[Siderite]

Iron Age wrote:

bartonscorpion wrote:

I must admit that I am really disappointed that only Iron-Awe has attacked me, he is correct in saying that I live in the past, yes those were the times when we could afford to eat well, have a new house built when still in our early twenties, enjoy our jobs, easily pay our mortgages and elect / gas bills, enjoy our spare time without looking at a tv, lapton, notebook or telephone in our faces 15 hours a day, have a nice car with petrol being 25 litrs for £1, and not having 400,000 imigrants entering our shores per year, with 45,000 paying crooks to bring them to our shores, and our tax payers keeping 65,000 of them in hotels at a cost of over £8 million per day. Yes Iron-Awe they were the days, and there were no protests marching in masses for the likes of Hammas, lets see what bile that brings back from you I-A.
He is about the only member of the Forum Six that still cannot bare any other view but his own.

I am not a Jew, not am I a Muslim, I am however a Christian.
Should I ignore the plight of Palestinian Christians? If I plead for a ceasefire am I supporting Hamas?
Palestinian Christians are treated no better than their Muslim brothers.
If you went to Bethlehem at Christmas who would you see at the church of the Nativity?
If you went to Jerusalem at Easter, who would you see at the church of the holy sepulchre?
Yes, that’s right, Palestinian Christians.
I support a ceasefire, I support those who march for a ceasefire.
Hamas is a hateful terrorist organisation, Israel is supposed to be a civilized, democratic country, they are supposed to be the adults in the room.
Stop the killing.

Hamas have said that they won’t stop until Israel and Jews are annihilated. They keep reiterating. A ceasefire just means they will do this again. Supporting a ceasefire doesn’t mean personal support for Hamas, but I don’t see how it leads to anything but more of October 7th pogroms, rocket launches and more stealing of aid and resources so Hamas can attack Israel and Hamas leaders can bolster their own bank accounts in Qatar.

Why will Hamas respect a ceasefire when they keep breaking them? October 7th was during a ceasefire, so it will just happen again and again.

[Siderite]

Yeah, I am sure those chanting from the river to the sea and nodding along to some idiot calling for the destruction of Israel are completely bothered by Hamas.

[Siderite]

Heath wrote:

It’s a disgrace these do gooders protesting for an agreement made by opposing sides in a war to stop fighting for a certain time; a truce on Armistice day!!

Many only seem bothered by one. Singing the songs of the other, being organised by people with interesting links.

If these protests were about peace, they wouldn’t be about ‘destroying Israel’ as the chants and placards of many say and people would be happy to have anti-Hamas placards or supportive messages for the hostages. None do, and the few who turned up just got booed and hissed. Many of the people involved are as scummy as some Patriotic Alternative or BNP rally.

Many going are not like this, but they are joining up with those with views they would shun if they had another context.

[Siderite]

Sunak is too weak to back or sack her. Doesn’t want the blowback either way, so looks like a timid mouse.

[Siderite]

Awaywego wrote:

Hilton Built a squad to get out this division in the first season down here that’s what we all wanted. If we do get out first time jobs a good un whatever the inflated wages we’re paying.

I also wanted a club to support even if we didn’t get promoted and it went caput, because of him, long before season end.

[Siderite]

When he was interested at Bury, the Bury AFC members asked him why he was interested in the club and during this he said the land, so you could be right. Run the club down, make as much money off ponzi schemes and the club’s money in the meantime, then sell off the land, and walk away leaving the rest to deal with the consequences.

[Siderite]

[Siderite]

My understanding is that the exact origin on the Philistines are under research, but were more from Cyprus (possibly a result of the collapse of the collapse of the Mycenae). Arabs are a Semitic people, I think

[Siderite]

Nor was it called ‘Palestine’ in the days of the Philistines. My understanding is that Palestinians are likely a mix of Arabs and those living there. By the time of the Romans the majority of the population was more Jewish and Philistines had declined. The more likely case is that Palestinians are a mix of Arab-Jewish inter-relations and it does nothing to disservice the claim that Israel has no legitimacy.

[Siderite]

The Palestinians are not Phillistines. Philistines weren’t Arabic.

[Siderite]

I don’t disagree with that, but I think it can do better on some issues.

