Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Remembering England, the way things used to be… #282222
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    They won’t be eating no woke vegan sausage rolls.

    in reply to: Bring back Hill #282182
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Damon should know a thing or two about speed of play.

    in reply to: The time has come the Walrus said #282159
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Jewish Space Lasers on Tour #282158
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Possibly the maddest US representative out there. Outdoes Boebert, somehow.

    in reply to: Refreshing change Joe #282047
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    A link might be helpful. I don’t know who this guy is.

    in reply to: Make Rochdale great again #282023
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It did amuse me to see Peter Bottomley wearing a Ukrainian flag tie when walking next to the Putinist in Parliament today.

    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    in reply to: Is it really because you are the problem? #281902
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    In other words, a ceasefire would need unconditional release of hostages, not more attempts by Hamas to regroup and regather strength.

    in reply to: Is it really because you are the problem? #281900
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    And I am sure that one was full of reasonable demands and Hamas would be trustworthy, just as they were last time when they broke it in a week. A ceasefire will have to be feasible.

    in reply to: Is it really because you are the problem? #281897
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Hamas are still holding hostages, and still refusing ceasefires because they will have to give them up, so there won’t be cessation of conflict until they do. I hope there is a ceasefire, but the reality is that there won’t be one unless both agree.

    in reply to: Is it really because you are the problem? #281884
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I could keep saying that I understand why the conflict is happening and think there is justification there, but not with a lot of how it’s conducted, but I will still get the same questions and accusations.

    in reply to: Is it really because you are the problem? #281870
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I would like to add that just because the victims are the victims of urban warfare, it doesn’t mean that it is good or even justified by those who launched strikes. Victims of Russia’s aggression in Syria and Ukraine are the victims of an unjustifiable war and careless regard for human life. Israel may have a more justifiable reason for war, in my opinion, but that doesn’t mean I don’t think they can’t do more to prevent civilian casualties. I would say they can, but it doesn’t make the victims any different in cause to the Syrians or Ukrainians in the bombing campaigns of Mariupol or Aleppo.

    in reply to: Is it really because you are the problem? #281869
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It’s not an ‘excuse’. It’s the reality; every other urban war looks very similar, and some cases worse (Mariupol may have had 4 times the deaths in half the time, for example), but it’s not a competition. I am yet to be convinced that Palestinian civilian deaths are any worse than Yemeni, Syrian or Ukrainian, nor why Israeli is inherently worse than Russian, British or American. Civilian casualties in war are tragic and horrible. I have said that I think Israel’s actions are not without problems, to say the least, but that doesn’t mean the horrific casualties in this conflict can be judged in different standards to others. I have no doubt this will be ignored for more self-righteous proclamations about it and ‘supporting Netanyahu’ or whatever. Even though I think he’s a grotesque fascist, but anything other than slamming him or Israel as the worst person or country ever must mean I am a ‘Netanyahu supporter’ (nuance be damned). Never mind that the cause of this was Hamas, but I guess that makes me ‘pro-Netanyahu’ because thinking Israel have a right to at least defend itself (even if I am less so of how it is being conducted) and not accept its citizens being kidnapped and slaughtered by Islamic fascists means I am a fan of Likud and its gang of fascists or something.

    in reply to: If you support Israel #281861
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I get that. There is no clear ‘good guy’ who has done no wrong to the other in this conflict, but this is the nature of urban warfare. It’s brutal and similar has happened in other conflicts. Israel could and should do better, I think, in how they conduct the conflict, but the conflict was initiated by Hamas, so they carry a lot of blame too for what’s happening. Not like that absolves the problems in aid being sluggish, a tactic of war reminiscent of Bush in Iraq or Israeli soldiers raiding houses and posing with clothes etc. There won’t be a solution until the powers that be bring both together and cause a cessation, but Hamas don’t seem interested unless they get unreasonable demands met (including rejecting ceasefires because they don’t want to give up hostages).

    in reply to: If you support Israel #281855
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Hard to have negotiations for a ceasefire when Hamas keeps rejecting them* because it’s so vital that they keep their hostages apparently.

