Forum Replies Created
-
‘With a good board of directors, it will avoid another case where one man can run up a vast debt, with his wreckless spending and then transfer the debt to the club and transfer the clubs assets to himself’.
Hope so. Do you know what their terms of reference are and if they have voting rights at meetings? Be interested to know what their governance rights are.
1 user thanked author for this post.
No offence, but I take any comments you make about work matters / employees with a large pinch of salt.
1 user thanked author for this post.
You sound like a conspiracy theorist. You were rightly critical at the time of Swann, but so were many others, whilst others chose to ignore it. Regardless, there’s a huge irony in this point.
Many others??? who exactly, there were a couple of us who called out Swann from day one, from speaking to Trinity supporters who had experience of him running their club, hard evidence, most the fans didn’t start wanting Swann out until we started plummeting down the leagues.
There is no Irony involved at all, I have no hard evidence to give me concern about Hilton, I have spoken to Ilkeston fans who had nothing but praise for him, I have also spoken to him and found him open and genuine. I am not going to judge him on rumours made up from people who don’t even support the club but claim to be in the know.
I’m as bored of seeing posts like the above as you probably are me and others who are posting things you don’t want to see. I’m also bored of critiquing posts with comments about Trinity and ilkeston fans and ‘told you so’ remarks. Looks like we’ll have to beg to differ. The difference is I don’t mind if you keep posting. You seem to have an issue with me and certain others posting what we think. Your problem, not mine.
1 user thanked author for this post.
‘He took on a complete and utter shit show from that arsehole’
A ‘shitshow’. Really? Across all departments? Is that not a sweeping generalisation? I’ve no doubt some areas would have been, but unless you work there, and I assume you don’t, what makes you such an expert? No one’s denying savings needed to be made mind.
‘who most of you now slating Hilton worshipped for such a long time before waking up to the truth.’
You sound like a conspiracy theorist. You were rightly critical at the time of Swann, but so were many others, whilst others chose to ignore it. Regardless, there’s a huge irony in this point.
‘Let’s be very clear the position this club is in is nothing to do with Hilton, he is trying to sort the mess out left behind and it cannot all be done straight away.
It is Hilton’s responsibility now and comments regarding off field matters isn’t stopping him in any way shape or form.
‘None of you know what the CCJ relates too even those of you like SNOT who claims to have “inside” information on everything at the club but in reality knows sod all and doesn’t even attend games and has been proven to be a liar on this site.’
Agreed, no one seems to know what it relates to but as some of us are pointing out, it’s about more than that. It’s about what other debts there may be, others who are not bring paid, etc.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Cannot believe anyone would question WGs astute match assessments. Shocking.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Savings, cost cutting and cutting cloth shouldn’t come with not paying what you owe and a ‘whatevs’ attitude IMO. False economy and unsustainable. Though people are perfectly entitled to stick their heads in the sand and hope the suns still shining. Evidence shows that serves no club well
3 users thanked author for this post.
With respect, with the exception of a few, no one is not giving Hilton a chance. Supporters are entitled to express opinions about off field matters and will continue to do so, whether you want them to or not. I don’t agree with the ‘shut up and butt out’ ethos and suspect many others don’t either
3 users thanked author for this post.
Harsh IMO
1 user thanked author for this post.
