Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Iron hour/iron army #273625
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    ‘I prefer not to speak about this. if I speak…’

    in reply to: “I have a dream” #273609
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186
    in reply to: Keep it civil #273590
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    I’m pretty sure the thread title is ‘Keep it Civil?

    in reply to: People taking notice #273570
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    All good publicity. Glad it wasn’t me quoted in that rag though. MKI quoted though…

    in reply to: Keep it civil #273552
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    ‘Re: the Fishy comments. Perhaps posters should just provide links, not cut and paste text.’

    We deleted posts containing links to the ‘dossier’ on the Fishy when a poster, again, unwittingly pasted it on here when it first appeared on there back in March / April. We caught that very early too as we’d spotted it on there. If anyone see’s anything contentious on The Fishy in future, I’m sure posters are capable of finding it themselves.

    in reply to: Official social media shut? #273538
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Maybe for the best while they take stock of things?

    in reply to: Keep it civil #273532
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    I was going to clarify the mention of his daughter last night but ran out of time. Siderite is correct as he and I have stated before. A Bru poster unwittingly copied and pasted a post from The Fishy that contained the offending content. The post was spotted within half an hour and deleted. How do I know for sure? I deleted it after consulting Matt. Therefore to say this forum allows that sort of abuse on here is simply not true. We got rid of it as soon as we could. I haven’t seen any other reference to his daughter on here and watch closely. If I’d have seen anything else like that it would have been screenshot before deleting. Thanks

    in reply to: Another new low #273513
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    in reply to: Social media #273453
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Given who threw it, I’d wager, no

    in reply to: Another new low #273452
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Pre-Jan 2023: omnishabmbles. Jan 23 – present: omnidisgrace.

    in reply to: Another new low #273438
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    It’s not a spoof. Matt Ellis posted a screenshot of a reply to his banning order question that was answered by James saying it was the owners decision. At least 3 have been emailed, maybe more.

    in reply to: Who s banned next? #273419
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    This is part of the reason for the effort to reveal names IMO.

    in reply to: Another new low #273417
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    No reason given?? What sort of club is this nowadays?

    in reply to: Expunged #273415
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Well said NLI.

    in reply to: Another new low #273414
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Shocking. I doubt this is the lowest depth to go though. Unbelievable, but par for the course.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Peter Swanns Statement #273358
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    There was one person to blame for where we were last year. Now there are two.

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Uptown Top Panicking #273357
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Someone may have taken the piss out of his Stone Island top and he’s changed his mind?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Gainsborough groundshare #273317
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Yes, he’s just promised to do similar to others in the future. Nice. What a guy.

    in reply to: Social media #273315
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    One of the posts seems to have been removed now. There are a few things stated in it that just aren’t credible IMO. However, I’m bored of getting annoyed and wasting time and energy thinking about what either he or his sidekick come out with. Better things to do than waste more time on them

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Social media #273306
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Ffs. Not another one!

    in reply to: Gainsborough groundshare #273273
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Hmm, bluffing doesn’t equal negotiating tactic IMO. Playing Poker hasn’t worked so far has it?

    in reply to: Gainsborough groundshare #273250
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Agree it makes no sense but little does about the club right now

    in reply to: Keith Waters #273243
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    I thought that was some bloke round the back of Tiffs?

    in reply to: Rob Dancer SUFC Facebook page #273214
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Lol

    in reply to: Rob Dancer SUFC Facebook page #273209
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    and if you haven’t seen his Rolls Royce that must have cost a fortune.

    Rolls eyes.

    I was in the casino last night.
    Rolling dice in order to strike it lucky and save the club.
    Then, my alarm clock woke me up.
    Well, actually; the roosters in the next field.

    They threw me out of the club
    The club I built with my own two hands
    They threw me to the streets
    Into the streets where all the gangs hang

    in reply to: Yet another…’what have you been listening today?’ Thread #273181
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Been listening to this and watching the video a bit recently. My mate’s son (chubaby). Very talented, idiosyncratic. Mad artist, like his old man. The tale of Stuco the Gun Dog

    in reply to: The Cult of WHAM #273168
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Thought he meant Rene: more names than ‘dear David’. Not a messiah either but occasionlly a very naughty boy! Worthy of 4 statues.

    in reply to: Ian not so Sharp #273166
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Not like you to double down mate. Dunno, how much has he paid in? Not to be confused with ‘how much he says he’s paid in’.

    in reply to: Why did he take over SUFC #273153
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Pele’s theory

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Statement #273138
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Online
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    ‘I do not believe there has ever been the intention for a new stadium.’

    What? Not even after seeing those leoCAD images?

    1 user thanked author for this post.