Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Losing Hope…. #239733
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    How old is the Dalai Lama now? Can he play in a striker role? We need a few leaders on the pitch, even spirtitual ones.

    in reply to: The Good Old Days #239722
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    ‘If Liverpool can win all they did with just one player on the bench – then I’m sure we can get by with reduced numbers.’

    Well that made me laugh!

    in reply to: Oldham #239684
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Already made a number of decent experienced signings too. Reckon they’ll be right up there next season

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Keith’s plan #239671
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    What next? Under 5s?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Keith’s plan #239663
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Given volatile outside and inside forces, that had to be one very loose and fluid plan.

    in reply to: Losing Hope…. #239645
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Squad of 15 according to the OWS – though I notice no one has bothered to add our single, solitary, sole summer signing to the list!

    https://www.scunthorpe-united.co.uk/teams/first-team2/

    Wait, what? They’re supposed to add the three trialists. UTI99’s included them in his list. Maybe the site needs updating?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239608
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    ‘hey,all fools together,will prefer to believe false words rather than the truth(that scripture reveals).’

    As far as I can see, they prefer to believe fiction. I don’t have a problem with that, but I do when they try and claim it as truth and demand that modern societies base laws on it.

    in reply to: Losing Hope…. #239597
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    ‘Relax’?! Not being funny UTI99, but you’ve been trusting in Swann for years now and look where the club is. How can anyone relax?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: NATIONAL LEAGUE CHAMPIONS 2022/23…. #239588
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    On the basis they impress? Clutching at straws there adding them when you don’t know if they’ll be signed. Some serious gaps and lack of seasoned heads even if they do. State of the forward line! Needs bolstering big time.

    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239561
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Don’t believe that myself, apart from two trolls who were clearly the same person.

    What I do find intriguing is that two self identified Christians with deep right wing leanings on here have stated they’ve met in person before, and another self identified Christian who promoted UKIP / Brexit on here recently said on the footy side that he’d met another notorious right winger who used to post on here in person too.

    Given the Bru connection, I can well imagine some their conversations were around the need to ally on here. The biggest irony being of course that a handful of posters with left leaning / liberal tendencies were accused of being in some fictional cabal called the FORUM 6, despite never once meeting each or having separate direct mail conversations, as far as I know anyway.

    Just goes to show doesn’t it!

    in reply to: Potential signings? #239558
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Of course it is, some of our fans have been clinging onto our over achievements for the last decade.

    Clinging on to over achievements is no excuse for the state the club is in now so that’s pretty irrelevant.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Potential signings? #239557
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Boreham Wood did well and had a great cup run, Dagenham very close to a play off spot and Wealdstone and Maidenhead held there own – I was more trying to make the point that lower attendances and lower budgets don’t always necessarily mean its an excuse to not do well /sign decent players which I fear for you Swann is using it as

    Yes, and a very good point it is Rich. Unlike the post directly above.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Potential signings? #239544
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Good to see footage of Keith leading the under 18s training session yesterday. When does the first team start back? And can we expect yet another new signing today?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: National League Drinking Lounge #239540
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    You had more faith than I did then.

    in reply to: Potential signings? #239539
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Which teams are doing very well on 1k average attendance Rich?

    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239530
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Only an anti-arbortionist could have written that hypothetical script.

    ’emotional card being played regarding rape/incest’. Lol, what are you saying? Rape and incest isn’t emotional? It gets worse!

    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239523
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    You want something barbaric / evil? Look no further than this widely reported fact:

    ‘While all of these laws make exceptions for the life of the mother, most do not include exceptions for rape and incest.’

    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239522
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    An up to date article from the New York Times with a list and map showing those States where abortion is now banned, planned to be or could well be soon:

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/us/abortion-laws-roe-v-wade.html

    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239521
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    I’m aware that some people may not want to open that Washington Post link, so here’s a key extract just so people are clear I’m not as daft as I appear (despite efforts to undermine):

    ‘First, 13 states with “trigger bans,” designed to take effect if Roe were struck down, will prohibit abortion within 30 days. At least eight states banned the procedure the day the ruling was released. Several others with antiabortion laws blocked by the courts are expected to act, with lawmakers moving to activate their dormant legislation. A handful of states also have pre-Roe abortion bans that could be reactivated, and others moved immediately to introduce new legislation.’

    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239520
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Maybe imagined it, I swear I’ve read numerous times, posters on Bru of a certain persuasion having publicly met each other before? Could be evil forces playing with my mind tank of course

    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239518
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Have to say JI, I found your last post to be employing tactics uncharacteristic of your usual dignified nature. Hey ho, no one’s perfect, least of all me! Glad you ‘stumbled upon’ the non footy side again. I can well imagine posters of a certain persuasion getting a little heads up from their allies, but seriously doubt that has happened on Bru. It’s not like any of us have ever met each other is it?

    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239515
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    What’s that JI, have I understood what’s happened in the US? Yes I have. But have you my friend?

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/06/24/abortion-state-laws-criminalization-roe/

    Do you dispute what the Washington Post is saying here?

    Your last point is correct though and, as I’ve previously said, I’m thankful my family aren’t based in one of those States.

    in reply to: National League Drinking Lounge #239503
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    So like, never then? 🤣

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239502
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Well, Bpg and JI can rejoice àll they like, it’s not happening in the UK any time soon and hopefully not in my lifetime. Now that is worthy of rejoicing. And you know what? If religious right wingers can’t handle living in a country that upholds a woman’s right to choose, that welcomes same sex marriage, etc, maybe consider relocating to one of those US states where you might feel less threatened? It’s a serious proposition, plenty more Trumpian rulings to come now he’s rigged the Supreme Court. ‘Ooh heaven is a place on earth…’

    in reply to: National League Drinking Lounge #239495
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    We’ve got enough going on ere Ben with our doom and despair on the footy side and religious/Christianity run ins on the non-footy side! Peace ✌

    in reply to: National League Drinking Lounge #239490
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Only joking. I’m sure it’s a reet hoot

    in reply to: National League Drinking Lounge #239489
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    BANTZ?? Feck off mate! Is that BANTZ enough for ya?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Welcome back. #239480
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Yes, welcome back everyone to Bru’s version of Gillead; based on the anti-arbortionists comments on the other thread. Welcome back to the place where you are deemed barbaric and evil if you felt an abortion was the best course of action. Welcome one and all. Or maybe not?

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Roe v Wade #239474
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Not sure why you’re surprised Bpg has wheeled in Holocaust comparisons Siderite. It’s on par with a lot of his other notions around Covid restrictions, ‘great re-set’, Marxist’s taking over the world, etc.

    in reply to: Potential signings? #239447
    Deereyme66Deereyme66
    Moderator
    Offline
    Registered On: May 8, 2017
    Topics: 186

    Maybe you could try and take Shaun Pearson on loan,he will be 6th choice cb for us but is more than good enough for NL him and Boyce would be a solid CB pairing. Whitehouse is a decent player to if you are in for him

    Are you taking the piss now Rich? 6th choice???? Cheers mate! And everyone knows about Paul Whitehouse’s dodgy ticker. No thanks!