[sufc_not_on_tour]

Hmm.
He didn’t call my bluff, I didn’t need to provide any evidence, it was out there for all to see if they could be bothered to look.
It’s still out there now and now others have looked and found it.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Transport booked.
Hopefully a positive outcome for SUFC.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Iron-awe wrote:

I’m waiting for him to provide a link I’m sure he will, bet he takes balloons and a kazoo.

A link to what?
Remind me I’ve slept since the last Spanish Inquisition.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Iron-awe wrote:

pity you don’t share the same enthusiasm watching the Iron.

I do,I sincerely hope that we continue to play the remainder of the season at GP and for many seasons after.
You’re taking the word of an idiot from another thread claiming I don’t attend matches, I can assure you I do.
As already explained, I haven’t this season, I’m waiting for the outcome next Tuesday before I return to GP.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Update.
The case is now to be heard in open court next Tuesday.
Train booked.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

64 wrote:

sufc_not_on_tour wrote:

Why can I not publicly name the party involved?
Because if the debt is satisfied within 30 days then the CCJ will not be made public and wiped from the record.
If it isn’t satisfied then it will be made public for all to see, in which case there will be no need for me to name the creditor.

Not true “FACT!”

CCJs and your credit rating
If you get a county court judgment (CCJ) or a high court judgment, it will stay on the Register of Judgments, Orders and Fines for 6 years.

Banks and loan companies use this information to decide whether to give you credit or loans.

If you pay the full amount within one month, you can get the judgment removed from the register.

Write to the court to say you’ve paid. You’ll need to send proof of payment from the person or business you owed money to.

If you pay after one month
If you pay after one month, you can get the record of the judgment marked as ‘satisfied’ in the register.

It will stay on the register for 6 years but people searching the register will see that you’ve paid.

Write to the court to say you’ve paid. You’ll need to send proof of payment from the person or business you owed money to.
It goe4s on record straight away according to the government

https://www.gov.uk/county-court-judgments-ccj-for-debt/ccjs-and-your-credit-rating

This is what I stated.
“If the debt is satisfied within 30 days then the CCJ will not be made public and wiped from the record”
This is what 64 quoted from the government site “ If you pay the full amount within one month, you can get the judgement removed from the register”

Slightly different wording, exactly the same meaning, FACT.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

I don’t need to but I’m going to quash some of the absolute crap that Prat O Fake is spouting.
Yes I am a supporter, I have been for near on 60 years, I’m also a shareholder and have been for many years.
Do I attend games, last season I did, prior to that I didn’t because of a dislike of the way Swann was running the club I’ve supported since I was a child.
This season, there’s only been 2 home games (pre season I never attend), I haven’t attended because of a mistrust of Hilton and refuse to line his pockets.
Once the outcome of next weeks court case become clear or Hilton pays Swann I will start attending again.
As for Pat O Fake stating on another thread that I don’t know who the creditor for the CCJ is, yes I do know, what annoys him is that he doesn’t know and he can’t handle the fact that someone knows something he doesn’t.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

I see Scunthorpe’s top lad on the clappers page has picked up on this and is claiming he’s going to Leeds to report live on the case.
2 things.
Firstly, reporting live on a county court case will see him locked up for contempt.
Secondly, the case is being heard in chambers and there’s no public access.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Deereyme66 wrote:

What happened to the previous accountant? I thought the club were using Dave’s Ilkeston Town accountant a while back? Seems like a high turnover of staff going on.

You’re right, Dave’s mate came to deal with the clubs finances.
He’s gone, he wasn’t here very long.
Extremely concerning as wages are due in a week, also could it be sheer coincidence that the club were advertising his position the day before the CCJ was registered?

