Forum Replies Created
-
1 user thanked author for this post.
The second ‘wave’ of acts were due to be announced last night. Second time Zanetti has missed his own deadline.
After his Chester half-time I’d guess it’s rare that he ever misses a line.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Bad debt could also be a purchase of something that can never be repaid.
Or missing cash.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I hope, for the Club’s sake, it comes off. But it’s already got the stink of dead animal about it.
2 users thanked author for this post.
… should it be be explained as commented bt BLT a couple of posts earlier????
Do you mean you want the Club to explicitly say it?
Perhaps there was an agreement not to pursue or reveal that info, in exchange for buying the Club for no fee.
1 user thanked author for this post.
No.
Rather see Hiltons extravagant spending on the team. (Would seem not bad in the end anyway seeing we only lost £250,000)
Now what is extravagant is employing a CEO, a Catering manager, stadium manager all tuther office staff, and a restaurant, all very well and good for a team in the EFL but national league north I don’t think so.
All beyond our control either direction.I don’t think “we only have £250,000 of irretrievable debt to someone who never had any intention of paying it back” truly washes.
Like a turkey paying homage to the slaughterman
1 user thanked author for this post.
Bad debt on a balance sheet would almost certainly be relating to money we are owed that we now no longer think is retrievable. So, who owes us £250k?
Just the use of the words “money we are owed” infers that there was likely to have been some sort of formal loan or repayment agreement. To further walk on eggshells around the elephant in the room, I very strongly suspect that not to be the case.
1 user thanked author for this post.
9 full time staff on the non playing side at the club, the vast majority of them doing more than one task, all of them work incredibly hard and it’s unacceptable that some on here choose to question their commitment or the standard of their work.
Michelle Harness who has been working morning till night up to 7 days a week for over a year to ensure there’s a club for the town to support ably backed by those 9 staff, I’m baffled as to why some on here choose to question it.Lack of awareness of the nitty gritty (what it takes day by day, role by role, task by task) to keep the Club rolling?
3 users thanked author for this post.
Size of operation is a factor. The club is averaging attendances over 4,000, majority home fans, which is a lot more than in the later EFL days. A number of staff part time too.
… plus some volunteering.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Bad debt is a fairly vague term
Isn’t ‘bad debt’ also sometimes used as the accounting term for inexplicably absent money?
1 user thanked author for this post.
There were people at the ground on Saturday handing out flyers for other ‘talk nights’ coming up down at Glanford Park. I think ‘Anfield Legends’ was one, and Andy Cole was the other. Like the motorbike nights, these things are not to everyone’s tastes – but why should they be? Why would every event put on have to appeal to the lowest common denominator? Why, if it’s not to your particular taste, slag it off? As long as the Club makes money on these things then that’s fair enough.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Do we think the accounts will actually surface today? If there’s anything contentious in there, and bearing in mind last week’s drama, won’t the tactic be to wait until after season’s end? There’ll be a small financial hit for late filing – £375 for between a month and three months late, etc…
1 user thanked author for this post.
