Forum Replies Created

  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Gainsborough groundshare #273275
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Hmm, bluffing doesn’t equal negotiating tactic IMO. Playing Poker hasn’t worked so far has it?

    It may not be ethical, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen…

    https://academic.oup.com/book/5430/chapter-abstract/148281756?redirectedFrom=fulltext

    in reply to: Gainsborough groundshare #273271
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Call swanns bluff into thinking we no longer want and need the ground so he drops his asking price.

    As a negotiating tactic, there’s a very, very slim chance that this might work. But not if you announce it publicly as what you’re doing….

    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    If the trust have £800,000 TJO that should be enough for a down payment for the ground my £1000 would soon follow.

    Just to clarify, Scunthorpe United FC Community Sports and Education Trust, which has £897000 funds carried forward in its most recent accounts, is not The Iron Trust.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Radio Humberside #270969
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    (reply to lesgeo)

    Internet commentary available on BBC Humberside website isn’t usually as far behind ‘live’ as the stream. Start listening, freeze/pause when they mention kick off, then press play when the stream shows the kick off.

    Worked flawlessly for me on Monday, but I have to admit I didn’t think of it until half time!

    in reply to: Car Park #265058
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    they sold 1899 club memberships didn’t they, wasn’t that a share in a ground they hadn’t bought?

    Technically not; spending £1899 bought you the option to spend another £1 to buy a share in the company that would own the ground. Amongst other fantastic benefits.

    in reply to: Successful season #261477
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Cameron Burgess a regular in the Ipswich L1 promotion side!

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Season tickets #257841
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    “The Price of Football” podcast raised this a couple of weeks ago with a representative from Lincoln City who seemed unhappy that their ‘card merchant’ had done the same to them just as they were launching their Early Bird tickets despite no prior issues with chargebacks, but had been told it was on the basis of a risk assessment.

    Alternatives he investigated had either wanted substantial bonds to be paid or would withhold payments and distribute funds as games were played. He pointed out that the entire reason for Early Bird deals is to get cash flow for the summer when there are few other inflows, and that if you have to wait until August for payments to start, it rather defeats the object…

    in reply to: Explosive stuff Ernest #251967
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4
    in reply to: Administration #244956
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    In the most recent accounts the club has negative total equity of £2.3m, whereas in the accounts to June 2013 total equity was positive at £2.8m.

    I’m struggling to see how that’s a better financial position, but then Peter is cleverer than all of us, as evidenced by his recent refusal to answer questions during the Humberside interview on the basis that his interviewer wouldn’t be capable of understanding, so doubtless he’s right..

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Administration #244906
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Thankhand was a spectacularly poor idea, as evidenced by its lack of success.

    It was particularly embarrassing that Swann associated the club with it.

    If there was any value to it, and the rights were owned by the club, its value wouldn’t be reflected in the accounts, as you can only include the value of intangible assets (including trademarks, copyright etc,) if you’ve paid for them.

    Equally, I suspect that any upside would be to Swann’s benefit, rather than the club’s, and that despite using the club website to promote the idea, there was little chance that the club would benefit.

    I was being sarcastic in reference to earlier comments about the lack of club assets, at the same time as remembering one of our great leader’s scintillating business ideas. Has anyone actually told him what a “Spyglass” is, and so why his James Bond-themed bar in Blackpool is so ridiculously irrelevantly named??

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Administration #244880
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Surely only the accounting convention precluding valuation of internally developed intellectual property is preventing the innovative Thankhand (TM) from being valued at millions in the club accounts?

    https://www.scunthorpe-united.co.uk/news/2020/april/thankhand/

    Unless Peter was only using the club to promote yet another stunningly successful business idea…

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: HOW MUCH LONGER #243197
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    None.

    Interesting that the top 3 transfers from the National League all went to Peterborough

    Lee Tomlin from Rushden and Diamonds to Peterborough in 2010 for £225,000

    Shaun Brisley from Macclesfield to Peterborough in 2012 for £350,000

    Jack Taylor from Barnet to Peterborough for £500k in 2020.

    Wasn’t Vardy to Leicester considered the record for non-league? On a technicality, Fleetwood had been promoted to the league before he signed for Leicester, but he left well before the new season started.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Ernie rumbled #242501
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    If only I’d donated my shares to the Swann family as Peter requested nine years ago. He said it would make it easier for him to sell if I did that.

    I blame myself.

    Sorry.

    in reply to: Highlights? #242308
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Also worth noting that the BT roundup appears on YouTube for those without subscriptions. Hopefully the link works…

    3 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Tyrece Sinclair #237205
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Not many appearances in the last month or so though. Presumably unable to play against Mansfield, but would guess either not especially rated by Hill, or one who possibly “feared injury”…

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Could anyone at the club explain this? #237063
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Maybe she didn’t know?

    It’s a Coolsilk asset now, not SUFCs, so she may not have been informed.

    That would have involved courtesy, common decency etc.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: The Ground #235756
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    If you think Swann has improved the assets of Coolsilk, check the most recent accounts on the Companies House website.

    Coolsilk Property and Investment Ltd.’s net assets down from £49.6m to £20.0m. in the year to June 2021.

    in reply to: The Ground #232123
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Swann was shown to be a mouthy pratt there, and a braggart here.
    not much difference.
    He never took their ground though.

    [/quote]

    He tried to relocate Trinity, but the Blues Club (supporters’ association) owned (own) the pitch and wouldn’t go along with his plans, so he left the club ‘debt free’ but with an unsustainable wage bill that arguably ultimately led to the first relegation in their 100+ year history.