[sufc_not_on_tour]

New vacancy.
For the second time in a matter of months there is a vacancy for a club accountant.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Why can I not publicly name the party involved?
Because if the debt is satisfied within 30 days then the CCJ will not be made public and wiped from the record.
If it isn’t satisfied then it will be made public for all to see, in which case there will be no need for me to name the creditor.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

The CCJ was for a supplier during the current owners tenure, FACT.
Was he given ample notice that a claim was to be made, yes, FACT.
Did he ignore it, yes, FACT.
Do I know who that supplier is, yes I do , FACT.
Can I divulge that publicly, no that would be wrong and I’m not prepared to do that, FACT.
Do I care if the usual suspect don’t believe me, no I don’t.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Revert to type, along comes Iron-Bore spouting his usual bile like a deranged stalker.
You’re confusing me with someone who cares, do with the information relating to the new case number and court date as you wish.
It’s FACT.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

This was the original case but it has now been moved from the Commercial court to the County court, hence the change of case number.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

It’s the case number for Coolsilk v Scunthorpe United to decide whether the club play at GP or not.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

My error, could you amend it to August please.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Bishops Finger wrote:

This is garbage. The sponsors on Saturday got a few plates of party food which would have looked more at home at a six year olds birthday party instead of the three-course meal they had paid for and were promised!!!

I can confirm this, it was sausage rolls, cheesy wotsits and a few sandwiches.
The sponsorship price was to include a thee course meal.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Coors £3.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Solely for the benefit of Northumbiron.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Northumbiron wrote:

Right or wrong, a description of what the OP refers to would be useful instead of the usual cryptic messaging.

Simple research will show you irrefutable proof what it’s concerning.
Only you have posted without doing the research.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

The 1st of many, others will be for far more significant amounts.

1 user thanked author for this post.

North Lincolnshire Irons

[sufc_not_on_tour]

WonderGoals wrote:

Well Hilton showed proof of funds which went through Swanns solicitors, so he must have. If he didn’t show proof of funds he would have never found himself in a position to become chairman.

Definitely showed proof of funds. That’s a certainty because I’m sure I read a statement from Swann himself when he mentioned it. If you show proof of funds then you must have the money.

My understanding is that he’s waiting for Swann to sort the problems before purchasing but swann was reluctant, therefore Hilton never bought the ground. This could easily be solved if Swann just sorted out the problems but appeared that Hilton mentioning the things he was worried to Swann got his back up and he’s dug his heels in.

FFS Burney, you’ve logged onto the wrong forum, you should be on the happy clappers Facebook.

1 user thanked author for this post.

GTiron

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Interested Bystander wrote:

The modus operandi will be to take it to the eleventh hour and then ask Swann for a sweetener to leave.

I don’t think that will be the case, I suspect he’ll be gone before the case goes to court, in fact I wouldn’t be surprised if he hasn’t gone already.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Reading that ironfromafar, two things, 1st, anything that Herbert says should be taken with a pinch of salt, 2nd, Hilton is almost certainly looking for a way out.
My own thoughts on the upcoming court case, I think that the case will be unopposed and Swann will get an eviction order.
Unfortunately that will leave with nowhere to play as Hilton will have gone.
Was it ever going to end any other way?
I sincerely hope I’m wrong.

1 user thanked author for this post.

bartonscorpion

[sufc_not_on_tour]

I’ve no idea what the evidence the judge in Leeds will accept and who gives evidence and how a ruling will be made.
Yesterday, Hilton ignoring and sticking two fingers up to the council and SAG’s safety certificate by admitting close on a thousand extra supporters into GP above the amount allowed, followed by him abusing the council and SAG publicly on Facebook will certainly not do his case any good.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

This is a post from Hilton’s new best friend and public spokesman on the clappers group forum.

“ Where the hell do Humberside Police get their intelligence from.
There was never ever going to be trouble today, welcoming Jimmy Deans former club to Glanford Park.
Peterborough’s attendance at home was half what we took away last week, so they were never going to bring many, but the police decided to put the fear of god in them anyway.
All the police presence today is a waste of manpower and if I was the club I’d not be paying no police bill.
Talk about getting paid for doing naff all.
Oh and the SAG officer can suck my left one too….. lot more than 2500 here you jobsworth”

That’ll go down well with the powers that be!

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Iron-awe wrote:

post something meaningful.

Oh the irony Iron-Bore.

[sufc_not_on_tour]

Decent enough squad for the league we’re in but if they are being managed by a pub team manager…………

1 user thanked author for this post.

CMC

[sufc_not_on_tour]

I missed a word out on my post above, it should read that the club have NO input on the amount of police officers deployed around the outside of the stadium.

2 users thanked author for this post.

let_me_in, Awaywego

[Author]

Posts