Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 12, 2025 at 11:49 am in reply to: Butler interview post-Curzon Ashton (and in recent weeks) #298848
I guess it’s certainly more hard for a less seasoned pro to sideline a certain subjective bias when all around you it’s getting to fever pitch .Even the ground was becoming a bit of a bear pit and the press box is very exposed
It did seem to almost reach fever pitch, for a while – in the stadium, on socials.
until we get a proper arse kicker in midfield to win tackles and second balls we will continue to look vulnerable to the likes of Curzon.
Also read: Every thread about Clunan
February 12, 2025 at 11:43 am in reply to: Butler interview post-Curzon Ashton (and in recent weeks) #298845I think he was caught up in the general hurt and anger around the way things were going, and ‘got it wrong’.
So did Butler, by the way. But, as discussed further back up this thread, they both seem to have done some personal development work and turned it around. Fair play to them both.
February 12, 2025 at 11:40 am in reply to: Butler interview post-Curzon Ashton (and in recent weeks) #298843I think he wanted to make a mark and missed it.I do believe you can build trust and then be allowed more rope so to speak
I have to respectfully disagree with you there. I don’t think he was out for himself, looking for some Hard-Hitting Sports Journalism Prize. It wasn’t cynical. I think he was caught up in the general hurt and anger around the way things were going, and ‘got it wrong’.
February 12, 2025 at 11:24 am in reply to: Butler interview post-Curzon Ashton (and in recent weeks) #298839I personally think Olly Turner had to change,when he 1st arrived he got my back and Im someone who thinks Humberside reporters have been a bit too meek up until Mike White.Perhaps behind the scenes, as local press should,they have worked on a better relationship?.Fans want blood when we lose,it’s up to our local cal press to temper that while still offering an honest appraisal.Its not their job to “call out” anyone Especially as performance is so massively subjective
Ollie is a highly competent commentator and really good football reporter. But very occasionally in the past he’s worded post-match questions in a way that definitely (despite his tone of voice and delivery) would come across as confrontational or even aggressive to an already beleaguered manager. I think Ollie genuinely cares about the club like a fan does, and so I put it down to personal enthusiasm and professional clumsiness.
Personally, I’d rather tolerate that occasional misstep than the seemingly endless backslapping bore, wafer-thin ‘we’re all mates aren’t we’ shite we used to get. BBC Radio Humberside coverage of SUFC, streamlined as it is, is much better now than it has ever been imho.
February 12, 2025 at 10:50 am in reply to: Butler interview post-Curzon Ashton (and in recent weeks) #298835Maybe. May equally have had a word with himself. It was and is heartening to hear them getting on splendidly so soon after said episode.
Yeah, I thought that too. Just in general Butler seems to be someone who embraces life and wants to improve himself. So all credit to him if he did sit down and think about his part in his situation and “have a word with himself”. He does look to have turned it around in a very positive way and not many in football seem capable of that introspection and action.
1 user thanked author for this post.
February 12, 2025 at 10:39 am in reply to: Butler interview post-Curzon Ashton (and in recent weeks) #298833For me the big turning point was when he began to learn. He had success with his preferred system initially and seemed determined to stick with it when it stopped working. He was totally inflexible at that time and dug his heels in in response to (valid) criticism. At some point, for whatever reason, he realised that there were other ways to play football. We now have a starting line up that better suits the players, together with a willingness and ability to change that as necessary. He’s far from the finished article but if he continues to learn he could get there.
Here’s hoping UTI.Turning point, to me, seemed to be that cringeworthy interview with Ollie Turner of BBC Radio Humberside. Perhaps someone at the club (I’d wager Michelle) had a heart-to-heart with Andy, because his approach markedly changed and he seemed to “grow up a bit” for want of a much better way of putting it. I’m talking about his previous inflexibility but also his interaction with those (Ollie Turner and by extension all the fans) who were questioning him or giving him a hard time.
5 users thanked author for this post.
February 12, 2025 at 10:37 am in reply to: Butler interview post-Curzon Ashton (and in recent weeks) #298831Exactly why we should stick with him and back him through rough spells.
Yep, the time for reevaluation is May. Butler made many mistakes, the results were poor and performances not optimal for a while. However, some were all too ready to dismiss the idea that a manager can learn or adapt, with little consideration for the pitfalls of becoming sack happy. Any attempts to say we should stick by Butler with the hope that he can learn and turn things round were made out to be defending the crud that was on display over a period of poor form. I have no idea if Butler will succeed, and the loss of Whitehall is a concern if it isn’t short term, but the detractors didn’t really have it fully clued in with their assessments either, even if some thought they did. We are in a promotion battle, the promises of anything but midtable mediocrity being dreamland were nonsense, as were the claims that we would definitely drop like a stone from some.
