Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
All the neo- Marxist globalists on here ( the usual suspects) are really on the side of WEF, Bill Gates (and the like) and the “ totalitarian “ elites,but they’re still stuck in their Labour v Tory position and so are blind to see what’s happening before their very eyes.
When we voted for Brexit I turned to my wife on that historic day and said”If you think the establishment will implement the wishes of the British people you are in for a terrible shock.” These has proven to be correct words.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Was the 3-3 game at Dagenham when it was torrential rain towards the end of the match ?
Bucksiron-“we should, indeed ,given Labour a chance to fix it.” 😂
The Tories and Labour are on the same page.The hidden agenda of the “great reset” is the worldview they both agree on,unfortunately.
Suppressing the truth is a daily battle for lots of people.
Heard he told people to bet on Scunny to lose- they told him they already had!
1 user thanked author for this post.
…” how morality is meaningless without Christianity.”
No,you’ve got it wrong!
Objective Morality proves that there is a Creator (God),not that it’s meaningless without Christianity.
You have to “steal “ from a Creator(God) worldview to make sense of your life.
If there is no God all morality is subjective ,murder might be “wrong” in your eyes but “right” in another persons , who decides in an atheistic worldview?
Objective morality proves there is a Creator ( God) and Christianity is true because of Christ proving He was God in human form .
YOU can’t live a truly atheistic lifestyle,you have to “steal” from the Christian worldview to make sense of your life. Think about it.So the word “invasion” shouldn’t be used because it spreads concern.
Just to be “politically correct” could you educate me on the correct words to use instead of “ this year ( and over the last few years)there has been an invasion of people illegally entering the country with record numbers being recorded”. I will use the correct words so it doesn’t spread concern because of these record numbers.Ad-hom attacks so satisfying.
Siderite ..” the people saying that there is an invasion of migrants and these are invaders mean it from the goodness of their own hearts”.
What??
I actually said “ the invasion of thousands of people illegally”.
Your words have not been said!!
Where do you get “ the people saying that there is an invasion of migrants and these are invaders” from??I can’t tell you how satisfying that last response by you was Deeryme66.
Where is the evidence for this not being tongue in cheek? But you are sceptical.
I agree we cannot say it was a joke ( tongue in cheek comment) with any accuracy,but the point of the post was to declare it was “overt racism”,when in fact in the not too distant past it would have been taken as British “ tongue in cheek “ humour.The agenda in our neo- Marxist critical theory times is too declare everyone a victim ,then intersectionality from that and so on.
“You can’t be seriously claiming that terms like the “British invasion” for music in the 60s is like this.The former was not said with malice,for one,while this is.”
This is said with malice? By who. When I say “ the invasion of thousands of people illegally” are you saying I say this with malice!!
“ One wonders if the woman’s response would have been different if the waiter had said he was Ukrainian?
Who knows! With the current news the tongue in cheek comment wouldn’t have worked if he declared he was Ukrainian and she may have remained silent.
But hey, she was probably one of those rich Tory voters who asks every waiter if they are here legally,like all the other overt racists that read the Mail.…” so terms like invasion and attacking foreign waiters is not on”.
I’ll start with the second part ,attacking foreign waiters is not on.You will not accept “ tongue in cheek” British humour by stating “ I think this interpretation is too generous”.Exactly,with your agenda you will not accept this interpretation ( by the way “attacking foreign waiters” is a hysterical statement for this incident)
The first part , in using “ invasion” as a description of the thousands of people trying to enter our country illegally is certainly acceptable.When the Beatles and other groups went to America it was called the “British invasion”. Now there are not a few groups but thousands of people trying to enter the country illegally you want people to stop using the word “ invasion”. You couldn’t make it up!..I understand 😉
“
“Are you defending that person?”
No,what I asked was “ If you hadn’t been a coward and you up for an embarrassing scene,what would you have said to her?”
The question was not answered.
Maybe it was“tongue in cheek” British humour ( with the current state of the invasion of illegal immigrants- especially from Albania)If you hadn’t been a coward and you were up for an embarrassing scene,what would you have said to her?
…probably,*** *** y** Tory **** *******( In a loving tone,obviously.)
Meat Loaf ..”Two out of three ain’t bad!”
…to kill their own child ?
When you put in your title “Genuine Christian” ,what do you mean?
Do you mean a regenerate Christian compared to an unregenerate Christian?Eddie Izzard- How can you vote for Labour when Starmer won’t even say “He is a man.”
…then again ,can I put you down to be the next Tory leader as well!😂
Can I put you down to be next Labour leader with you being so intelligent?😂
..can an adult human female have a penis?
Can a black person be racist?
…you?
Ah that line,usually used by?
The abuse directed at Nuttall reminds me of years gone past.
Brian Laws was abused by so- called fans earlier in his managerial career ( player manager at the time) at a game at Rochdale. Laws gave these yobs a taste of their own medicine and stood up to the abuse. These so called fans never forgot or moved on ( they continued their abuse of Laws even when the golden years were in full flow!) The old timers on here know who they are ,but their reply now would be “ don’t know what you’re talking about,guv.”2 users thanked author for this post.
I also stated ,the globalists with “there is no God” worldview so why not get rid of half the world’s population and have complete control of the rest- their view is there is no life after death ,so why not!
Hitler with the same “ unbiblical and no God” worldview wrote the book Mein Kampf- you only have to look at the misery and chaos that philosophical thought led to.
Karl Marx is another with ideas that led to untold millions of deaths and suffering
The new and past philosophical ideas all have unbiblical and “there is no God “philosophical thought,the outcome will always be the same. -
AuthorPosts