Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Swanns Alleged 20 Million Addiction #251090
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    64 – ALLEGED covers myself against a disgraceful SUFC wrecker. He would take anyone to court as nothing is ever his fault. He thinks he’s blameless for all of his wrong doings.

    If you think that saying “alleged” will keep you out of the firing line, you are wrong.

    So, if you are going to make any further allegations, tread carefully.

    in reply to: I smell a swan sized Rat #250751
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    “I stand corrected”

    You are very good at ‘copy and paste’ Burney. Why not just stop making things up?

    in reply to: Turnbull Interview #250413
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    You can speculate all you like,I’m not

    “My head says the deal is dead.”

    Yes you are.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Manager. #249776
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Surely Adkins, Bara or Lawsy wouldn’t want to see us drop again.

    Com’on gents FOC for second half of the season?

    So you expect someone to take on a shit role for 6 months, for free? It certainly wouldn’t enhance their CV and they would likely get abuse too, especially if there wasn’t a major turnaround. Unlikely (and I wouldn’t blame them).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: An Ounce of Decency #249762
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    We don’t know anything because we have never been told anything! The fans have been treated like the proverbial mushroom since he walked through the door! So the fans cannot be blamed for jumping to conclusions!

    Jumping to conclusions is wrong, especially some of the ridiculous ones that have cropped up – and some people now look really stupid.

    What is worse is where people just make stuff up, and that has happened a lot. Totally unnecessary.

    in reply to: An Ounce of Decency #249694
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    We don’t know everything, but I don’t think faffing around with some property developer for ages because he wouldn’t sell to a local consortium is the sign of someone who was acting just in the interests of the club. I think we can have some assumptions as to why it took so long for him to prioritise Elliott and Sharp.

    If you were selling you’d look for the best deal you could get. Rightly so.

    We don’t know if the local bid was ready when the London consortium made theirs. Swann cannot be blamed for selling the club!! We’ve been on at him for the last 3 years to do so.

    in reply to: An Ounce of Decency #249641
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    The reality is that we know nothing!!

    Is Swann moving the goalposts? If so, please explain NLI because we don’t know.

    Sp many people on here are making things up or “assuming” things. Let’s have some facts to back up what you are saying.

    I’m not saying Swann is playing ball, but just making up stuff is not acceptable.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: England – Same as it ever was #249533
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    9 goals in the group stage, similar to the last world cup. More goals than England scored at the 2014 (2), 2010 (3), 2006 (6) and 2002 (6) world cups put together. But, sure, Southgate’s a negative, defensive manager who plays with the handbrake on.

    The total goals scored in the list ypu provided is 17. I’m sure that’s more than the 9 they have scored so far!!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Daggers #248846
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Wasn’t it 21 or 22 draws that season?

    We were ahead in something like 15 of them afrer the 87th minute.

    The worst promotion ever.

    in reply to: Daggers #248839
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Was the 3-3 game at Dagenham when it was torrential rain towards the end of the match ?

    Yes. We were 3-1 up when the players were taken off because of the weather.

    They came back out about 15 mins later and the pitch was absolutely soaked.

    There was only circa 20 mins keft but we managed to hold on for a point!!

    A strange game all round.

    in reply to: NFI #248548
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    I fear Swann is waiting for the gates to drop and then he may come and put us into administration and put the blame on the fans for not coming through the turnstiles. Then he may liquidate the club and sell the land to get back the money which HE has squandered. Lie after lie after lie. He says he wants to sell the club so why does he apparently keep moving the goalposts when we have two consortiums which appear very willing to buy our Club. If he doesn’t sell now it proves he is willing to let our club go under for his own benefit in my opinion. What sort of a person does it take who would wreck a football club who have been a league club for over seventy years, with a decent fan base of dedicated supporters, as proved by the current attendances. Even though the football is dire fans are still attending. I ask again what sort of a person would wreck a club, sign over the assets and land to their own company and then walk away with the proceeds from such assets????????? If this were to happen what sort of a person would do this????????? Time will tell but to the SWANNS please allow new owners to buy our club and get gone because it is you who is costing our club the longer you stay as owners. I believe that if the SWANNS were to leave there would be a return of another 1000 supporters through the turnstiles immediately. This is my opinion and may not happen, we can only hope.

