Forum Replies Created
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
Looking bad but there were positives:
Grant and Feeney should both now be match fit. Will make a big difference.
Well played, Lewis!
Sinclair a full notch above Green and Hippo.
Good, innit?
Now need one CB and two forwards on Monday.
Real forwards playing in forward positions would be an unusual feature not seen for a number of seasons.1 user thanked author for this post.
He was better then than now.
I’ve said it before – his passing skills are special.
His problem is that, like so many, he’s not capable of raising his game above the levels of those surrounding him.
Playing off a Bish – he’d have the requisite skills to make a big difference.
He needs games to toughen up. (Not whilst we face relegation, though.)1 user thanked author for this post.
Wood was puzzling.
Had Cox ruined him?
There was a great deal of good stuff from the lad – though two or three possessions were lost in important positions.
There is something to build on. He actually made more difference to the game than Hackney tends to.1 user thanked author for this post.
There are certainly some Covid issues.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Perry is a long way from match fit.
A poor first game back and another rising to the dizzy heights of mediocrity, tonight.
He’s better than this.1 user thanked author for this post.
Harsh.
A lot of inexperience and callow youth, yes, but most of their problems are that they have zero leadership on the pitch.It’s like a young person arriving to begin an apprenticeship in a cabinet maker’s workshop who is told to ‘Get on with it. Make a cabinet. And be sure it’s a good one.’
7 users thanked author for this post.
A personal friend of one of my sons is a top libel lawyer and consequently, I do know a little more about the subject than the average dude in the street.
I have seen a number of personal attacks on here which would surely be warranting a libel suit.
I’m assuming that none has been issued.I am wondering why this is the case. Is the evidence stacked so highly against the chairman that he dare not take that route? – I have no idea.
Thoughts?
3 users thanked author for this post.
Making the books balance as the only objective is bonkers.
4 users thanked author for this post.
Only thing is – the 70s now really do look so much better than what we currently have.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Max wrote well.
I was also really impressed with what Keith Hill wrote on the Iron website.
1) There are people you mistrust.
2) There are those whom you hope you can trust.
3) There’s the the ones where you want to give them a chance.
4) There are some you trust – but with a few reservations.
5) There are people you are prepared to trust.For me:
Keith Hill is a 5.
Neil Cox arrived as 3 and ended as a 1.
The Chairman arrived as a combined 2 and 3 and is now a 1.4 users thanked author for this post.
CB, real leader in CM + two forwards.
ALL must be experienced and fit.2 users thanked author for this post.
We are a matter of days from self-destruction.
I wonder if NOW might be an appropriate time?It is the job of club boards to manage budgets efficiently – and that does not mean to spend extravagantly and then slam on the brakes so hard that the tyres don’t just burn away but all the wheels come off too.
This is NOT the fault of the fans!
10 users thanked author for this post.