    *and even if they did agree, they’d only use it to siphon money into preparing to attack Israel again and again, as they always have done.

    in reply to: If you support Israel #281847
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It’s obviously disgusting if this happebed, but has it been verified as an incident of firing? Or is it like al-Ahli where random sources just get trusted?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Please prècis for me #281775
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I’m just pointing out that the location data from the tweet says nothing about the authorship of those messages, just that you tweeted it from there, and is not a clue about the identity either way.

    in reply to: Please prècis for me #281771
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Is the fact that it’s from New Waltham not a clue?

    Not really, since New Waltham is indicating that fans64 tweeted the screenshots from there. It doesn’t mean the message was written in New Waltham. I don’t think fans64 is Hilton or the person who wrote that message.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Please prècis for me #281767
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I wouldn’t expect Hilton to be truthful and attacks on others’ character were something he did and encouraged. It’s hard to have certainty given it’s not verified, but I don’t see why it can’t be Hilton based off what was said.

    in reply to: Please prècis for me #281765
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Sounds like the patter he’d come out with though, and similar to what that itonironiron account was spouting at the end of last year on here.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Please prècis for me #281722
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Now that he has no control, his excuses and finger wagging just comes across as pathetic.

    Yeah, we have to commit to a lower budget because of him. The division he tried to create while he was bad enough, we don’t need him trying to undermine the new board for his own ego. At least Swann has generally slunk into the shadows, only commenting when he felt he had to in order to present his side.

    in reply to: Massive win #281685
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    What Rene is trying to say is that we haven’t had a case where we only had a run of 3 wins in a row before draw or defeat. When we have won 3 in a row, we went on to win again, so he classes it as a 4 game winning streak.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Massive win #281638
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Thought we played a bit better second half, but it was abysmal in the first. Elliott woeful.

    in reply to: Awful Starmer action in parliament #281627
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Yep. In terms of politics the people who have been dog whistling about Muslims have been Anderson and Braverman. Starmer made errors in parliament this week, but they all did (SNP and Tories included), and he made no comments which could be perceived as Islamophobia from my view.

    in reply to: Is it really because you are the problem? #281612
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    It must have been hard to cope after her disastrous stint as PM, but I almost feel pity to see this to presumably soothe her ego and make a buck at the same time. She must cringe inside when trying to sell this story to explain her failure.

    in reply to: Awful Starmer action in parliament #281609
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    I see. Opposing mobs, of many different backgrounds, storming MP offices and calling for intifada means you’re an Islamophobe.

    Opposing this is not the same as Farage wanging on about no go zones.

    in reply to: Awful Starmer action in parliament #281606
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    So when Hoyle caves to perceived threats from a mob, it’s Islamophobia?

    in reply to: Awful Starmer action in parliament #281596
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Who encouraged it? How have they encouraged it? What is it that they have done that is connected to Islamophobia?

    in reply to: Awful Starmer action in parliament #281590
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    No-one outside of the harder left cares about what the hard left think is Islamophobic any more when they have been so willing to excuse antisemitism under Corbyn and the continued harassment of MPs over the most pointless parliament squabble in history.

    There has been a worrying rise in antisemitism and anti-Muslim bigotry since Oct 7th. Both are bad, yet those who will fight tooth and nail to avoid toning down antisemitism as genocidal chants are called outside parliament expect credibility as ‘anti-racists’ when they speak of other things. I have no idea how Starmer has enabled anti-Muslim bigotry either.

    in reply to: You have to laugh at the unquestioning nature of press #281513
    SideriteSiderite
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 12, 2014
    Topics: 100

    Some would say that the lack of use of any nuclear weapon post-Nagasaki is vindication of MAD theory.