Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Inept Government #245680
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    You can make all the excuses you want, the fact is that your ideologues are in charge and all you have are excuses. As big a wrecker of the economy as Corbyn with theirs and your fantasy ideologies.

    It’s all because of net zero, yet the dollar is rising (and was the excuse for the slump). Yet, somehow, this ultimate cause of our predicament isn’t having much of an effect in the USA.

    The Conservatives: The party of zero personal responsibility.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Inept Government #245671
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Don’t worry everyone. These geniuses have identified the true cause of the pound crash:

    That’s right, the market reacted so briskly to the possibility of a Labour government coming in when we don’t have knowledge of the outcome or even the date of the election. We can’t predict the financial outcomes of Brexit, but we can definitely state the financial impacts of election outcomes for times unspecified.

    Their lack of personal responsibility is becoming impossible to satirise.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Geographical location #245663
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I am not having it that Shrewsbury, Birmingham or Hereford are northern! :-)

    in reply to: The Tory, Oops, I mean Labour Conference is Going Well #245662
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    God. Don’t you start with the claims that anything not Corbyn Labour is actually Tory. There is nothing Tory about singing the anthem and not being performatively socialist. It’s been that way since Attlee and before. It’s bad enough when Owen Jones and co groan on about it.

    To be fair, pretty much anyone could have beaten Corbyn and I thought that Boris hadn’t achieved Brexit, given that the narrative from some is that we need to ensure it’s done after predictably reneging on triumphs of what a fantastic deal it was.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Torquay. #245654
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Wasn’t Spire a Torquay fan before Scunny?

    in reply to: Geographical location #245651
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Well, it’s a good job Scunny is further north than mouth of the Humber, eh? ;-)

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Inept Government #245644
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Yes. Boris Johnson, Priti Patel, Michael Gove, Steve Baker, Jacob Rees-Mogg etc. Those well known campaigners for remain.

    in reply to: Southgate #245634
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Southgate insists on playing Maguire when it’s clear he’s out of form and confidence shot. It’s mad.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: What have you been listening to today? Again…. #245608
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Now I will have to call you JustLes as penance! :-)

    in reply to: What have you been listening to today? Again…. #245604
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    All this talk of triggering and cancelling because some air dislike for something is tedious.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Inept Government #245599
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Rees-Mogg?

    in reply to: This is who they stand for #245427
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Many Tory backbenchers didn’t seem happy with the plan yesterday. No doubt they’re all part of the neo-Marxists BPG keeps warning us about. It’s handy when anyone who disagrees with you isn’t someone behaving in good faith, but an evil conspirator.

    in reply to: This is who they stand for #245424
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    That didn’t seem to be your point; you specifically said it was the BBC’s headline, and was akin to the Guardian’s. Hence you weren’t saying they were wrong to highlight another headline, you thought it was their own.

    No, they were quoting a media source to highlight a media reaction. They have done the same with right wing rags in the past. The fact you think the BBC would prefer the Morning Star shows how deluded you are on this.

    in reply to: Longer queues at the Doctors #245419
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I am not sure about that. He is an authoritarian conservative, but I am not quite sure he’d be a fascist. It would go against his sensibilities as some archaic idyll of what a gentlemen should be.

    in reply to: Southgate #245417
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It doesn’t look good going into the World Cup, but can’t see the FA doing anything beforehand. There would be too much outrage after him getting us further than other coaches have. If we don’t do well, hopefully that will allow some critical analysis of his position. He’s a great man manager, but is tactically poor, as is evident when he has faced sides of equal or better quality.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: This is who they stand for #245414
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I note you don’t mention that the BBC used quotation marks, because they were quoting the Guardian, not because it was their own choice of headline. It was in a page talking about media reaction. Fuss over nothing from someone who want to demonise anything which isn’t remotely right wing, as is evident with your comments against anything which doesn’t see this as being some great news for the economy.