[Siderite]

I was just saying that he has his blind spots in my opinion. I don’t think BBC News is all bad, and has many good points. My main issue with Al-Ahli was that it undermined trust in the cooperation and it left me frustrated.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Deereyme66

[Siderite]

His reporting of Al-Ahli was poor to say the least and was irresponsible in my opinion. Such a sensitive event and him and others just put out a Hamas claim without evidence. They should have stated a hospital has been hit by an undetermined source, as headline, and made it clear that any claims were not concrete until the actual evidence arrived.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Just Iron

[Siderite]

I wouldn’t call the British Mandate of Palestine a country in its own right. It was part of the British Empire and not subject to its own control. Before then it was part of the Ottoman Empire and before then it was part of Egyptian led Mameluk Empire. Going further back, the first mention of Palestine was from the Roman Empire, who used it to replace the name of Israel to quash Jewish rebellions against Rome.

None of this is to delegitimise Palestine’s existence, there should be a two-state solution, but it doesn’t delegitimise Israel’s existence either. Jews have existed in the ‘Holy land’ for centuries and most of Israel’s Jews do not actually hail from Europe, but from North Africa and the Middle-East.

The Brits flip-flopped over the mandate and made various promises to different groups. By the end they were not so pro-Israel and the state was only created after Israelis, USA and the UN pushed on it. Before then, I have read tales of Jewish immigrants in Cyprus kept in poor conditions as they tried to go to Israel. It should also be obvious why they were fleeing Europe in the late 40s. There could have been peace there and then, but hostility was there from the start from other Arab states. Was all of it good from the Israeli side? No, I am aware of population resettlements (though, it was not one-sided), but the idea that this somehow delegitimises Israel? Nah.

The states around them were also subject to being created through French and British interests, such as Iraq, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon. This too has created parts of the country with sects who might want their own nation state, divided by these past decrees. See the Kurds in northern Iraq and Syria, for example. Yet the bemoaning about this is far less.

Regardless, grievance mongering is not creating any hope of peace in the region. Israel is here to stay, and as much as they need to stop things like the settlements of the West Bank and its own divisive rhetoric, the destructive talk of Hamas and its supporters is only creating future hate.

[Siderite]

I would place more trust in European and American democracies above Russia or China. Not to blindly trust, but we have mechanisms to force out truths with a more independent judiciary, media and functioning opposition. Russia and China just don’t have that, everything is just a subsidiary of the regime (pretty much) and what little critical means exists gets stomped out.

[Siderite]

I am not exactly surprised, but it’s disappointing still. Fortunately, there is little international appetite for that, there would be huge international pressure and domestic opinion is sour.

[Siderite]

Aye, but I am pleased IB did reveal information as he did.

One thing I did notice is that the phone lines are back up now. A promising sign that Harness and co are repairing the damage done.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Deereyme66

[Siderite]

Israel will have "overall security responsibility" in Gaza for "indefinite period" after war, Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu says in interview https://t.co/7gBZE0ejZL

— CNN International (@cnni) November 7, 2023

Worrying and ominous. He may be a busted flush, since he’s deeply unpopular and might be removed after the war, but this isn’t good.

[Siderite]

300000+ dead Germans 1939-1945 (civilians only). Keep cheering the Allied forces. I like a good war crime.

None of this is good, I should say. Should Israel do more? I think so, certainly regarding aid. I don’t see how Israel stopping will make things more palatable, as Hamas firing rockets and looking to repeat pogroms is not a solution.

All could end if they just give up.

[Siderite]

For all these years I have been thinking I have some fortune in having a roof over my head. Turns out I could have been a lot easier on the streets with a tent, apparently.

[Siderite]

It should have been Alan introducing this, not Mahyar. I nearly turned off after the barrage of cliches at the start.

[Siderite]

I know; I wasn’t saying you were accusing these comedians of mocking the dead. I don’t see the harm in satirical humour even in these times if the context and subject matter are appropriate. Even if cringeworthy.

[Siderite]

Correction: isn’t a war.

[Siderite]

It’s not them they’re poking fun at, but the gullible activists on campus. My biggest problem is that it’s not very funny, nor is mr buzz word introducing it.

[Siderite]

The major difference is that I, and not many others, are saying this is a war. I didn’t say ‘launch a war’, because that was started when Hamas undertook the October 7 pogrom. Which is again a different context from Russia invading because ‘Ukraine is a fake country’ and for Russian imperialism. But, hey, why let that get in the way of assuming anyone who disagrees has to be duplicitous?

