Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ticket price hike? #309252
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    No problem with the price rise. I think they should have put up season ticket prices as well.

    However, a double digit percentage rise in prices without even announcing it is beyond stupidity.

    The words speak of the importance of the fanbase. The actions scream the opposite.

    in reply to: Captain #309247
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Roberts moans non stop at his team mates throughout the game.

    This probably means they have all learnt to ignore what he says.

    in reply to: Fanbase tickets #308860
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    They can get a card same as usual. Has to be a new one – can’t have the existing one updated like last season.

    That’s because of change of National League sponsor – nothing to do with fanbase.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: VOICE OF THE FANS #308858
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Was there not something on the OWS inviting fans to apply about 6 months ago?

    It did not specify any selection criteria if memory serves.

    The club can claim the opportunity was there for everyone and I’m sure they will as soon as the criticism starts.

    in reply to: Squad of 23? Mentioned By AB. #308559
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    That same guy that picked Fitzsimons, Clunan and Whitehall every single game they were fit for.

    Even though they were sh1te apparently.

    in reply to: Squad of 23? Mentioned By AB. #308326
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    We have many OK players and not many really good ones.

    Pick any 11 and play them against the other 11 and it would be tight.

    Whichever 11 gets Roberts would likely win it.

    in reply to: Squad of 23? Mentioned By AB. #308190
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Rosie missing as well as Eze.

    I don’t think Butlers 23 included Barrows.

    in reply to: A Vapid Pre-Season #308186
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Suspect the 3 still involved yesterday had a gentleman’s agreement to do a complete full time preseason.

    I am sure they will have known for 2 or 3 weeks they weren’t getting a contract here. They may even have deals with part time sides already but the preseason work will help them get off to a good start wherever they end up.

    Meanwhile it has allowed Butler to have 11 a side practice sessions.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Triallists #307955
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    No matter how many centre backs you start with Mick.

    Campbell did make one very good save to be fair.

    in reply to: Triallists #307951
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Assuming it was practice for 5 at the back at Tamworth next week but meant we just about controlled the first half without creating anything that didn’t involve Roberts being Roberts.

    You were right about Rose Lesgeo – seems he went back to Peterborough as a handy looking right back but has returned as a centre back of 3 fighting over 1 forward.

    Second half of Butler substitution bingo meant we looked even less organised or interested.

    Pretty poor Worksop side (according to their supporters I was chatting to) had the better second half chances and probably should have nicked it.

    in reply to: OB1 The Plot thickens! #307918
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Nobody should be jumping to conclusions but meanwhile these are the one’s I’ve jumped to.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    fans64 64
    in reply to: What a cracker #307894
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    There was talk he could cover CB when he was here on loan.

    Probably played there at youth level but looks like he would need to fill out a bit to cope there in the National League. Not afraid to get stuck in though so possibly for an emergency game or two.

    Horton looks more physically suited to back up CB role.

    Still love to see an experienced but mobile holding midfielder with just a touch of spite to help us through the tough away games.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: What a cracker #307881
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    What’s he like in goal?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: SUFC Board vs Iron Trust #307848
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Since when was the club worth more than £10m?

    in reply to: SUFC Board vs Iron Trust #307844
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Difficult to purchase a significant amount of shares if you only charge £10 for a lifetime membership.

    Hence the recent scheme to raise £100,000 and to earn at least a seat at the boardroom table if not the ability to influence decisions.

    If the club agreed the scheme I would have handed the trust £1,000 towards it’s target. My motive is to help protect the club against toxic owners and hair brained ownership changes.

    No point in me buying £1,000 worth on my own as that achieves nothing in terms of supporter oversight on the custodians of the club.

    If there are enough supporters thinking similarly then the trust could easily meet the £100,000 target and probably beat it.

    Some or all of the current owners obviously do not want oversight from representatives of the supporters. Makes me wonder why and concerns me for the future.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    admin SST
    in reply to: SUFC Board vs Iron Trust #307770
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Simple translation of Michelle’s statement:
    It is fine to hand us yor cash in dribs and drabs with no influence or input.