Sure, some of those criticising raised valid points and were less certain. Many have now said they have changed opinion again. However, maybe the turnaround shows that it’s maybe best not to form solid opinions of how Butler can’t succeed on short term form. Criticism is expected during such times, but it should be constructive, and it’s important to remember the level we’re at and that these players will make errors.
Everyone’s wounded. Everyone’s got PTSD. From Swann and Hilton. From dropping out of the league and then down to this division. Plus, of course, from the club almost going… So it’s no wonder emotions get hot and high, stress explodes and reason gets burned up in a toxic mix.
The order of the day for the remainder of the season is steady away and calm heads. We should accept the fact we’ve got an inexperienced manager who has been doing well for the last 15 or so games with Division 6 players (who have managed to string results together despite often lacklustre and highly unattractive performances).
That’s not to say “keep your powder dry”. If there’s criticism needed, give it – but constructively. It’s coming up to crunch time, and I don’t know about you but when the pressure’s really on, I already know what’s at stake and I don’t need someone screaming at me that me I’m f*cking sh*t.
4 users thanked author for this post.
February 12, 2025 at 9:55 am in reply to: Butler interview post-Curzon Ashton (and in recent weeks) #298826Exactly why we should stick with him and back him through rough spells.
Someone said to me recently “How are young new managers ever meant to become good managers if they get the sack after two or three crap results?”
The Board’s stated requirement was promotion, and at this stage of the season we’re “in the mix” so we’re on course, all with a green manager and a bunch of (misfit) players.
Beestin & Roberts up front and Fadera starting on the right?
This.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Call me old fashioned but isn’t a detailed strategic plan to raise income from many sources and activities required as opposed to what IA refers to as Phoenix Nights style ideas?
Absolutely. NEXT!
Clunan was nowhere near as bad as Denton. Denton was so bad, I would have taken him off for Kelly. Kouogun was shocking as well, all he had to do was clear the ball behind him for a corner and the prat hooked it forward straight into their player, which resulted in the ball dropping straight into his patch which they scored from.
Boyce gave silly balls away and Rose was guilty of it too. In regards to Denton, that’s the worse I’ve seen him play in an iron shirt. Absolutely shocking. I’d have Evans back in at CB in place of Boyce personally.
Again, as I’ve said elsewhere, we’re in Division 6 with Division 6 players and it can take the eyes some getting used to.
Ok, point in the bank. Let’s make it a 4 1/2 star February.
Surely you mean a 4 1/3 star?
Mainly bar takings in the beginning obviously a small entrance fee £10 ish and like I said start small and build up. Club can Ill afford to take many risks of which a stadium gig most of us to think is a no go.
12p profit a pint? – is it worth the effort?
Your casual pop in / out, 2 pints in an hour drinker will make you 24p
An 8 pint session drinker will tie a table up for say 4 hours and you’ll nearly make a full quid profit.
If someone nicks a couple of bog rolls then that wipes out that profit and leaves you in the excrement.
Stealing ornaments, accidental & deliberate damage / vandalism to seating, furnishings, fixtures etc and then either the ambience of the venue or your bank account is lowered.
To be fair to AWG, at least he came up with an idea. In principle it wasn’t a bad one, sounded like a potentially attractive event. But as you point out, money making opportunity might be quite low – unless the club charged a good-sized fee for the use of their land etc etc etc?
Nicolson out on a perminant deal is being mooted on SM and AB very coy about it in the interview
Started well but went right off the boil. We didn’t make that much of his powerful long throw, and his general passing became weirdly dreadful. Limited opportunities in the last couple of months with seemingly zero impact on the team as a whole… so it makes sense to thank him for his service and see him on his way?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Kouogun didn’t really cover himself in glory, either.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Like Torps was saying, no point in really high balls to Beck that he’s struggling to get a head on, particularly if no ones really around him to latch on to flick ons. That’s how looked to me too. Curzon are a pain with that time wasting but don’t blame them. Roberts should have had a free kick edge of the area second half. Just shoved heavily off the ball.
Agree with this. We’re not getting the best out of Beck at all. He seems to me to be one of those target men who should have a nippy little bugger playing six feet away from him snapping up the bits Beck can feed. We should also be set up to build towards whipping crosses in when he’s up front and in the box, rather than continuing to fanny about.
1 user thanked author for this post.
“He’s out there every week trying to mop up, when we’re in a wipe it on the curtains league”.
“Outside the box thinking”
Gated Bike nights or weekends both bars open, restaurant, camping on training pitch couple of Rock tribute bands, trade stands, food outlets, bike jumble. All without using the stadium at all.
