Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Good chance to see how our current team stacks up against a team sitting where we would like to be next season.
Unless they have changed their style they will come to attack us so should be a decent game and should draw a healthy crowd.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Would have done better with Dot Cotton.
First ever trophy game for me as well Awaywego.
Even though ticket prices much reduced the fact that season ticket holders have to pay means even a 1500 crowd is a bit of a welcome earner.
A win and a decent couple of home draws in later rounds would be helpful for the new owners.
If reports on social media are correct it might be a little premature to go full party mode on this.
It’s claimed the club will own 25% of land (ground?) and an as yet unknown 3rd party will own 75% (car parks and training pitch).
Might be a load of BS of course but after our last 2 owners I’m holding the champagne for now.
1 user thanked author for this post.
In our remaining away games apart from Spennymoor and South Sheilds there is a fair chance that all the other teams will have seen Curzon, Buxton and Kings Lynn demonstrate the way to beat us and set up accordingly.
Even Spennymoor and South Shields might do the same given the spanking they both received when setting up to take us on at GP.
Our midfield 3 are all very good footballers in their very different ways but none are “scrappers”. Scales has a bit of an edge but is more likely to win a card than a tackle.
In the away games we have lost and drawn they have been against (at least) a midfield 4 that have tackled and harried and generally stopped our 3 from playing. This stops the quality service the 2 wide forwards rely on to create openings. They become ineffective because neither Law or Smith are guys that fight for and win possession from poor quality passes or long ball clearances.
This in turn leaves the central striker fighting a loan battle which is not Whitehall or Elliott’s forte.
For me we need to add a defensive sitter in midfield to even up the numbers. Shrimpton likes a tackle and a scrap so would be my choice. Sacrifice Smith and Law and play Elliott up front with Whitehall.
Denton and Barrows should be looking to provide width and crosses for the front two and pushing opposition full backs or wing backs to defend. The centre backs are usually dealing with a single striker so should be fine particularly wit a sitting midfielder in front of them.
Less pretty and pure but more pragmatic at this level for away games against the “middling” teams.
A bit too old school 4-4-2 for Jimmy?
Call it an inverted diamond to jazz it up a bit and get on with beating some of these poorer sides away from home. We can probably risk the home set up against the Darlington and Bishop Stortford end of things but we are not going to blow away half decent NLN teams playing their “Cup finals”.I would have given a red for the foul on Scales late on but otherwise agree she got most things right.
Both teams played the game in the right way so not a difficult match to referee.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Thought the ref was one of the better ones we have had this season albeit a low bar.
Sign of a championship winning side that wins a game comfortably without playing well.
Poetry in motion apparently Bill.
Respect to the 18 or so.
6 hour round trip by road or 9 hours or so by train.
Giving up most of your Saturday and parting with a decent wadge of cash when you have little hope of much joy. Showing the love for their club.
1 user thanked author for this post.
If the various professional leagues and the FA are incapable of doing a competent fit and proper persons test then I don’t suppose players can expect their agents to do it properly.
Perhaps a goalkeeper?
Hereford are saying Pugh will not play against us in December.
Pitch inspection Friday 17:00 so the game is obviously in some doubt.
1 user thanked author for this post.
National League TV don’t do Saturday livestreams for NLN or NLS.
For those leagues they only do midweek fixtures and Saturday fixtures on international break weekends.
If and when we get back to the National League Saturday games are then available to “international” customers. This is a rule instigated by the Premier League but can be worked around using a VPN set to a foreign country. Used to do this in our EFL days and last season in the National League.
1 user thanked author for this post.
It is not the end of the world but it’s not much fun to watch after spending 2 hours plus each way and a fair wadge of cash to attend.
Seen all league away matches so far this season and it hasn’t been enough to inspire me to travel to Blyth and Banbury for the next two.
Hopefully I am the jinx and we actually play a bit of football in those 2 games.
I’ll probably still suffer the RH commentary Saturday and the livestream on Tuesday.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Yes but he is from Middlesbrough so Sunderland probably looks good to him.
1 user thanked author for this post.
A quick Internet trawl suggests while they have a training/community 3g pitch the stadium pitch is grass.
Yes, but only because he’s not being used correctly. He’s neither a wide player nor a lone striker.
