[IronIronIron]

mistertonmick wrote:

Port Vale on target 3 goals 1
Newport on target 4 goals 1
Crawley on target 1 goals 0
Carlisle on target 2 goals 1
Tranmere on target 1 goals 0

Certainly going backwards on attempts, so average of 2 shots on target per game, and averaging 0.6 goals a game, so it’s riveting stuff in our opponents half and something needs changing, and it’s not all the forwards fault, playing without wingers we aren’t getting enough crosses in for the big lads and our so called wing backs rarely go over the halfway line, still trying to work out what position Gillihead is playing in this formation, also why did we change Taylor and Vincent positions because we were woeful second half, also Rory was more back to form with that punch for the second goal.

Mick, you are being a little unfair. Your stats do not include attempts that were blocked. Many of these would have been on target.

That said, we are still very poor.

[IronIronIron]

And a ban for fansy, for foul & abusive language

[IronIronIron]

He will be very happy not to be memtioned on here at the moment. There only seem to be negative comments.

[IronIronIron]

It’s the managers fault that he can’t put in consistent performances?

How do others manage it?

He can be excellent but, as Les highlighted, over all he is below average.

[IronIronIron]

He’s had 4 clubs & more managers. Perhaps he isn’t good enough. He certainly isn’t on a regular basis.

[IronIronIron]

Managed relegation 🤣🤣🤣.

Here we go again!!

[IronIronIron]

Anonymous wrote:

He could think that, but I am struggling to see why he would think that given the performances we’ve seen so far in those positions, especially with Eisa. Gillead has played alright, but I still feel he’s more suited to the wing.

Also, this does give some evidence against the common denominator of the strategy/team being totally controlled by the chairman. You’d think if Swann was the one calling the shots he’d have had continuity between managers in term of playing position. However, Cox is playing Eisa and Gillead in different positions. This gives some suggestion that this is a managerial decision.

There is no proof whatsoever that Swann has been choosing the team. Where he is guilty is in choosing poor managers.

[IronIronIron]

Top half.

[IronIronIron]

So you are having a go at the club when you don’t even know if Turan has gone back to Germany?

Do you expect a report on every single squad member whenever they do something?

God knows what you’ll be like when the season proper starts.

[IronIronIron]

Northumbiron wrote:

Pat O’Cake wrote:

A convicted domestic abuser? No thank you.

Worked for Peterborough!

Should we not consider anyone who has ever had a criminal record? If they have served their time then surely they should be welcomed back in to the fold.

Does this extend to players as well? What about staff? Fans? Where does this all end……..

[IronIronIron]

Smudger wrote:

Have to wait and see

Why? If you know, just tell us.

I hate all this “in the know” crap.

[IronIronIron]

Northumbiron wrote:

So that’s “officially licensed partner” then. Not “money grabbing website”.

Got you order in III?

It’s on its way NI. I do hope that the Club get a resonable chunk from the selling price – it is quite expensive.

[IronIronIron]

At £11.99 for a facemask the Club could make a small fortune. I’d happiy buy one or two from the club, but not from some money grabbing website.

Also, Bishops Finger is correct, they should be licensed to use the logo. someone needs to follow this up as we could be owed a good few quid.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Sanfran49

[Author]

Posts