Same with the Scooter’s sub Mod bands instead
Caravan club weekend (and before you laugh they had one at Brumby hall which was well attended).
Start small and build up.Not disagreeing, just wondering how you think the club would make serious money from this?
1 user thanked author for this post.
Deserved to win that. Played some good football. Just didn’t quite fall right with Curzon defending well and deep. Good performance nonetheless.
1-1 was a fair reflection of the game. The lateness of the equaliser could make it seem like we snatched something we perhaps didn’t deserve, but that’s not really the case.
More than a draw? I don’t think so. Good chances went begging at both ends, so…
1 user thanked author for this post.
All good points. So you should now see the futility of the trust buying shares other than their giving money to the club.
No.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Where do you think the machine intends to drag the world?
Nowhere good. But my point was Trump’s ill manners and apparent idiocy are a smokescreen. The original question remains: How might (will) US steel tariffs affect Scunthorpe steelworks and associated businesses?
At the time of the last set of accounts, there were 8.9m shares.
Once Swann had more than 75% of them, which he achieved by converting loans into shares, he cancelled AGMs, as he was allowed to do. He could have forced all shareholders to sell up (as the Glazers did at Man U) once he had 90%+.
Any small shareholding will only ever be symbolic, however meaningful to the individuals and groups holding them, if the major shareholders aren’t willing to engage.
I hold a small number of shares, and am well aware of their worthlessness in reality unless there was a desire amongst major investors to take the club into private ownership (which even Swann avoided, despite his initial hope that every shareholder would donate their shares to him, to “make it easier to dispose of the company” – my first inkling he didn’t necessarily have the club’s interests at heart).
All good points.
As for a membership scheme, it was mentioned maybe £10.00 per month. The only perks that could be offered is a reduction in ticket/shop purchase etc. Giving with one hand taking it away with the other
This is where ‘outside the box thinking’ would come into play, and ‘rewards’ for membership that would not cost the club anything (or anything much) would be the order of the day.
The game in the Lincolnshire Senior Cup played at Bottesford was behind closed doors because we could not afford the security. How can they now afford the security/policing for a potential 10000 attending. They will have to employ personnel to ensure security for that figure and have to pay them!! If only a few hundred turn up those security will still have to be paid. You cannot wait until the day and try and reduce the security personnel when you realise how low the attendance is going to be.
I’ve thought about this particular issue long and hard and, as I said, I sincerely doubt Scunthorpe United FC will be doing more than (effectively) hiring out the stadium to event organisers. The logistics involved in putting on gigs are immense, and the financials leave a margin so thin for the promoter it’s almost not worth doing.
If they are doing more than merely providing the venue, and are organising a festival, underwriting it, promoting it, staging it, running it, then they’d be at serious risk of cutting their own throat in my opinion.
He’ll have forgotten tariffs by next week and will have thought of something new. Like putting viagra in the oceans to increase fishing yields!
If you think he’s a shit-talking clown then I think you underestimate the machinery around him, and where that machine is intending to drag the world.
No
TLDR.
In the recent interview on Iron Hour, Ian Sharp admitted they have made mistakes and will probably make more. I really hope this idea for a 3 day music festival at which they hope to attract a whopping 10k people a day, isn’t one of them. Can’t see that any of the board have experience of organising music events like this and it might explain the pie in the sky target. I hope they give their heads a wobble and think it through properly, and don’t rope in someone who promises the earth but ends up burning them, and ultimately the club
It would be a massive financial risk for the club to undertake, as well as a logistical nightmare. They definitely do not have the expertise required. Just the talk of ‘tribute bands and local acts’ tells you that.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Nice one ironking, and I know your not alone many have done the same.
Different take for me, you probably saw that i would have helped buy the ground but wouldn’t put any extra money into the club.
I’m sure we all love the club/team just the same.
At least you accept that your shares are worthless in monetary terms unlike Apollo who believes they are power.
Anyway like I say nice one and I understand your pride well done.Of course they represent power!
You say they’re worthless… On their own small shareholdings are, as Iron King said, little more than a noble further way to express love for the club (and, for the record, I have some myself and that was also my reason for buying).
But it’s like actual life… Unionise! If you combine all those minimal shareholdings together then they’re significant.
Do you really think if Unity’s 18K was translated into shares (or if the Trust continues its steady acquiring of shares) that wouldn’t represent a serious entity the Club would be obliged to pay attention to?
I haven’t got time to get through the whole of Renée’s novel but one thing it highlights is that Swann did absolutely nothing to grow crowds, even with all the money spent on players. A pretty damning indictment.
It’s worth reading as he raises some sensible points worth thinking about.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
AuthorPosts
