[64]

lol, I saw them,others saw them.It happened and nobody wants to answer my question.My work colleague who stands at that side of the ground also saw people throwing punches. My neighbour is a steward and confirmed it too. I have no reason or need to lie to make a point have I?
I agree with the protestors and have been boycotting SUFC for years as have others, I merely don’t like people hitting low paid workers .

[64]

has anyone else lost this thread ages ago?

1 user thanked author for this post.

Northumbiron

[64]

No double standard by me,I wouldn’t have deleted for those words

[64]

Yeah I just looked at the job titles below directors

[64]

it’s quite a staff isn’t it?

[64]

Awaywego wrote:

And why should we take your word over it, wasn’t it you who Swann challenged about the truth.

No! he never suggested I lied,his solicitor suggested I’d made out he was a bad businessman because I used the phrase “when the club was run properly”

I cannot post here the exact wording as it’s legally privileged so it says on top of the Pinder Reaux headed letter

[64]

Heath wrote:

“Mind you I have a whole list of what many regard as classics that have me reaching for the ear-plugs”.

Having spent most of the mid 70s and 80s in the pub, I also have a long list of jukebox “classics” that were constantly played by a range of people (most of them tossers).

So a life long aversion to anything by Meat Loaf, Queen, Guns & Roses, Lynard Skynrd, Boston, Chicago, the Final Countdown, thin lizzy (ok but not the same song 10 times every night), smoke on the water, stairway to heaven, the peter Frampton song and layla.

I’ll stop there as I’m sure you get the idea.

I hate the eagles for that reason,where I worked two blokes had the same tape on theirs days for the machine we all chipped in for that and REO speedwagon

[64]

Prat and dick wad,?What else was in it? I know somebody mentioning ladles genitals was removed by me

[64]

Anti trans activists?

[64]

[64]

I saw them and my friend pointed it out too . My question is,is a protest peaceful if puncheas are being thrown?
“if it’s not on social media it didn’t happen” lol

[64]

It passed with something like 80% in parliament didn’t it?

[64]

Nobody is saying protesting is illegal,running on a football pitch is.
,Olly has not written the full story ,he’s a t*** for that in my opinion

[64]

They started pushing ? For no reason?

[64]

Arsenene Wenger the iron fan

[64]

I suppose the ultimate Irony is that it was pressure from the Iron trust that got rid of the Robocop stewards and left us with the soft targets on minimum wage

[64]

IT happened ,there were quite a few throwing them .It’s undeniable

[64]

yes

[64]

I took the trouble to find out,

A the trust cannot condonme law breaking,so siding with pitch invasion is not an option.
They also understand fans feeling so are not willing to demonise tham , it;s the devil and deep blue sea .I am just a member so can say I support protests .
This Olly has clearly not told the whole tone of the conversation, but I bet he knows that the trust will be asking the club to tone down their rhetoric aimed at protesters ,but that doesn’t get you riled up to say that so he omitted it no doubt. I think he’s a shit stirrer probably after a job in a tabloid.
His one tweet has done a lot of damage to the trust that is struggling to keep to it legal obligations while hating Swann.
PS who got your precious corner opened? look what happened there

[64]

I doubt he said that,
I notice that the text above is not from the trust it’s a copy and paste . I’d say Olly Turner has just put the juicy bit to cause trouble and the bit about making a statement and opinion after meeting the club is left out .

[64]

if you were there you must have seen it

[64]

I doubt that will be the outcome,fans are divided as to whether the protests do more harm than good .If the whole fan base is divided then it follows that the trust membership is. They definitely do not support Swann ,this is clearly an issue that they cannot win on
I do find it funny that people who abused me no too long ago for warning about this outcome are now all over it moaning about people not protesting how the want them to.
swann has stopped talking to the trust and frozen them out in the past and they have had a few run ins with him ,sometimes face to face, not shouting from a stadium terrace.
Running around the pitch after the Horse has bolted won’t solve much but you have to admire the passion.
people like awaywego seem to want to criticise anyone if it takes away from his support of “Swanny”

1 user thanked author for this post.

CMC

[64]

can you call it a peaceful protest when punches were raining down on stewards at the beginning?

[64]

Its to stop the original application running out apparently,just a formality

1 user thanked author for this post.

Siderite

[64]

stewards wwre as half arsed as the demonstrators, it was a perfect metaphor for the whole afternoon

2 users thanked author for this post.

North Lincolnshire Irons, Cliff Byrne's Right Peg

[64]

“from twitter!”?

[64]

Don’t be ridiculous.if your favourite supermarket doens’t pay it’s paye do you pay it? It’s a private business that plays on loyalty when it wants it .We’ve been told we’re not needed so paying for their mistakes is not on
As the Americans say, no taxation without representation and any trust led has to involve a quid pro quo.

2 users thanked author for this post.

bartonscorpion, Awaywego

[64]

yeah but only the trust get flak.
This is odd ,if I am reading it right,it’s for an 11k stadium?

[64]

Its not our” tax bill at all .Neither you or I own any part of SUFC.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Awaywego

[64]

We shouldn’t pay their tax bill for nothing in return

[Author]

Posts