Forum Replies Created
-
2 users thanked author for this post.
He has sent receipts for HMRC, official club matchday breakdowns, internal club email correspondence and with HMRC, a copy of Januarys and Aprils payroll. Plus other things I’m happy to share. He has blanked out individual staff wages though so we cannot see what players are on individually.
Jan payroll £180,000
Apr payroll £213,000
My godGet sharing it on here then Herbert stop beating around the bush.
It’s not Herbert is it Stuart!
I’ve never read so much absolute crap in my life.
Hilton wouldn’t know the truth if it smacked him in the face.
He’s a pathological liar.
When the article part 2 comes out, you’ll all see the truth.1 user thanked author for this post.
Following a discussion at GP last night with someone who would know, I can confirm 100% that Herbert is subject to a “club ban” and is not allowed to enter GP.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Just so I’m not mistaken, is this Herbert character the guy who became best mates with Hilton, took over the Facebook group, tried to get peoples addresses, made veiled threats and is on crown court bail for some sort of football related criminal charge ?
yes, he’s due in Minshall street crown court in April, where he will not only receive a football banning order but highly likely a jail sentence.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Officially…… Yes he is banned.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Same as Hilton’s but his got the transfer embargo lifted as well.
Not completely true.
Hilton used part of the funds that were in the clubs account to part pay the HMRC debt and come to a monthly payment arrangement, which incidentally he didn’t stick to hence the new application for a winding up order.
Because of the arrangement the transfer embargo was lifted.
The statement by Hilton that we were days away from being wound up wasn’t true either, no judge in the history of football has ever wound a club up on the first application for a winding up order, they are always given time to pay.
Southend is a prime example, research will show you other clubs have never been wound up at the first application either.2 users thanked author for this post.
Do they still sell scarfs NI? One of the debts was reportedly from Macron for unsold scarfs. Never wore one since the red and white days when you had to wear it round your wrist.
The debt to Macron was for an unpaid invoice for kit followed by being sued for breach of contract when Hilton turned to Kelme as Macron wouldn’t supply this seasons kit as the club hadn’t paid their invoice.
The CCJ for unpaid scarves was from a different supplier.1 user thanked author for this post.
It doesn’t disappoint me Cass we all have different views, I just can’t forgive Turnbull for threatening the protesters with police action after telling me personally he was in it for the fans, and I don’t trust Sharp if he gets fed up he’s made it quite clear he wants the money he puts in back
Two things in response:-
There is little doubt in my mind that LT was a mouthpiece and spoke under instruction. I’d consider what he told you represents his true feelings.
If Ian Sharpe loaned the money to pay the wages then of course he would expect it back. We don’t know the terms of the arrangement do we?I can and will answer this.
The money the club received from Ian Sharp was a loan, it was entered into the clubs accounts as a loan, I know this to be a fact and have seen it.
It was never a gift, it was never intended to be a gift.
There’s only ever been one person that ever claimed that it wasn’t a loan and that was Hilton and he has been proved more than once to be economical with the truth!4 users thanked author for this post.
Looking at all this from a different angle.
IB has posted a lot on here, always anti Hilton and the vast majority on here want to crucify him but what he’s posted he’s always backed it up with proof.
The vast majority has turned out to be true, the remainder that hasn’t been proved but may yet prove to be true.
Today, Hilton makes a statement on many things but without any proof, these are all things that he claims are going to happen but as yet none proven.
You’re all taking his word for it.
I don’t know IB, regardless of whether he has a personal agenda to do with Hilton matters not, he has a track record of his claims coming true, ask yourself does Hilton have the same track record?2 users thanked author for this post.
, 