts from the past. None of the acts appeal to me in the slightest. I am hoping they have a few decent headliners up their sleeve, otherwise I fear it will flop.Completely underwhelming so far.
It Seems A Tom Zanetti Is The Promoter
It doesn’t actually say that.
True.
“ Tom Zanetti is bringing a 3 day festival to Scunthorpe on May Bank Holiday Weekend “
It’s a turn of phrase and could just mean he’s the headliner.
I’m not saying he isn’t the promoter, by the way. Just that he might not be, there’s been no real clarity thus far.
It Seems A Tom Zanetti Is The Promoter
It doesn’t actually say that.
I sincerely hope that the football club has protected itself financially by having a separate company put this festival event on, or that their only real involvement is just hiring out the stadium to whichever events organisation is actually putting it on. 10,000 people per day is a very very big ask.
Exactly. Very few coming in from the other side either, so I don’t see why Roberts is some kind of fall guy. Neither goals last night came from crosses in to Beck, and none of the other decent chances came from crosses from the flanks either. More of an attacking force due to Wreh’s inclusion and performance rather than less cutting in from Roberts IMO. Anyhow, just my opinion, don’t take ‘picky’ personally. ‘Picky argument’ is just an observation
We have relied on Roberts doing this, imho, sometimes to the detriment of the ‘other things’ I mentioned. Last night he was in a position where he did it much less, and consequently we attacked in a ‘different’ way. Some crosses went in. I still think there’s scope for even more.
So you’re saying Roberts habit of frequently cutting inside, like Beestin was doing last light incidentally, limits decent crosses? If there was more threat and goal scoring opportunities from crossing instead of cutting in at any one time, he might be doing it more. The other flank is available too. Seems a bit of a picky argument.
You’re the one being picky.
We’ve got 12-feet tall Beck in the side and haven’t been banging in crosses to him, preferring instead to stick with a system in which Roberts is played in a position where he’s likely to cut in and try and shoot rather than cross. Very few coming from the other side, either.
What things does it limit?
How many decent crosses have you seen put in this season?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Yeah, terrible tactic allowing Roberts all those goals.
Nobody’s complaining about the goals, just the fact that Roberts in that position limits other things.
Too early to truly say as it was only one game, but this morning I’m thinking “Is Wreh the key that finally unlocks us as an all-round force?”
I thought he was exceptional in the first half against a fairly decent Darlington. Movement, speed and beef. Just what the doctor ordered.
I also think he helped Beck ,he clearly improved with the room provided,the formation too was a very visible 4-4-2 when we formed up defensively.All we need now is for Roberts to get clattered.
That would be game over.That would be a total disaster.
I’m really looking forward to tonight’s match. I think we could (should) see a focused Iron, acutely aware of ‘the Whitehall problem’ and determined to show that the squad has strength in depth and that they can really do something without him. However, equally, they may be in headless chicken mode and spend an hour or so pumping balls up to Beck and just expecting something to happen, without really having worked out how to make it happen around him.
No Whitehall = showing up to a gunfight with a banana.
I think Fadera might just be the guy to open up defences. I’d want to see him start every game and if it ain’t working – bring him off early.
But if it does work it will be coz many defences at this level cannot cope with pace.Take him off early and replace him with what? Something that most are saying doesn’t work?
Surely better to start with that, just in case it kicks into life, and if it doesn’t then bring Mo on as a high impact sub..?
… we haven’t won enough games.
It’s vital that we win all 2,742 of our remaining games this season.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Down to a 2 horse race (possibly) after last night’s results.
A little too early to say that, imho.
4 users thanked author for this post.
My point is, no real point screaming about the end of the world unless it’s nigh… Certainly no point in doing so in mid-November etc etc. Rounds of f**ks acceptable for Butler when i) it’s mathematically impossible to go up as Champions, and ii) when we can’t make the Play Offs.
True though isn’t it?
Just been having a mutual “should have, could have” moan with a Mackem mate!
Could’ve been top all season and then f**ked it up with six games to go.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Aren’t their posts pre vetted by mods?
On his Twitter account he says the moderators took it down but then put it back up again when he argued the toss. It appears to have been taken down again, though.
I can’t see it. Mods maybe deleted it.
You’d hope so, wouldn’t you? It’s in breach of GDPR, I’d wager – as well as against common decency.
I must be missing something, but what’s the point of throwing money at new players when you haven’t got a cat in hells chance of being promoted this season? It doesn’t make sense.
Since when have practising fantasists and serial conmen made any sense?
1 user thanked author for this post.
February 18, 2025 at 10:26 am in reply to: Yet another…’what have you been listening today?’ Thread #299138went a couple of weeks back and I thought Timothee Chalamet was excellent as Dylan
For those who are interested in Dylan, I believe A Complete Unknown is on TV streaming services from 25th February. The Robbie Williams film is also worth a watch and that’s now available on TV.
It’ll be on some land off Warren Road.
Given the characters that passed the FA’s fit and proper person’s test, it isn’t exactly a ringing endorsement.
It’s not fit for purpose.
Put another way he did better for the team getting his chance when Whitehall is out than Elliot ever did.
I was not a particular fan of Elliott either, but that’s nonsense.
2 users thanked author for this post.
My guess is he’ll start him and also Starbuck, who will be getting up the wing and pinging crosses onto his head.
NEXT!
Almost more than any Scunthorpe United player I’ve ever seen, those who rate him can’t see what he does wrong and those who slate him can’t see what he does right.
Clunan is like the curate’s egg but he does lack the strength I’m talking about.
He’s like the dog’s egg.
-
AuthorPosts