    We don’t want substantial sums of money from folks that might want to interfere next time we have a stupid idea.

    in reply to: Fanbase #307769
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Of all of the problems the Iron have experienced on and off the field in recent years getting a home match ticket has always been easy and successful.

    Buying tickets for away games in the National League has been a right pain up until and including the Tamworth tickets I waited 40 minutes in a virtual queue to buy.

    I have had to register with at least 6 micky mouse ticketing outfits that I have no interest in being a member of and usually costing me an extra quid or two per ticket for the privilege.

    That is better understanding and connecting with your fans apparently. Absolute marketing bollox which seems to be the only language our CEO speaks.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: SUFC Board vs Iron Trust #307745
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    The gambler and the fraudster have thankfully left the building.

    Dumb and dumber are still there sadly.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: SUFC Board vs Iron Trust #307737
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Surprisingly they have not found a club daft or desperate enough to do a deal with them yet.

    People that want to play Championship Manager for real but with other people’s money.

    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    5 at the back and 7 forwards on the bench.

    Bonkers.

    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Assuming the back four Bill and I suggested the only defenders we could have on the bench would be Horton and Boyce.

    I think we only would have one out and out midfielder on the bench (either Scales or Rowley if the other starts). Assume the other goalkeeper gets a spot then 3 vacancies for forwards.

    Any 3 from Beck, Carlton, Chadwick, Dawson and either Eze or Howe assuming the other of those 2 start.

    The squad is unbalanced for me with only 2 weeks to go until we kick off for real.

    Defensive midfielder and a full back that can pull a shift at centre back are the minimum needed.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Forgot to add the jury is still out on Campbell and Starbuck but currently the best we have in their positions.

    I would drop Beestin or Scales for a proper defensive midfielder in away games (if we had one).

    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Only seen the Frod and Cleggy games.

    Campbell
    Starbuck Evans Frenchy Jean Denton
    Scales Ewing
    Roberts Beestin Eze
    Whitehall

    in reply to: SUFC Board vs Iron Trust #307601
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    I have cancelled my £10 monthly draw payment which was effectively a charity donation as I gave back the one prize I won and would have done the same with any further prizes.

    If the club only wants my money if it’s charity but not as a Trust member shareholder then they can do one. They have my season ticket money but they will get nothing else from me.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: New Kit Latest #307415
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    That’s what I was trying to say in my earlier post Deery but you have put it much more clearly.

    in reply to: New Kit Latest #307383
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Might just be my eyesight but the E hexagon looks closer to the chain line in the leaked pic than the M hexagon.

    Maybe the logo is designed like that.

    in reply to: Remission #307341
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Totally agree with Rene’s original post.

    However this is a football forum so opinions on footballers ability to play football at the general level of the team and the league we are in is surely one of the main reasons the forum exists.

    Or is it just to bitch about one another and people that post stuff on Facebook and Twitter?

    So long as it does not sink to the level of abuse I don’t see a problem. Personally hope one and preferably both of our current goalkeepers prove me wrong in thinking one is not ready and the other never will be ready for full time mens football.

    The goalkeeper situation is not the end of the world because if neither do the business it is fairly easy to sign a competent young keeper on loan should it prove necessary.

    I am much more concerned at not recruiting players suited to 5 at the back and then starting the last 2 friendlies with that formation.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Starting X1 #307265
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Only saw Frenchie Jean in the first half against Frod. Didn’t appear against Cleggy which was the only other friendly I’ve seen.

    He looked more comfortable on the ball than Maxi and definitely has more pace. Given that Maxi was the quickest of our CB’s last season that’s a good sign. Cannot comment on his defensive capability as Frod’s only moment of real danger in the first half was a right wing set piece that our whole defence and No.1 goalkeeper all chose to ignore.

    Boyce is steady and consistent but the better attacking players in the National League will be too quick for him.

    in reply to: Reprising Five at the back. #307207
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    I would rather he could cover as goalkeeper.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Gainsborough Trinity friendly. #307175
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 51

    Well done Maison. Half a clean sheet with a back 5 playing a side 2 levels down.

    Welcome back Rory.