Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What is the Truth #247755
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    The £250.000 rumoured to be needed was supposedly to pay wages, hardly a credible rumour the days of us paying wages of £250.000 a month are long gone.

    Usually when football clubs become insolvent HMRC is the main creditor. Much of the 250k is probably owed to them.

    in reply to: What is the Truth #247703
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Either that or KVV looking to spend the money he earned from his days as a plasterer*

    *Assumption based on how much the last plasterer I used charged me.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: What is the Truth #247701
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Probably Shell then. Or Royal Dutch Shell as they were called until earlier this year.

    Need to spend a bit of their £8bn profits from the last quarter before Rishi hits them with a windfall tax.

    in reply to: What is the Truth #247686
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Rumours of a sale are a bit like taking a 3-0 lead against Solihull Moors.

    You can’t stop getting a little bit excited even though deep down you know it will end in shit.

    in reply to: What is the Truth #247633
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Sadly the fact we remain overwhelming favourites for relegation at a price way shorter than any of the other incompetent National League sides suggests the bookies know what is coming.

    If the odds were being based on recent results we would be priced in the same ball park as the other 5 or 6 clubs around us.

    The bookies do get it wrong but not very often.

    Administration or liquidation is looming very large. Thanks Peter.

    in reply to: Experienced Non-League Manager needed #247572
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    It’s a much easier game from a few rows back.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: The Heed #247514
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    They stuck with 5 at the back. Wallace at wing back who tried hard but struggled not surprisingly.

    The Heed were decent in midfield but shite upfront so we got away with it.

    Got bullied and out fought for 30 minutes but credit to the team they stepped up physically and made a game of it.

    The handball for the first penalty looked a foot outside the box from my angle but who cares.

    Scruffy, bitty win but the team deserved it.

    Can we just stop handing every team a freebie at the start?

    in reply to: The Heed #247496
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Fair enough to the management team – looking like they are giving 4-4-2 a go.

    What could possibly go wrong?

    Plenty of room for social distancing at Glanford Park tonight.

    in reply to: The Heed #247475
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Hope you are right and not just taking the piss.

    I know its early for doom and gloom but if we don’t win 2 or 3 games before January the we are well and truly trussed.

    This looks the easiest opportunity.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Sad times #247459
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Interesting pictures but probably more to the point is all but one of the clubs are still in business.

    Wimbledon had to reform of course but only Stand Athletic has disappeared permanently. They are the only club I had never heard of and operated at a fairly low level.

    Many of the clubs have shiny new stadiums to play in so their supporters are probably nostalgic but not too disappointed.

    Darlington are an exception in that they got the shiny new stadium but have ended up sharing a rugby ground.

    Hope we still have a club and somewhere to play when our ownership saga reaches its inevitable conclusion.

    in reply to: More TD gems. #247391
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Swann has had some decent managers in place. Some with very decent records both before they got here and after they left.

    Suspect they had the audacity to think they knew more about football than a certain other figure at the club.

    Alexander perhaps the biggest conundrum. Always seems to get sacked when his teams are in a reasonable position. Oh to be the position he left us in.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Waiting for the Swann statement #247379
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Probably already knows where he is going Cass.

    in reply to: Waiting for the Swann statement #247376
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    I think we have 4 areas where we don’t have the right calibre of player cover.

    We don’t have a goalkeeper suitable for the situation the team has been in for the last 4 seasons. It is OK for comfortably mid table sides to risk a young inexperienced keeper but not if you are continually at the bottom of the league.

    We don’t have a credible centre half to fill in injuries or suspensions for the two we have – that assumes giving Taft the benefit of the doubt.

    We have no forwards to cover Nuttall and Lavery. We also have to accept Lavery has done nothing since scoring a very good goal on his debut.

    We have no wide players which means we rarely get decent supply to the front 2 and pretty much stops us playing 4-4-2 which at this level gives struggling sides the best chance of a clean sheet.

    We have 3 left backs although in the cup game we decided to play neither of them in that position.

    In midfield we have Butterfield supported by about 10 others none of whom have shown yet that they are good enough.

    When Nuttall and Apter go in January I cannot see us getting another point let alone a win or a clean sheet.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Southend #247275
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Embarrassing, sad and so so predictable.

    More points in the prediction league for that result than the team have managed all season.

    in reply to: Southend #247255
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Nuttall up front on his own.

    Bizarre tactics to try and Wilcox a 0-0 with our defensive record.

    in reply to: Southend #247224
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    I think I’m right in saying Daws has played 4 at the back twice and they are the 2 games he has lost.

    I think we play 3 centre backs often because we don’t have the confidence in any 2 of them.

    I would prefer to stick with 2 and put a defensive midfield in front of them. Rowe, Pugh or Gallimore could do that job.