    Meanwhile, the pound plummets and adherents have nothing to back up their opinions. Just that anyone criticising must be some evil lefty. Such is the vacuum of their argument.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: This is who they stand for #245373
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Don’t tempt those who will say that the true poor wouldn’t be drinking whisky at all if times were tough, while they casually sip on their champagne.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Holly Willoughby, #245271
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    ….the “elites” are the neo- Marxists. The “old school” communists ( give it another try,we will do it better this time) are missing the aims of the new ideology,that will lead to misery and chaos – starting with the working classes!!

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Holly Willoughby, #245242
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    The same Sally Army which has sex abuse of minors in its past and allegations of unpaid labour. ;-) “One of the greats.”

    in reply to: Behind the goal. #245211
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    A protest without inconvenience is unlikely to achieve anything.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Dreams of Thunder #245030
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100
    in reply to: Dreams of Thunder #245023
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I am guessing there is a horse of Swann’s called Dreams of Thunder and Renee is relating it to the Iron. ;-)

    in reply to: Postponed #245014
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Or maybe Harry Flashman, Rugby school. :-)

    in reply to: Postponed #244978
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It’s telling of your morality if you don’t think animals should be treated with respect. It doesn’t exactly sell Christianity to me if you think being an animal means it’s acceptable to disrespect or abuse them.

    in reply to: Administration #244968
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I am not sure that he would have let that happen, but he was on the board when Broome was around, and that leaves a sour taste in my mouth, unless he was actually concerned about that.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Administration #244923
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Speaking of his bar, the recent reviews look great! X-)

    https://www.tripadvisor.co.uk/Restaurant_Review-g186332-d23630968-Reviews-Spyglass_Bar-Blackpool_Lancashire_England.html

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Terrible Tactics #244919
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    We have had several managers who think that the best way to win a game is to have the team defend, like it’s the Alamo, as soon as we take the lead. They never seem to learn as it continues to fail either.

    5 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Postponed #244856
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I think we all could detect the sarcasm. ;-)

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Slava Ukraini #244811
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    The latest news of the Ukrainian gains was the most read stories on BBC News, and that includes the Queen related news, yesterday for some time. I know this includes international views, but it shows interest still.

    I don’t think it will. The British public have always prided ourselves in standing up to a fascist threat in Nazi Germany. While, there isn’t an appetite to actively join the war in support of Ukraine, there is a sympathy there because of this, where Russia is seen as an expansionist aggressor against a sovereign neighbour, I think. Some may try that line, but I don’t think the public will turn against Ukraine because of it. It might be said the quickest way to end the conflict now is to continue support Ukraine to defeat Russia, especially after yesterday showed they are more than capable of pushing back.

    Polls from across Europe shows a willingness to support Ukraine despite costs. From Germany to France to Poland to Czech Republic and so on.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Slava Ukraini #244806
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    IA – The Russian stance is that it’s a managed withdrawal to the Donbass. Which is why they have abandoned all their equipment!

    It was bad in Syria when they tried to legitimise Russian propaganda for that campaign, including pouring doubt over chemical attacks. Unfortunately, that was easier to convince, due to the existence of bad elements in Syria besides Assad. It didn’t matter that the Russians and Assad were targeting civilians; they could play on anti-Muslim bigotry and associate victims as terrorists (which is ironic, given these people often cry about anti-Muslim bigotry back home and in the Israel-Palestine conflict, rightly or wrongly). They could label groups like the White Helmets as a terrorist front, with no evidence, because of this.

    However, they have overplayed their hand here. They have tried with the assertions that Ukraine is riddled with Nazis and far-right, but it hasn’t stuck. The public can see who the aggressor is, who is committing the atrocities, and claims of the Nazi nature of Ukraine look ridiculous when they act like any other nation defending its sovereignty against a foe which uses neo-Nazi mercenaries for their cause.

    1 user thanked author for this post.