Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
You’ve got two strands of hair Siderite. Do you wonder where they came from? Eh? EH?!?!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Hilton did say they’d be registered pretty soon. That was only yesterday. A few weeks maybe?
Don’t take my last post personally JI. If you look back you will find my post was only 1 min after yours. Our posts must have crossed and I was probably typing a response to Westyorksiron when you posted yours. I’m all for ‘making SUFC great again’ just prefer to move away from the Trumpesque singling out, ridiculing and insulting posters, or questioning their actual names and motives. 64 makes good points about this in the wider sphere and I don’t think it should be ignored or dismissed as easily as it appears to be by some.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Rubbish. Don’t progress to more disinformation either. It won’t last long.
Agree with those points Westyorksiron. I’m more interested in engaging with posts like that in the future that raise sensible points rather than these stupid witch hunts regarding particular posters and attempting to find out posters real names and quietening doubters
4 users thanked author for this post.
Original for me but love Japan’s cover
No need for that I-A. He’s given you an explanation and it seems fair enough to me.
SLF cover for me.
Don’t believe Matty Cash is Ledley King for one second. More rumours!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Don’t know how it works with him and SUFC. I know of a few non league players at levels 8-10 who are on dual reg – they train with their bigger club and play for them primarily. They occasionally play for the club lower in a league or two lower and I assume that’s negotiated between both clubs and approved by the main club? I guess it all comes down to the agreement between both clubs?
August 24, 2023 at 6:12 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270264Just for clarity, because a few of you seem to be a bit confused; I’m all game for finding out things about Hilton and the club. Not remotely interested in finding out users actual names or their supposed agendas, like a poor episode of Scooby Doo. Cheers, need to get ready for a soiree later!
August 24, 2023 at 6:07 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270263The one in your head maybe?
August 24, 2023 at 5:30 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270258Calm down love
Lol, or they’ve just not logged on for a few hours I-A? It’s ‘Get IB and II / IE Day!’ folks! Bring your flaming torches!
August 24, 2023 at 5:22 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270253People with agendas moaning about people with agendas is the new ‘people moaning about moaning’. Oops, ‘jumpers for goalposts’, ‘at the end of the day…’
August 24, 2023 at 5:19 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270251Glad you cleared that up
Love a bit of hyperbole
August 24, 2023 at 4:32 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270241‘like every fan on this forum I’m very wary of him’
Have to say, I don’t see every fan on here being wary of him!
‘several horses arses peppering this site.’
What a way with words! But an image I can do without
August 24, 2023 at 2:44 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270229Each to their own IFA
August 24, 2023 at 1:14 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270212‘Take out the messenger’? Aye. On here, on Twitter and on Facebook; latest one just yesterday. If it’s not burner accounts it’s ‘get [insert dissenter name] day!’.
Nah, Afur & Tel innit!
August 24, 2023 at 12:21 pm in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270206It’s like the original Iron bru forum where I asked about club debt and a header popped up saying “I’m going to report you to the club”
it’s not as bad as that! Made me laugh though.
Now I know you really don’t do Facebook.
August 24, 2023 at 11:00 am in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270192I wouldn’t bother trying to convince him or anyone else. You knew you were there, so does Brassy, and I suspect numerous others. Just deflection from the bigger concerns that some can’t deal with being confronted with in La La Land.
1 user thanked author for this post.
August 24, 2023 at 10:09 am in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270179Whatever his / her name is, does it make a difference. Not like he’s called Peter or Dave is it? Though I can’t validate that!
August 24, 2023 at 9:45 am in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270175Do you check the CCJ site daily?
Good point AA, come on Andy have you a site monitoring fetish 🤔
Have you got empirical evidence that IBs real name is Andy, or shall we just wait and see?
August 24, 2023 at 9:43 am in reply to: 17/08/23 – County Court Judgement – £14,591.00 – Case No. K1QZ9Z77 #270174I think he does it hourly, AA
Have you got a link for that?
‘I’d rather see the money go towards paying off some of the creditors’
Hang on, serious question, what creditors and how many are ‘some’? Do you see the problem here? Not shit stirring, but we have been consistently and persistently told that money is not an issue, that proof of funds have been shown, etc. So what’s the score?
-
AuthorPosts