    Do you actually know if these 2 consortiums are actually willing to buy the club? Also, are they willing to make an acceptable bid?

    Swann has been a disaster for our club, but it is unfair that all the assumptions that you make are all negative against him. You may be correct, but I believe that he will fulfil some of the things he has told us he will. None of us know what will happen – but let’s hope it happens soon.

    in reply to: Daniel and Whitehouse #248547
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Not sure if these two are injured? But surely if they are fit they should be at least on the bench for experience at least, if their fit surely it can only be financial why they are not playing.

    today we desperately needed to play at a high pace but we slipped into Maidstones trap played at their pace and got punished, the players need to be shown how hard it is for the supporters to keep giving their hard earned money and getting nothing back.

    Today is the lowest point I have ever felt! In the 47 years of supporting the Iron, we had poor teams in the mid 70s but you want to the games knowing they would put 110% into the game even if they were outclassed.

    I Was reasonably happy on Wednesday after the game as Wrexham were a class above us and we at least had a go, today against a very poor team we were made to look even poorer and I really do fear the the club as a whole.

    Starting to believe Mr and Mrs Swann really do want us to go into administration as punishment for the mistakes they have made in throwing money into the pit and not getting to the promised land.

    Three words to the both of them “SELL US NOW” please,please,please sell us before it’s to late and give the new people a fighting chance, But unfortunately I can’t see it happening as they have made their mind up to bankrupt the club.

    Can you please explain to me how the Swanns will benefit more by bankrupting the Club than by selling it?

    in reply to: Another Swann milestone #248200
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Cash flow problem regarding purchasing new stock? Suppliers not been paid? All speculation but it’s a rightful concern, before anybody starts complaining.

    It’s only a rightful comcern if it is the truth. At this moment in time it is only conjecture.

    in reply to: What is the Truth #248044
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    To say that Swann made up the potential sale to get more fans at matches as we need the money is beyond ridiculous.

    The amount of money needed to keep the Club afloat would require at least an additional 3,000 fans every month based on what we are reputed to be losing and require. It is never going to happen.

    As I’ve stated before, Swann is a disaster fornus and needs to sell up asap. However, the repeated requests for him to make a statement are only slightly less boring than all those people who call him a liar when he does.

    We don’t know if he is finalising a sale or not, and none of us know what price he is asking for. Sadly, we just have to wait and see.

    I would like posters to think before they post as the site has become noticeably less busy as fabrication of all things SUFC has increased. As I was told many years ago, if you have nothing sensible to say don’t say anyyhing.

    in reply to: Video #247940
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Too little & probably too late.

    We do not have enough support to take the Club on. The idea that the Club belongs to the fans is bollocks.

    It used to belong to Wharton, and now it belongs to Swann. Hopefully there is someone out there with enough money, and enough conviction, to take it on and give the fans what they want.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: What is the Truth #247882
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    So the deal that was never on in the first place is off. Swann does not intend to sell – he just needed the next excuse.

    Can you explain what evidence you have to tell us that the deal is off? (That is, the deal that you say was never on in the first place!!).

    PS how do you know that there was no deal on the first place?

    I want Swan gone as much as the next man, but all this BS is getting somewhat monotonous.

    in reply to: Barnet #247841
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Just another thing to thank Swann for. Everything around the club is just so toxic, disharmony everywhere. He has created that culture and environment alongside everything else. A true disgrace of a man.

    F row crew, and the 2 people who liked the post, should be ashamed.

    Swann has a lot to answer for, but blaming him for the (so called) fans behaviour last night is ridiculous.

    As recent posts show, this has been going on periodically for many a year.

    These people should be identified and banned. It is totally unacceptable.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: 4 FROM 9 #246464
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Come on Alky, be positive for once.

    in reply to: That there takeover? #246401
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    OK we have all comments but at the end of the day Swann not interested in selling

    Based on no knowledge whatsoever…..

