[Deereyme66]

Is there a ‘Moron of the Year’ award?

[Deereyme66]

64 wrote:

Bucks is targetted ,at one point quite badly. I tried to do something about but he asked me to not

You said ‘you are evil’ of him the other day. You personally blamed him for ambulance waiting times the other day. You don’t find that hypocritical? You are one of a number of moderators on here. You set a bad example in my opinion. You don’t appear to moderate, so much as make your own rules up as you go along. If you really wanted to do something about some supposed ‘feeding frenzy’ you should probably start by not blaming him personally for the NHS crisis and calling him ‘evil’. Get a grip or allow others to continue keeping things orderly and civilised. Just my opinion.

3 users thanked author for this post.

Iron-awe, Heath, Siderite

[Deereyme66]

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/hard-left

[Deereyme66]

‘Your idiotic post shows you claim to be wise but you are a fool ( the words in Romans chapter 1.)’

Didn’t realise the Internet was so old.

[Deereyme66]

Sorry, are people only acceptable to the hard left and hard right allowed entry?

[Deereyme66]

Keir Starmer

[Deereyme66]

‘Of course the Tories aren’t blameless but neither are the likes of Mick Lynch whose union has played a big part in depriving small businesses of customers at the very time they most need them, i.e. Christmas.’

The government need to do more to find the funds better meet the workers reasonable demands. It can do more, but wait where’s that magic money tree gone?! Mysteriously it’s vanished again. It’s not the unions that have deprived small businesses, it’s the government refusing to be reasonable that’s having a knock on effect.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Heath

[Deereyme66]

‘Ah yes, a joke. Hilarious. Just how crass can you get.’

Satire, and pretty good in the first and later case. IMO.

1 user thanked author for this post.

TwoWrights

[Deereyme66]

What a tragic modern society

[Deereyme66]

‘to help bring about a society they would like. Do you have evidence to prove that wasn’t part of his thinking?

[Deereyme66]

I haven’t seen the programme but I’d be very surprised if he formed an ambition to be an MP, just for the sake of being an MP. But you wouldn’t want to credit him with his ambition being anything more than that would you. Thing is, even if anyone presented evidence to you to demonstrate that this ambition was more than those simple terms, you’d just say he’s a liar, so it’s pointless arguing the case with you.

[Deereyme66]

‘he went to parliament as a kid and decided that day he wanted to be an MP,showing that his only ambiton ever was personal.’

Lol, when is an ambition not personal?!

[Deereyme66]

64 wrote:

what are you on about?,this “archived” came up today when I went on the BBC. It appears you don’t like your lying backstabbers pals being critiqued

‘Lying backstabbers pals’. Wow, that’s really deep. If you’re going to ‘critique’ Starmer and the current Party set up you could make an effort.

[Deereyme66]

64 wrote:

If I mention Blair ,it’s whatabouery ,even if I don’t follow on a thread with it to try and deflect? That makes no sense.

My opinion. If it makes no sense to you, so be it. Many of your posts makes little sense to me in messaging or legibility. Maybe there would be less confusion if they were easier to understand and decipher what your point is?

[Deereyme66]

I don’t ‘have to’ explain the whataboutery but I will. It’s in the context of the juvenile subject title using ‘fwiend’ and you as a poster frequently criticising Blair and the current Labour Party led by Starmer being ‘Blairite’, and using an archive BBC piece to go out of your way to undermine the the credentials of the current Party (because you don’t like it) by pointing your finger and not explicitly, but implicitly, signalling ‘what about Blair, what about Blair?!’. For it to be ‘whataboutery’ it doesn’t necessarily need to follow directly on from another post or be linked to one. It’s the whole context. It would be a bit a bit simple in discourse otherwise.

[Deereyme66]

The OP is juvenile whataboutery in my opinion

1 user thanked author for this post.

TwoWrights

[Deereyme66]

juvenile whataboutery.

[Deereyme66]

Currently it’s Mick Lynch, supposedly feckless workers and anyone on big pensions.

[Deereyme66]

‘Of course, when Sir Keir’s PM there won’t be any homeless people.Just how ridiculous can you get.’

Not as ridiculous about missing the point of the OP, which was about Sunak’s ridiculous comment to a homeless person. Simple as that. Plus, no one has ever said there won’t be any homeless people if Labour were governing, I’ll wager the number of homeless will go down though.

1 user thanked author for this post.

TwoWrights

[Deereyme66]

A few Facebook replies from Simon a day or two ago didn’t suggest takeover was finished.

[Deereyme66]

64 wrote:

No,I thought that the “party of business” might actually protect bysinws when all the dust settled.I have despised thexEU since my teens and was glad to finally get out as wevecduscussedca myriad teams,even putting up with being labelled racist by lefty ,so called moderates.Blair using EU as an excuse to let manufacturing businesses die didn’t help my mood in my adult years

That barely makes any sense IMO.

[Deereyme66]

I didn’t say it was remiss of someone to realise they were wrong. Personally, I wish those that did vote leave stop complaining about the effects of it on their lives now. You voted to leave, deal with the consequences.

[Deereyme66]

And now you’re complaining frequently about it causing you problems???

[Deereyme66]

I thought you voted to leave the EU? Apologies if I’m mistaken.

[Deereyme66]

As a matter of fact there’s been a fair bit criticism about Labour past and present in the last few months from at least 3 posters. That aside, it’s not a prerequisite that posters should feel compelled to criticise Labour, particularly as they are not the party in power who have caused the country to become a poor basket case over the last 12 years. Bit like Swann this. It’s never their fault. But it absolutely is. In your case Bucks, it’s merely the Tories presiding over net zero and pensions that’s the problem with them. Bonkers.

[Deereyme66]

Like the sound of that JI. Particularly the trout. As I mentioned, mainly commercial fisheries for me, on sweetcorn more than maggot. No more trips for me till Spring. No close season on the commercials which gives more opportunities on the hoof, weather permitting of course.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Just Iron

[Deereyme66]

Yes, wish I could find time to go more often. Not so easy still working full time. Limited trips are restricted to commercial fisheries for me, but I miss a bit of river and canal fishing i used to do when I was much younger. Still, nice to get out for the odd trip, particularly early summer when they’re feeding well. Do you get to rivers and canals yourself JI?

[Deereyme66]

billpuntonsghost wrote:

When you say “morally superior “,who’s morals are you using?
Who decides which morals are the correct morals?
If humans decide it has always led to chaos and misery.

What are you saying here bpg? Should we let animals make the decisions? Genuinely baffled. You’ve obviously never met my daft dog.

[Deereyme66]

‘Well, then, why don’t you lot clear off to live in Germany or somewhere else in the EU.’

Okay Nige 👍 Attempts to make Remainers appear unpatriotic are so passe.

[Deereyme66]

‘Of course, the wonderful Germans would never do anything like that. Well, then, why don’t you lot clear off to live in Germany or somewhere else in the EU. After all, the EU isn’t racist so I’m sure they’ll happily take you; and if not just bung a few million euros in a brown bag and everything will be fine.’

Why the increasing strawmaning? Blimey.

[Author]

Posts