Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
His current ramblings on Twitter about the ADL, who are accusing him of becoming lapse on anti-Semitism, which they say has worsened since he took over. Conflicting opinions on whether it has got worse is not the issue in itself for me. The issue is that Musk has responded by saying that the ADL are the real causes of anti-Semitism. So, Jews are essentially to blame for hate towards them. Alongside this, he is going round liking tweets by neo-Nazis. It’s similar to what happened in Labour, with no critical evaluation of the position taken, and they end up palling round with the worst because of their suredness that they don’t have an issue. It is of little surprise that the worst of the left wing anti-Semites have come out batting for Musk:
A more charitable interpretation by me is that Musk isn’t necessarily anti-Semitic, but is blind to it and doesn’t care. Which isn’t good either and wasn’t good enough for Corbyn.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Never mind atheists, but Christian, Muslim and Hindu scientists are embarrassed by creationist misunderstanding of physics.
Hopefully the curse doesn’t strike for Buxton!
There were warnings about this years ago, but the Tories will ignore that for convenience and to avoid taking responsibility for anything.
They have told us how important it is to be small state and stating that short termist fiscal responsibility is necessary for the economy. Sunak cutting school repair budgets for economic management. Yet this has, again, led to long term pain and crumbling infrastructure. It’s all very well and good moaning about not trusting government to address problems, because institutions are ‘useless’, but the shrinking of the state and lack of such institutions (bureaucratic as they may be) has led to issues of this nature. This issue is just one highlight of how small statist, ‘more with less’ arguments just doesn’t work.
We need insfrastructure for our vital services, and that requires management.
You have to admire bpg for parroting the same questions over and over again, despite them having answered (and not appearing to have understood), while acting so cocksure.
Peterson doesn’t seem to be in the most healthy place, mentally, to me. His tweets and snippets of him talking that I see seem odd and not the sign of someone most content. I actually feel sorry for him because of it and wish him the best. Musk, on the other hand, has more influence and is definitely courting the worst on the right by his dog whistles, outright blaming of Jews, palling around with explicit white supremacists/nationalists, while pretending to be the victim. A man with a victim complex and grievances, while actually having some power, is a worry.
I guess both teams were placed in the Midlands section. Which I take umbridge to as a proud northern lad. :-)
1 user thanked author for this post.
Been listening to some more guru stuff:
https://decoding-the-gurus.captivate.fm/episode/interview-with-jonathan-howard-on-covid-contrarians
Pleased to see the Chomsky episode is up. I am pleased they are covering more lefty gurus.
1 user thanked author for this post.
September 2, 2023 at 9:08 pm in reply to: Yet another…’what have you been listening today?’ Thread #2709711 user thanked author for this post.
Aye. I would like to hear Peter Kay’s take on council pop.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I will just say that I maybe read too much into it as arrogance. I still disagree with the comments and how it was worded, and think it’s too dismissive of other views, but I should maybe learn to keep my opinionated gob shut sometimes. :-) I realise I can be blunt myself sometimes.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I’ve always found you pretty reasonable in previous exchanges, Sidey. I don’t see you or any other folks I’ve taken issue with in this thread as idiots and haven’t questioned your right to disagree. I also don’t think that it would have been useful for me to throw around insults and accusations although in various ways they’ve been fired at me. I guess what this shows me is the level of passion which is evoked by this Trumpian era in US politics.
I have had respect for you where we disagree. I am not bothered about the Trump support, it’s hardly a secret. It was the insinuations against anyone who disagrees with you, which seemed dismissive to me. Also, I got bored of seeing this on a football thread. Then again, I am probably contributing to that now. :-)
I did read it and I don’t think you are being so open in your intention. I think there was a definite charge there and it came across to me as an arrogant dismissal. So, I don’t buy your ‘speculation’ excuse. But, hey ho, my response was more of a plea to move this to non-football and say that plenty of others invested in US politics disagree. The final bit was just my opinion, but if that’s ‘going off on one’ I may was well shut up, because stating an opinion which disagrees with you will always be ‘going off on one’.
Hardly touched a nerve. That’s just more of your arrogance, in my opinion. However, I am pleased to know the rest of us idiots cannot possibly disagree, because to do so means we cannot know as much as your esteemed self.
As for the rest, I was just stating my opinion. Which seems to offend you and going ‘blimey’ like the ‘balance’ you love to put and how disagreeing with you must make me some irrationa; ‘orange man bad’ hysteriuc. Like I say, arrogance and not very balanced, in my opinion, from yourself.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I have googled him, so I think I know why he’s a questionable referee to say the least, but you are being rather cryptic.
Never heard of this place before. This Barnsley lad seems to like it though.
Would you rather it be a Russki?
I suggest that all this wittering about Trump is moved to non-football.
I also do not think you appear that balanced, JI, and sound very agenda laden yourself. You are also coming across rather arrogantly with assumptions about how much people pay attention to US politics. I know plenty who do so just as much as you and see Trump’s whining conspiracies for what they are.
Sidey
I was at work(job was Victorious Festival in Portsmouth) and two drunk Scottish lesbians armed with nerf guns started talking to me then said “hands up stop chatting up my girlfriend “then shot me in the groinGood shot. :-)
I got shot in the groin by two drunk Scottish lesbians last weekend,my job is weird sometimes
How did that come about? :-)
Aye, for the club. Not for the owner and his own problems. I support Scunthorpe Utd FC, not David Hilton FC. He has the money to fight his own battles.
Yes he does which is why he quite rightly thanked the supporters who set it up for the sentiment but asked them to remove it!
Which is why I said he rightfully nipped it in the bud.
2 users thanked author for this post.
It would, but as I say, he can afford it and I find the blind trust in Hilton in that alarming. Triggering is not making an astonished comment on this, but being hurt by others’ opinions. Like on that Facebook group, where dissenting opinions can get them removed.
Aye, for the club. Not for the owner and his own problems. I support Scunthorpe Utd FC, not David Hilton FC. He has the money to fight his own battles.
If only the institutions were impartial and didn’t investigate a president for rule breaking. That always ends well.
Sarcasm aside, I do find that view concerning among Republicans. The idea that it’s sacriligeous to hold democratic standards against someone where there is reason to suspect there’s been rule breaking. Typically, it’s only been against their guy though. Wanting Democrats locked up, no matter how spurious, is often fair game.
That will be it here. No discussions from me on this now, given that this is a football thread.
I just think spending money on a court case to help him when he can afford it daft and cultish. Sorry.
Making a comment is hardly being triggered. If people want to spend their money on a millionnaire, fine, but I find it astonishing. I do agree with PorthlevenIron’s comment.
I can’t be bothered getting into a debate on this forum, but I think there’s a strong element of Trump supporters who act in a highly cultish manner. Rigged elections, Qanon etc. If any Republican leader now criticises Trump, their popularity will plummet and their integrity will be questioned and accused of being deep state elitists.
I would say the analogy fits, as it would with Corbynites, Scottish nats, FBPE supporters, Johnsonites etc. Of course some who support these are not so hardline, but that doesn’t take away the cultish element of their fanbase.
1 user thanked author for this post.
I think it will boil down to it being a community asset, Swann has reneged on stuff on the deal and/or there are other issues etc. As I initially said, hence why I said if he is found to lose. I don’t pretend to know the outcome.
You presume too much. I have watched, read and come across such before and know that a response will provoke a pointless debate with you.
-
AuthorPosts