Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
goes without saying that Pat
Hilton confirmed to us that he has never paid Swann £20k a month in rent. He publicly offered £10k a month in an interview with
@aidanmccartney
and said it was likely double the market value but that’s as far as it got. Initial lease from Swann to DH was 1p a day. Sublease from DH to SUFC mirrors this, hence the 7p a week figure.1 user thanked author for this post.
of all the exemptions, I reckon this one fits best
g. sale of land on which a business is carried on, together with sale of that business as a going concern
(in such circumstances there would normally be payment separately for the business as a going
concern, e.g. the value of equipment, stock and goodwill)you would have voted for Trump?
I would add that sometimes we delete threads we believe to be true and still have no proof
who knows any more
they believe everything or at least follow everything he says ,like a cult
1 user thanked author for this post.
Good to see his law degree being of use, today he’s claiming the club are paying 20k a month rent
Max is a freelancer, he also writes right handed I believe
I’ll take it all in with a brew later
the only crowd funder we should have is to get £3m for the iron trust to buy GP?
2 users thanked author for this post.
clowns
can you point us towards the official account of events ? Mr Fer
I noticed some discrepancies between Max’s reports and those from the professional reporter who was also there.
I bet the discrepancy was positive for Davey several names, I also notice his 1st line was to have a pop at those he disagrees with rather than report ?
Journalist lol,was he being a journalist when he stole content from Bru for his book?1 user thanked author for this post.
Yes! quite right ,though you forgot those who agree with me
Anyone thinking a judge would call this yesterday was an idiot,there were those who thought we’d be kicked out and those who think Dave is god that thought a 1st hearing would go through this in a few minutes in court and throw Swann’s claim out .They were all wrong, then we have those that don’t care either way as long as they can tell people to shut up and somehow claim they were right to do so , they were also wrong.
Then they are those who just repeat facts that people try to wrongly lump in with some or all of the above ,they are right.
The last group are idiots, those who see facts and call them rumours
I would add, repeating what Swann or Hilton says is not repeating facts ,it’s repeating what they say ,which, may or may not be factMax has no credibility with me since he took part ,with Hilton and his cohorts,in the attack on this site which led to death threats and abuse to further his own publicity and that of his little video site .Still no apology from either Hilton or whatever he’s called today or anyone else who set the dogs on us. In fact he doubles down by calling people who call him out liars or trolls
It has a swipe thing that if I don’t read it back ,
“weird any no old sentence”
The above should say, writes any old sentenceI trust my OWN thoughts enough to express them in person, others have to use YouTube videos incessantly to try to express theirs.
Not their own, just something they agree the hell out of
I’d say it was for one of four reasons,
Matt is in Swann’s pocket,if it was about Swann
Matt wants to in in Hilton’s pocket like Smitho and the boys if it was about Hilton
I am operating double standards(although this one was nowt to do with me)
The trustI can confirm that in now way was it against the rules
Lucinda brings some fine emotion to this but ,she’s up against one in a line of the best duets ever so she misses out hereI never understood there 1st post
The problem those who use the term don’t know what it means
Andy Flounders is king
Had a perfectly legitimate post removed when asking IB to front up about the Southend owner on their fans forum, does he post there or not. Just thought I’d inform the forum that censorship appears to be returning to this board but only in a certain form.
You missed the bit where by you tried to put someone’s name on here , if you’d posted what you said above be and only that it would be still here.So be truthful in your whining. Theres reason we protect your identities, the abuse and death threats being chief among them.
4 users thanked author for this post.
People got libeled as Paedos and had death threats for spreading such rumours, hope Dave’s followers don’t see this, can you imagine their dilemma ?
1 user thanked author for this post.
there’s nothing to fear,I am sure there’s people wanting to watch it I just don’t. I am preferring non league grounds at the moment and I find a crowd of 60-100 more fun
The truth is people need to be presented with something to watch, I’d like to hope MPs don’t like Murdoch when snivelling around him ,it’s because they need coverage and this is the same
I have to say, I didn’t think much to the football I have seen from the women’s game so far. They are trying to play the right way though but it just misses a certain spark.that interest is in part driven by the BBCs licence fee being under constant pressure and women’s football being far more accessible pricewise for them. It’s still a big influence in the UK despite Tories trying to kill it. They give it equal billing which annoys in a way.
When I see “premier league scores” I am still surprised to see women’s football when I click on the link, especially as the women’s league is called the The FA Women’s Super250% more watched the Men’s Euro final,and in 2022 the same amount 12.6m watched LFC Vs Real on BT in the champions league final it has a long way to go bearing in mind it was on 2 free to air channels
-
AuthorPosts