1 user thanked author for this post.

bartonscorpion

[Siderite]

Iron-awe wrote:

So distressing seeing an Israeli father who thought his young daughter had originally been killed by Hamas, pleading for her release tonight after finding out there is a good chance she was kidnapped and taken to Gaza by Hamas. He begs for compassion from Hamas and to allow all the young Israeli children kidnapped to be released as a start to stopping the conflict. It was also reported tonight that out of over 10,000 people murdered by Israel in Gaza in the last four weeks, 4000 of these were Palestinian children. Compassion indeed.

The Israeli makes a point which I have thought for a while. No-one other than sadists thinks war is the optimal situation right now; my point has not been that this is good, but I don’t see how it can be avoided given the situation. Though, surely the best way out of this is for the hostages to be released, Hamas to surrender and free Palestine from the grip of an insane cult who endangers their lives directly through antagonising Israel and killing Palestinians who go against it. Only yesterday I saw photos and videos of Hamas operating in hospitals and artillery located next to or in schools and mosques. This is deliberate placement to ensure civilian casualties.

What I think should happen is that Arab countries should demand Hamas that the gig is up, they have no support from them and surrender with hostages released. If so, the US and UK would have no desire to continue backing Israel should Netanyahu and his far-right allies want to make territorial gains. If this was to happen we would get rid of Hamas and the war would be over. It would mean Fatah would likely get control of Gaza, and I am under no illusion as to them being good. They are still anti-Semitic, but I don’t think so mad to do anything like October 7. It would be a nudge to at least normalising things.

I get why people focus on Israel, as they are the ones launching a military operation into Gaza, but we can achieve peace by arguing for Hamas to give up too. That would also alleviate fears that future ceasefires could be broken and longer term peace is more likely. Calling on Israel to stop is one thing, but Hamas show no indication to stop rocket fire or attacks on Israeli citizens (and they don’t care who they kill – Bedouin, Israeli Arabs, Druze etc were all killed on Oct 7). That isn’t peace. However, if I was to say this at one of these ‘peace marches’ I suspect there would be a lot of anger directed at me from the so called pacifists.

I share Emily Maitlis’s sentiments here for Palestine.

pic.twitter.com/nRNcJHmO5U

— emily m (@maitlis) November 6, 2023

You can see the reaction of the Palestinian activists here in the replies, who leap to the defense of Hamas, despite claiming they don’t support them.

1 user thanked author for this post.

bartonscorpion

[Siderite]

[Siderite]

I agree, whenever I discuss this (or anything) in person it can be a lot less fraught, because it’s easier to feed off others’ emotions. They aren’t so obvious online and can lead to misunderstandings and spiraling, as I have probably been guilty of here. Again, I apologise for getting heated.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Deereyme66

[Siderite]

Deereyme66 wrote:

‘you have moaned about lengthy posts anyway.’

No I haven’t! I made a comment about your lengthy posts. That’s not moaning. And you’re accusing me of slander? Ffs.

It was probably a misinterpretation of a criticism. I realise it’s an emotional subject and to have found it frustrating to be made out to not care about the humanitarian crisis. That was the main issue for me. Like I say, it’s devastating. I just can’t see how else it can play out. Urban warfare will never be safe, we have seen it in other cases to less outrage. I realise I snapped in response to that. I don’t think I have been unfair to others on here in their motives previously, so it rankled. I have criticised Israel a lot in this thread, maybe not for responding to an act of war, but I don’t think I am so blind to Israel’s faults. I am not going to criticise Israel more than I would other countries for such conduct in war. They should allow more aid in. Though, this can all end if Hamas surrender and give up the hostages. There has been little to no pressure on that, so I do find some unbalance myself from some. Palestinians deserve better than Hamas, who see their lives as pawns for their ideology and rule with an iron fist. I cannot see how peace can be achieved long term with them in existence as a credible force.

[Siderite]

What should be happening then? Israel not launching any offensive and accepting Hamas wanting to kill them? Break more ceasefires, launch more rockets? This is what I mean and I get attacked as if I am evil for it. Yet I don’t think many who speak of the need for a ceasefire come up with anything satisfactory for how it can be just lived with, which is an appalling thought anyway.

I admit that I responded in emotion, but I don’t think I have been the only one twisting. I have repeatedly said that I think many, including those on here, are motivated in good conscience. Shame the ‘balanced’ ones can’t for any defense of Israel for its right to self-defend.

[Author]

Posts