Agree Cass but with Jimmy claiming he will never play old fashioned 4-4-2 and the team demonstrating at Chester they can’t play 5-3-2 there is little prospect him being used as one of a pair of strikers.
As central striker of a front 3 he is probably behind Whitehall and Bennett in the queue.
Nothing against the rest of the squad by the way. I would keep the lot if we can get 5000 through the gate every home match.
It’s just I think the ones listed could play in a decent L2 side tomorrow.
As Chris Plummer said in his post match interview other clubs are going to want the players we most want to keep.
We could all come up with 3 or 4 squad players that we could probably afford to lose but there won’t be an orderly queue of suitors. Particularly if they are on deals that are generous relative to their ability.
Probably better to decide the players we would not consider allowing to leave.
For me that list would be:
Fitzsimons
Kouogan
Denton
Evans
Clunan
Butterfield
ScalesOf course we didn’t know then that Darlington are a poor side even by National League North standards. They have only 1 win from 12 games.
Even Scarborough are no great shakes sitting in lower mid table.
We have yet to put in a consistently good performance against a genuine top 7 team.
Tomorrow would be a great time to start. Suspect we might see Clunan and Law pushed back in a bit earlier than ideal.
1 user thanked author for this post.
We have 3 central strikers in Whitehall, Bennett and Elliott.
We have 2 right sided forwards in Wilson and Sembie-Ferris.
We have 2 left sided forwards in Law and Roberts. Dean was also playing Beestin there before his injury.
I really think 10 forwards is enough bordering on overkill.
Our real problem is that only one of our 10 or so midfielders seems capable of creating chances.
Apart from spells against Darlington and Scarborough we have never put teams under sustained pressure. Given our advantages over most teams in this division are our fitness levels and a higher skill level why are we not playing a high tempo passing game at all times?
Whenever we do it we look like scoring goals. A bit more Klopp and a lot less Guardiola please Jimmy.
2 users thanked author for this post.
I have never been a fan of 5-3-2 at the lower levels of professional football and I think I am correct in saying most of our managers over the last 10 years have tried it and failed to make it work.
It is only a valid defensive tactic if you are trying to snatch a point (or 3 if you are very lucky) when you are playing a vastly superior football team. Should not be relevant to us this season then.
It is only a valid attacking tactic if you have full backs that can go past defenders and cross the ball properly and at least one centre back with the ability to step into the base of midfield and pass the ball forwards with decent accuracy. We have none of these things so should not be relevant to us. It allows us to get more sideways and backwards passes whilst we wait for the opposition to get into their defensive shape before we knock it long anyway.
That said the formation worked OK for 30 minutes yesterday. But for a incorrect offside flag we would have been 1 up and with a bit of luck it could have been 2. Chester were no threat and a high press was causing them to go long which was playing into our hands.
Once we gifted them a goal their building frustrations lifted, our heads dropped and we pretty much didn’t lay a glove on them after that. I didn’t see anyone on the pitch or the touchline doing anything to change how badly the team played for the last hour. If anything was said at half time by way of motivation or tactical change then nothing was apparent on the pitch.
On a related note could someone ask Whitehall to occasionally win the ball and do something with it instead of constantly sitting on his arse and claiming he has been fouled. Officials and opposition coaches are well aware this is his default tactic so it rarely results in a free kick even when he is fouled.
Nobody going to make it by train according to Trainline app.
Anyone on their way but stuck at Doncaster Station let me know I have 2 or 3 spaces in the car.
I’ll keep an eye out for him Awaywego.
Make sure he behaves better than his Grandad.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Been in it at both grounds then TW.
Perhaps the mods think Peter is so childish that he won’t sell the club their ground back if he gets criticised on here.
Surely not.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Gone with 2-1 to the Iron.
Looking forward to watching us play in Chester 40 years since my last football visit.
Different ground and different club that day but we did win promotion despite having an arsehole for a manager at the time.
I think monkeys may also feel slighted by the inference in the thread title Deery.
It’s my understanding that the Trust would have to match the highest offer which is not necessarily the sellers asking price.
Also if the Trust were to purchase 51% and SUFC the remainder that would serve the purpose of protecting the asset from future shenanigans.
-
AuthorPosts