[64]

Glad you don’t trying saying I’m wrong, you’d look silly

[64]

64 wrote:

Hopefully we get promoted and he rides off into the sunset a winner. He’s not the guy to take this club anywhere, the players are dictating things I reckon and when their skill isn’t enough they’re not getting enough direction to change games in my opinion

1st bit looking less likely

[64]

I’ve not changed my mind about him

1 user thanked author for this post.

IronIronIron

[64]

It’s on , it’s going to be more regular from now on

1 user thanked author for this post.

Iron-awe

[64]

We’re getting one together, I think it’s been a busy period but there’s a lot to unravel. The end of Hilton , new regime and very important trust elections . There’s also football

[64]

They sold them for a fiver

[64]

dunno,ask the trust

[64]

I can’t see this word without saying in my mind “vanarama” in the style of Viv from the young ones when Bananarama were on

[64]

it’s how we should be run,no bad thing.Being a buying club nearly killed us and we’re not safe yet

2 users thanked author for this post.

Ferrite, Rene Artois

[64]

your sort do like a good cheat

1 user thanked author for this post.

Awaywego

[64]

I’d kick him out of the club for that ,disgusting cheating. I really hate it in our own players so much

[64]

I think he’s ok, that said he shouldn’t given free reign.He also didn’t need abuse.
He did take part in demonising Iron fans though and Im not sure he has apologised .

1 user thanked author for this post.

SODIron

[64]

Not naughty or the idea not for you?

[64]

I preferred the style of play without them.

[64]

Hence the frustration with our tactics,Cliffy

[64]

was there anything that came out?

[64]

I think their biggest failing is being carbon copies of the people we’ve seen for years, it was a hope that they would be far better and bring some new language into commentary and no more “he’s gone and done him ” etc

[64]

he was there to put several easy chances in and fluffed them, we would have strolled it but for his finishing, even a change in tactics that should have suited him left him mostly behind play and when he lost the ball he gave it up far too often.
I had to gave him the benefit of doubt due to our pub manager’s tactics of wingers coming in and crowding out the midfield and he wasn’t really the guy to play through , today, due to players being out, our wingers used width and got in behind and he still fluffed his lines. Elliot looked more accomplished in possession and given the time Shitehall has he’d produce more for the team in my opinion.
If the manger wants his players to come in from the wings then we need better in there than we have, Butterfield especially won’t get the touches he needs if we go up ,he’ll get swamped .Beestin needed a better second half and got it.

[64]

Doesn’t he like football?

[64]

https://x.com/thewronguns2?t=7FMeOVBLajQR1o6YL9Uupg&s=09

[64]

mistertonmick wrote:

so he was working on it

Nobody said that did they?

[64]

mistertonmick wrote:

it certainly was on Laptop, but could get it om Android Tablet at times, Matt must have been working on it.

why must he?
The server went down and it took them a while to sort

[64]

if you send people out with murder in mind they kill everyone,even their own .Hence the white flag murders of Israeli citizens.It wasn’t an accident,they thought they were Muslims

[64]

not with my TV licence fee

[64]

Just Iron wrote:

There’s no chance of you just letting it go, 64? Bygones be bygones and all that? Sometimes that’s the best way …

absolutely not if I was talking about calling someone a Knob or such like then maybe it’s time but Doxxing especially is a vicious form of intimidation designed to scare people

[64]

Initial response I would have liked would have been some acknowledgement of things happening in the past and that from now on there is a code of conduct in place. I would have also like to see ,but never expected, even if not publicly said,some reluctance to use those that took part in such behaviour but as we saw with Simon’s little coffee club that wasn’t ever to be

1 user thanked author for this post.

Ferrite

[64]

They went into it in good faith and most importantly a wish to be part of SUFC ,I personally think it looked a bad deal and reckon they don’t need their noses rubbing in it,they’re just good fans

9 users thanked author for this post.

inspector, open hearth iron, bartonscorpion, Cliff Byrne's Right Peg, Ferrite, Just Iron, GTiron, BigLeftToe, Sanfran49

[64]

it’s extremely relevant if the abusive person is well known on social media ,has behaved appallingly for months and is then apparently befriended and even after the truth all came out we never got any remorse and it’s still continuing ,then I reckon my point stands

[64]

The friends of Directors were at it (doxxing) and threats again today

[64]

Can I ask how much you put in,was it the full £1899,or was there an instalment option? ,who did you make payment to?

[Author]

Posts