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: That there takeover? #246338
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    It is stated that he promised this that and the other, that his sole intention was to develop the land on which the ground stands, that he doesn’t care about the club or the fans. All wrong.

    So tell us one thing that he has promised that has actually happened.

    He said he was going to do a lot of things, the vast majority of which he has failed to deliver. How many actual promises he made, I don’t know. I can’t think of any.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: That there takeover? #246336
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Broadly agree with what III is saying but not sure there’s evidence he actually does care about the fans. Certainly not the last few years.

    Sorry Deerey, my fault for not making it clear – he doesn’t care for the fans, which is obvious, but he does care what the fans think of him.

    A man who is out of his depth and has no idea how to stabilise things. Hopefully someone will come along soon and replace him.

    in reply to: That there takeover? #246327
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Sorry Sanfran, but this is where the paranoia comes in.

    Whilst Swann has been an absolute disaster for the club, he most certainly didn’t plan it.

    It is stated that he promised this that and the other, that his sole intention was to develop the land on which the ground stands, that he doesn’t care about the club or the fans. All wrong.

    His character is such that he wants to be loved, he wants to be our saviour, he wants to be remembered. Sadly, he has been so incompetent that he has failed in all areas.

    He wanted the new ground, to play in the Championship and be the big “I am”. I, for one, wish he had been successful (but I still wouldn’t have liked him).

    Hopefully someone with the same intentions, but far more capable, takes us on soon.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: That there takeover? #246314
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    The reality is that none of us know what is happening.

    Even with nda’s/conf agreements, there would be nothing to stop either party making a basic statement like Swann has. No detail, nothing controversial, just a general statement.

    What I find hard to take is all these poster who moan when Swann doesn’t say anything yet shout “liar” as soon as he opens his mouth. It is getting tedious.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Yesterdays game #246241
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Still on course for another relegation, though.

    Not if you base our future performance on the form of the last 5 games we’re not.

    We can all make statistics say what we want.

    If we do perform well and survive will it make you happy?

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: BBC – team formation #245896
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Sky still have Keith Hill listed as our manager!! Thank God he isn’t.

    in reply to: Dorking #245484
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Well, the ref has just blown for half time, in what must have been the worst performance by a Scunny team in many a year, they have been overrun by a part time team who are 0-2 in front, but according to the commentators, it should be 5 or 6 to the part timers, Scunny have reached an all time low, and have not really had a shot on the Dorking goal, the players have just gone off to a really good ringing of boo’s from the die hards that still are prepared to bother to turn up to watch thus pathetic shower.

    IT IS PROBABLY A GOOD TIME TO LIQUIDATE THINGS AND PULL THE PLUG ON THINGS!!!!

    How bloody low can our once great little club sink. only this week fans were yelling how things are much better, that was after a couple of draws which were following six straight losses, so just another round of boo’s from the fans, and another round in 45 minutes time, then back home sick as parrots and get ready for thew next home game, and the two away matches that are coming up for about 200 usual nut heads.

    Having your own opinions is fine, and choosing not to attend is your right. However, calling loyal supporters “nut heads” is out of order – and I’m sure that they enjoyed the result today more than you did.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Do teams stay up in NL with 35 points? #245378
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Do teams stay up when a number of posters throw random stats at us on a regular basis?

    in reply to: Administration #245111
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    Reminder…. A company must have stopped trading for 3 months before it can be struck off the companies register. Source government web page. “Striking your company off the companies register”

    He can close the company down whenever he wants to. If he doesn’t oee anyone any money the the company will cease to exist after 3 months.

    Peopme can put forward reasons why it shouldn’t be closed, but they need to be justified – and if it isn’t financially related, then it will be unlikely to pass muster.

    in reply to: Ivan Toney #245017
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    If he didn’t want to be here why did he come twice.

    I said he wasn’t happy here – and he wasn’t. He came to get game time and put himself in the shop window. It worked.

    in reply to: Ivan Toney #245011
    IronIronIronIronIronIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 24, 2013
    Topics: 9

    He had a major attitude problem when he was with us. He wasn’t happy being here and thought he was too good for us.

    He is a cracking player now though.