    A similar arrangement exists at Chelsea, where Abramovich owns everything at Stamford Bridge except the pitch, which is owned by 13000+ fans via the Chelsea Pitch Owners’ plc.

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Keith Hill #231578
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    The 115% wages to turnover in the 2014 accounts was only the start; subsequent years were 156.7%, 132.1%, 131.6%, 137.0%, 143.0% before the funds dried up to 77.8% in 2020.

    If I had to choose between the ‘astute businessman’ and the ‘hobbyist’, I know who I think has been the better custodian of the club over the years…

    in reply to: Cods forum vs this one. #230341
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    £12m wasted? That’s just the loan.

    There’s also been the best part of £8m in additional share issues since Swann arrived, and the profit and loss account has gone from £111,938 in the 2012 accounts (the last before share issues started) to -£19,565,559 in 2020 (the most recent available).

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Swann statement – opinions. #230276
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    I can’t understand why he can’t use the ground as security on a loan to pay off the EFL loan.

    Didn’t he tell us the reason he transferred it out of the club was because banks wouldn’t lend to football clubs? Surely now is an opportune time to benefit from this masterstroke?

    Yes, it would be risky. But so was the reckless overspending over a number of years that has brought us here…

    Presumably the difference is who would be taking the risk and suffering the potential consequences? The previous losses haven’t worked out too badly for some given the ‘transfer of assets’, but there aren’t many assets left to compensate for misjudgment now…

    4 users thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Swann and Gainsborough Trinity #215233
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    I always found it curious that a man who told us he “wasn’t a property developer” should buy his shares via ‘Coolsilk Property and Investment Ltd.’, particularly after events at Gainsborough, and that his first communication with shareholders was to ask them to donate their shares so that he’d be able to sell the club more easily in future.

    His second move was to abolish AGMs, making it all the more strange that he should now not only want to reinstate them, but to have additional meetings with smaller shareholder groups. It’s hard to believe he’s really that interested in what anyone has to say given past events…

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Swann and Gainsborough Trinity #215221
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Surely coincidental that he also seemed to lose interest there when a proposed property deal didn’t go the way he wanted it to…

    https://www.worksopguardian.co.uk/sport/football/swann-i-have-no-choice-but-to-walk-away-2347020

    in reply to: IRON BAR #212355
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    If only we were run by a ‘developer’ who aspires to match “anything London has to offer” when running a bar.

    Perhaps if the Scunthorpe demographic included a sizeable number of wannabe James Bonds we might be the beneficiaries of such quality surroundings….

    https://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/business/spy-themed-bar-to-open-in-ps30m-blackpool-sands-resort-hotel-3349860

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    in reply to: Poll #205934
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    If he owned 100% of the club, it would be true that he’d “sold the ground to himself”, but he doesn’t. If the value of the land/property is worth more than £11m (I’ve no idea), he’s potentially in breach of his fiduciary duty to the remaining shareholders.

    in reply to: Plain stupidity #196485
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    The club are currently in discussions with the local Safety Advisory Group with a view to opening the restaurant for the Colchester match on Friday. Same sort of arrangement, with the blinds closed throughout.

    in reply to: Out of money in November #195234
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    The “well run club” has declared losses of c. £3.6m in each of the last two annual reports.

    Given the current rules on playing budgets, which would mean far lower ongoing losses, the only reason the club would be in danger is if the owner had decided not to sustain such losses in future, which he is perfectly entitled to do, much as we might not like it.

    Of course, as a negotiating tactic, it wouldn’t be the brightest idea to suggest that the club is flush and doesn’t need grants…

    in reply to: What a Great Site Sponsor #194700
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    P.S. I note, belatedly, that the sponsorship is actually specifically for the podcast, rather than for the website itself. Has the podcast ever even hinted at any form of anti-royalist sentiment? I suspect not, but am happy to be corrected.

    in reply to: What a Great Site Sponsor #194699
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    Genuinely struggling to see your problem here Bucksiron.

    Website struggling for cash
    Sponsor offers cash
    Gratefully accepted
    Problem solved

    It almost seems like you’re looking for an argument when there’s no need for one.

    If anything, your concern should be for the sponsor who’s got into bed with an organisation who may not entirely share its core values, assuming of course that anyone who does business with the royals must be ardent royalists rather than cynical capitalists who see the potential value of an association with royalty.

    Perhaps you could offer them your valuable PR services, just on the off chance that the odd potential buyer of a granite worktop might be influenced by the opinions of a few who might hold left-of-centre views on the non-football section of a website the manufacturer sponsors.

    (posters who, of course, don’t “run” the website, fundamentally undermining your initial accusation of hypocrisy)

    in reply to: Ifollow #194575
    SouthYorksIronSouthYorksIron
    Participant
    Offline
    Registered On: May 26, 2017
    Topics: 4

    If you have the app installed on an iPad or similar, the game should already appear under “upcoming matches”; just click on this before kick off – for the Port Vale game it started a while before kick off, with a live stream of the pitch at GP accompanied by the Humberside commentary.

    If using the internet rather than the app, pre-match videos should appear without the ‘subscribe’ locked icon alongside if payment has gone through successfully e.g. the Cox interview about the Newport game has no such icon when I’m logged in (name appears on the RHS of the blue bar at the top of the screen); the match should appear here or elsewhere inside the iFollow part of the website as long as you’re logged in.

    Apologies for my uncertainty about the internet option; I’ve only used this once for the Vale game, and I used the app for that…