Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Here you go
Credited to Jason Hinsley on the SUFC fb pageThe bell ends on Iron Bru have caused all this with stupid rumours by the half a dozen or so that still bother to post on the site, a site ran by a guy who falsley accused a major fundraiser at SUFC of being a thief and wasn’t man enough to publicly apologise, the same guy that mind boggling the iron trust keep as a committee member Michelle, rest assured the majority of us are 100% behind what you and the other board members are doing and trust you with the future of the club, ignore the morons on Bru and keep doing what you’re doing
I don’t know who this person is but I do know he’s way wide of the mark.
He’s right about Mawgate, though. That was a dreadful error by Matt E, though in the end it did lead to seemingly tighter behaviour and better governance for the fundraising, which is a very good thing.
Campbell pulled off some good saves.
MOTM IMHO
Not the best game but entertaining in patches and the clusters of first half goals was a hoot, as was the bizarre penalty shoot-out to conclude affairs. How many times has that happened in football history (I’ve never seen a team score 0 in a penalty shoot-out)? Nice to see a match played on a decent surface, one or two lacklustre performances, nothing to write home about – a pleasant enough nothing of a night.
There’s always the possibility that there’ll be something ridiculously dramatic like Fitzsimons getting sent off this Saturday, or Roberts getting injured…
Surely with it being quite nip-and-tuck and with so few games left it will go right down to the last game?
1 user thanked author for this post.
… ignore the morons on Bru and keep doing what you’re doing
Ignore the morons on Bru and you probably wouldn’t have a Club.
3 users thanked author for this post.
I can’t see that thread
Who’s the guys name who starts the threadWhich thread are you referring to?
It’s their business not mine
The point is that it might be their business, not yours – but it’s your Club. If you’ve lost that understanding then that’s that.
The galling thing is that Gareth, by association with Iron Hour, was a cheerleader for some of the dog’s abuse directed at Iron Bru personnel during the Hilton era. Despite being proved wrong, none of them have said a conciliatory word. Now that he’s been (briefly) on the receiving end of some awful comments himself, you’d have thought the penny would drop about his (their) own conduct. But still no empathy, awareness, contrition etc. Seemingly the opposite, including a comment from one of his Iron Hour cohorts in particular last night on Facebook. Very very disappointing to see.
I never bother with the Iron Hour podcast .. not my cuppa tea
I did try listening once but I couldn’t bear it (Max Bell).
One big lesson from ‘the Harness era’ is that it’s clearly going to take more, from everybody, for the Club to survive and prosper. That means more than just your match ticket, more than just your replica shirt etc. Many give a great deal already (by way of their volunteering, say), but many others don’t contribute anything meaningful.
I have to add, after everything we’ve been through it’s disheartening that there are still some people (including on here) who consider themselves as supporters but actually their relationship with the Club is strictly transactional and business like, all the time: “Why should I contribute, what am I getting for my money?”
Gareth’s videos are a bit boring, but I really appreciate that he is doing them and has the passion to do them. No-one can fault that.
In general with the Iron Hour crew it seems to me that there’s very little self-awareness. Not all of them, it has to be said, but certainly a couple of them. Particularly over last night’s ‘forgive Gareth’ campaign thread on the Facebook group. Double standards, lack of accountability.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Is the shortfall £65k a month?
“Putting in money every month, 65k a month needed.”
… is the direct quote from the Directors, from Fans64’s notes from the Trust AGM. Is that what they’re putting in, or is it what is required to meet costs?
These in the image posted are clearly from before the current wage structure began to be implemented, and the ones at the link are the ones that have been floating about in recent weeks.
Agree with the OP, even with an army of Stu Maw clones basic fundraising simply isnt gonna be enough and hopefully the club and fans can come up with a solution…
It’s going to require something like a monthly / annual / five year / ten year / lifelong membership scheme and subscription model. It needs to be properly set-up, properly committed to. I personally would sign up to something to put more money in, in this way. I’m not sure I’d expect much more in return than just knowing I was making a difference, after the last few turbulent years and the recent increased awareness of how fragile things are. Other members will want something more for their ‘subs’ and so that is an area where the Club and organised fan groups could engage over ideas.
I listened to the FC100000 guy’s BBC Humberside interview again and, in the cold light of day, to be completely fair to him he made some good points about football clubs in general. However, there is no clear proof of concept for his particular ‘new improved version’ business model. I thought as much as he showed an understanding of football clubs as businesses he showed a clear lack of understanding of football fans.
1 user thanked author for this post.
He certainly went in a blaze of glory then. If the club had let him have some burger vans outside on community day, we’d all still be non the wiser ….
We’d know on Thursday with Gareth’s face all over it.
1 user thanked author for this post.
If McCartney hadn’t had leaked it on twitter
Danny Stamp leaked it during a rant, not McCartney.
Don’t think the unity funding group given the benefit of doubt, and most of us have the best interests of the club at heart and are scunny through and through and being critical of things doesn’t change it.
There were concerning red flags there about abuse of money, though, and so people were probably right to question. As a result they seem to have got their house a little more in order, but I haven’t been paying that much attention.
I do think quite a fair point has been made on Gareth’s statement thread on Facebook, in amongst all the love-in. He got one day of what some people had to endure for much longer during Hilton’s tenure due to his and his podcast’s “dog-whistling” etc about Iron Bru. I’m sure if those responsible for the worst of what he’s had to put up with in the last 24 hours fail to apologise or don’t attempt to make it right somehow, just brushing past it smugly, Gareth and any others offended or on the receiving end will be fine with that?
Cant remember the word she used but a word that ment they were well pissed off not to be given the chance to take it forward.
Dismayed
1 user thanked author for this post.
March 24, 2025 at 7:22 pm in reply to: Calum Roberts and boardroom news from Michelle’s BBC chat #300530See “Sat with our CEO thread”
The Gainsborough Trinity guy.
The Club statement is a carefully worded arse-covering exercise.
2 users thanked author for this post.
With Wondergoals. I have issues with the club statement 1/ It says “they put it out to see what fans thought of it” – they did not Aidan McCartney big fan got wind of something and put it out there . 2/ No deal had been agreed yet a video announcing it had been filmed ! 3/ Why was there so many NDA’s if we had nothing to hide and ‘only’ in discussion. 5/ Seems a different meaning you hear it was a possible new investor but the nab from My Club or FCa100000 said they were looking for club Acquisition. There is a big difference in the 2 words INVESTOR and ACQUISITION.
Where’s point 4 ?!
…they did not Aidan McCartney big fan got wind of something and put it out there
Danny Stamp ranted about it before that, on Facebook.
March 24, 2025 at 6:44 pm in reply to: Calum Roberts and boardroom news from Michelle’s BBC chat #300523Richard Kane ,he loves the camera and attention more than Gareth
Who?
Well worth listening to, a bit of an eye-opener in some respects.
One or two characters on social media turned up their abuse to Zanetti-on-the-mic volume.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Must have missed it, what’s his link to this FC100 fiasco?
He fronted up the Club’s video announcing the FC100000 deal (filmed last week).
2 users thanked author for this post.
‘Death threats’?! Feck is wrong with people? FFS.
I didn’t see any at all online, so perhaps privately.
Now that’s piss poor Michelle and shows how naive she is, just one press of a button on Google would have shown what a shit show they’d done before.
As ever with official statements of any kind from anyone or anywhere, you have to realise that they are political moves and do not necessarily reflect the nuances or (sometimes) the actual truth of events. They are the convenient account of events, or the convenient position to take to be able to move things forward under your own narrative steam. Statements are often designed to be shields (or, indeed, swords).
-
AuthorPosts