[alcazar]

Going down again I predict.
And I think… Yes I really do, that it’s the preferred option. 🙄

But what our mastermind directors haven’t taken into account is the standard of players we had last time around, when they took over.
Now we haven’t.
And we don’t look like attracting any, let alone signing any.
Our trajectory is downwards.
Might we be playing Gainsborough, Cleethorpes etc in a couple of years?

[alcazar]

If the club don’t sack him soon, we might as well pack it in.
He’s doing for us😡

[alcazar]

Looks like another pin the tail on the donkey team selection.
Could do with that lad from Barnsley back.

[alcazar]

Well thanks for that.
🙂

[alcazar]

Deereyme66 wrote:

‘If I was chairperson I’d be asking the question of the lack of quality in recruitment.AB has got that large a hand to play he’s absolutely lost.’

Maybe the BoD should ask themselves why they didn’t recruit a person to oversee recruitment?

Or why they didn’t recruit a decent manager with experience, instead of the nice guy they knew, who failed at Donny Rovers Ladies?

[alcazar]

Deereyme66 wrote:

I-A does what I-A does (you’re not alone so don’t feel too special). Plenty of disagreements in the past but you probably missed all that having taken your ball home to the dark side slagging off Bru ;)

The abuse I was receiving, un-moderated, I might add, was the final straw in a very stressful time.
The slagging was well merited.
If the cap fits, and all that.
😉

[alcazar]

cassidystash wrote:

Stockport have recalled a loanee because he’s not getting game time. Might force Butler’s hand on team selection?

Whilst I see the parents club’s point, I don’t think they should have any input on who plays for us, or doesn’t.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Rene Artois

[alcazar]

“Good luck Michelle”???
Except that it was Michelle who both appointed him, and extended his contract… not once, but twice 🙄

1 user thanked author for this post.

RoamingBull

[alcazar]

No WiFi where I am.
😉

[alcazar]

Deereyme66 wrote:

Even by your standards that’s a long ‘muhahahaha…’. Don’t do yourself an injury. Still, great way to go I guess ;)

I see your backup “chum” is still following me too.
Fancy living rent free in SO many heads.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂*
* Muahahahahahahahaha

[alcazar]

But it didn’t.
I still have more than you.
But it wasn’t me who brought up who was better educated.
Back to the drawing board Brainiac.
😂

[alcazar]

Nope.
Your massive brain has farted again.
Unless, of course, you’d like to post actual proof…?
No?
Thought not.
Muahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[alcazar]

Ironawe wrote:

I re-read the news piece on the home page of this website – Butler confirms no more signings after Parker. How wrong did he get it……. everything quoted in that article is some distance from reality now.

I think Butler himself is some distance from reality.

[alcazar]

Why, thank you sir.

[alcazar]

I have someone

[alcazar]

I have been known to clear an entire supermarket aisle with a single SBD.

[alcazar]

Grace at her best.
I had such a crush on her.

[alcazar]

Deereyme66 wrote:

Their question about whether union members are allowed to vote on donations to the Labour Party is moot. It completely ignores the historical link between the two (not some grifting crypto swindle) and the fact members can leave any union whenever they wish.

The biggest grift in bringing TUs in to the argument is classic Reform trying to exploit the fact that a proportion of members didn’t support Starmer. Most swivel heads will be oblivious to this of course as they’re too busy beating up their partners and googling union flag related tat whilst their hero leaders spunk their donations on oysters, coke, balaclavas.

More Deerey biased bullshit from our resident super brain.
You just embarrass yourself with slavering posts like the above.

[alcazar]

Northumbiron wrote:

The fact that Farage’s comments on Trade Unions was a piece of classic whataboutery has a certain irony to it as well.

When Liebour spend their time blaming previous governments for any failures, is that not “whataboutery”?
Or do we just accept that because we love Liebour?

[alcazar]

Deereyme66 wrote:

You claim to be balanced but often spout similar lines as Farage and Reform. This being one.

Ah, I knew you’d misunderstood.
I never, ever claimed to be balanced. Nor would I.
What I used to try and get you to understand was the need to see both sides of an argument, however distasteful you find the process.
But your massive brain couldn’t grasp it. Still apparently can’t.

[alcazar]

64 wrote:

being on sites like this is attention seeking ,attacking it’s greatest ever contributors all the time could be seen as such. I’d rather garner meaningless attention on a pointless site like this for trivial nonsense

than post my love for the likes of Tommy Robinson

etc on Twitter.
Perhaps you should wind you neck in a bit when you’re living in the same glass house

Didn’t know you were a fan?

[alcazar]

Maybe they don’t want to lose you?

[alcazar]

Deereyme66 wrote:

‘Why do trades unions donate to politicians, indeed why are they even allowed to? Do their members get a say?’

Thus spoke Farage.

And your point, oh intelligent one?

[alcazar]

Why does anyone make donations to anything?
Because they like or support the idea.
I have little disposable income, but was quick to donate £50 to the club when they needed it.
Why do trades unions donate to politicians, indeed why are they even allowed to? Do their members get a say?
But surely, while we ALLOW political donations, can we choose who can and who can’t donate?
Wouldn’t it be better if we removed the trough entirely?
Make politicians live off their salaries?
Make councillors do their jobs for free, just reimbursing them any wages lost, and genuine costs?
Better still, remove politics entirely from local government. (Then we’d see the back of the likes of the local Scunny councillor who proudly announced that HE would vote AGAINST anything the Tories brought in…even if it was in his constituent’s best interests.
What a turd.)
We might get some HONEST politicians then.

[alcazar]

Deereyme66 wrote:

Not sure about that Alcy. Don’t know about Reid and Slick but I think Liz Frazer’s vocals may have been double tracked on later Cocteau Twins stuff like Heaven and Las Vegas. Early stuff sounds more single track.

Interesting though. Where are you getting this info about who’s been double or single tracked btw? Or is it based on what you’re hearing on the tracks? Given the amount of female singers in the world, you must have heard a large percentage of them to claim many have been double tracked?

Those I’ve seen, then heard on an expensive stereo. So those I’ve had an interest in.
Many many others, you just listen on a decent stereo setup, it’s usually obvious.

You MAY be right regarding later Cocteau Twins, but have a listen to Liz on the Siren Song.
Couple of others worth a mention were Celia Humphris and the late Sandy Denny, both of whom I was lucky to see live, SD with both Fairport and Fotheringay.
I suppose Sonja Kristina ought to sneak in too.

Source: YouTube https://share.google/AfJwfBUhbQprV5wid

[alcazar]

Very few female singers have the voice without at least double tracking.
Some, like Madonna, need quadruple tracking.
Ones I can think of that can go it alone:
Liz Fraser.
Grace Slick
Hannah Reid.
There were others, sadly passed.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Iron-awe

[alcazar]

One is an attention seeker and populist, the other just doing what politicians do.
I loathe them both.

[alcazar]

Iron-awe wrote:

alcazar wrote:

Disgusting.
I have seen NOT ONE report of any unrest, violence at either protest.
I HAVE seen reports of police thuggery which doesn’t surprise me one jot.

Well if you don’t look you won’t see will you Mr Right Wing Firebrand

I’ve looked, Mr Left Wing Libtard

[alcazar]

Good away win.
Currently averaging a point a game.
Would 46 points keep us up?

1 user thanked author for this post.

Rene Artois

[alcazar]

That was my initial thought.
But if it is, will it last beyond the first goal, whichever team scores it?

[Author]

Posts