    Always feel playing 3 at our level allows them to shirk responsibility for covering their man. I’m convinced we allow more free headers in the box when we play with 3.

    in reply to: Podcasts #246986
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Are you referring to it’s more sporadic frequency of appearances NI?

    If you are I feel you are being a bit harsh as it still appears far more frequently than Jordan.

    I don’t blame the lads for not doing one every week. There is only so many things you can say about the shitshow that is our once proud club.

    Perhaps we could invite a music critic and a food critic on to rate the pre-match experience. More interesting than the football these days.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Expectations #246985
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Back in the juniors.

    in reply to: South Shields #246852
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    You have to question the set up of the team for this one.

    3 left backs in the squad. Let’s play 1 at centre back and have the other 2 on the bench says Tony. Who plays left back says Nelse.

    A right back of course says Tony. It will confuse the opposition.

    Which centre back is looking after their centre forward at set pieces asks Nelse. He got a hat trick in the last round so might be a bit handy.

    Which midfield player is worst at defending asked Tony. Why Beeston of course replied Nelse.

    He will do then says Tony.

    Who is taking our set pieces then given Rob and Jacob cannot play inquired Nelse.

    Doesn’t really matter said Tony. The only other player in the club that can deliver a dead ball is Mason but he’s on the bench. The rest are all terrible so you pick. OK boss we can get Whitehouse to do it. He is crap at it but we never score from them anyway.

    in reply to: South Shields #246774
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    It is a very deep barrel that we are scraping the bottom of.

    Still, maximum points in the prediction league for that one.

    Don’t even feel frustrated or angry anymore. Just resignation and sadness.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: 3-5-2? #246488
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    They threw caution to the wind at half time and defenders pushed forward into midfield. Beeston and Butterfield understandably chasing shadows.

    Made worse by our wing backs becoming full backs. We were pretty much 5-2-3 for that first 20 minutes of the first half.

    Made worse by the isolated front 3 switching to half hearted mode in their closing down.

    All these things were blatantly obvious from the stands but we were desperately hanging on to a point by the time Pugh was moved into midfield to help stem the flow.

    It was obvious Lavery was gone physically 10 minutes into the second half but took another 20 minutes to get Wilson on.

    The players got the blame from Tony for the second half but I think he and Nelson have to shoulder some of the responsibility.

    They made the right kind of changes but much too late.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: That there takeover? #246414
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    I agree with Sanfran here.

    In fact I will probably only believe a sale has happened when the new ownership confirms it.

    in reply to: That there takeover? #246412
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Not often I come to Mr Swann’s defence but he was promised the land free or virtually free by the council and the first developer. I don’t know if there was a contract in place (you would hope so) but the developer went bust. The council then found a new developer and they then jointly expected Swann to pay for the land and a big chunk of supporting infrastructure.

    This made the new stadium financially not viable. That series of events is the only thing in the last 9 years that I have sympathy with Swann for.

    Probably explains why the council leader does not get a Christmas card from the Swann’s.

    Also to be fair your design and detailed plans have to be presented as part of a planning application so those costs were inevitable.

    I want new owners as much as anyone and in my opinion the club has been run spectacularly badly for 5 years.

    I hold Mr Swann totally responsible for that and the current nightmare situation the club is in but it seems to me he was not responsible for the failure of the new stadium project.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: That there takeover? #246308
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    He has not breached anything. He has not told anyone who made the offer or what the offer was.

    He simply said a group had made an acceptable offer, passed the FPP test but could not provide proof of required funding.

    in reply to: That there takeover? #246299
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    The family must have stopped reading the board otherwise your last post would have been agreed with by now.

    in reply to: That there takeover? #246298
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    I would imagine Mr Swann is covered by some restrictions in such agreements should they exist.

    I am not claiming to have inside knowledge of the potential sale of the club. I am just giving possibilities based on standard practice during company sales.

    in reply to: That there takeover? #246290
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Suspect any parties that have declared an interest will have had to sign confidentiality agreements or NDA’s.

    The truth will out once liquidation or a sale is confirmed.

    in reply to: That there takeover? #246272
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    You are deciding to believe one sides version of that event then?

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: That there takeover? #246267
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    There have been 4 or 5 interested groups so far depending who you believe. I think Swann has referenced 4 of them but of course that is no guarantee of truth.

    For a club hanging on at the arse end of full time professional football that seems a high number and definitely suggests the interest is certainly there.

    It is only my opinion but it also suggests the asking price is too high or that the strings attached too onerous.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Oldham #246120
    mkironMK Iron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: December 23, 2013
    Topics: 50

    Won on our last 4 visits according to IronStats. Never won away anywhere 5 times in a row.

    There’s a first time for everything boys.