Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
I’d say he’s just joining the dots between Whitehall going down injured against FGR (with what looked like the same knee problem as last season) and then bringing in Sellars-Fleming on a one month loan.
If Whitehall is out then as said above surely we play Dec through the middle and not completely ruin our game by lumping it to Beck.
One thing that this game highlighted is that it is abundantly clear that Beck should be nowhere near a football pitch. Can’t run, can’t beat 18 year olds in the air, outmuscled by 18 year olds, just generally can’t keep up with play!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Have a feeling it’s bad news regarding the Whitehall injury and he’s being brought in as cover.
Who’s Mason?
He was brilliant and kept us in the game, especially the first half. Deserved chants of “Rory Rory Watson” at multiple points throughout the game. Clearly distraught at the end, being consoled by FGR players which I thought was a nice touch on their part. If he didn’t fumble that at the end it probably would have been the best goalkeeping performance I’ve seen since his heroics at home vs Carlisle in 2020.
I definitely had a grumble when we brought him back but he’s looked the part so far and long may it continue.
2 users thanked author for this post.
Chadwick got an opportunity at Eastleigh and didn’t really do anything of note.
Howe hasn’t completed a full game yet. Does he really run himself completely into the ground, or is it his just his GPS telling the management team “that’s enough running for you, off the pitch you come?” It does seem like we make substitutions for the sake of it half the time.
Re: Beck. Have to agree…he just doesn’t get anywhere near anything and offers virtually nothing. To think we paid actual money for him as well.
Speaking to a FG fan after the game, he was ecstatic with the result, said we had the game won…clearly wasn’t aware of our nasty habit of conceding late goals from high balls into the box!
Such a good performance from him up until the final seconds of the game. Everyone on the terrace knew exactly what was about to happen as soon as Carlton played that hospital pass and they got a free kick. Back post again olé olé!
Scandalous that Starbuck and Horton are still suspended.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Remember going to Forest Green and seeing two absolute worldies in the same game from Abo Eisa and Alex Gilliead…more of the same this weekend please!
And if on that day Wealdstone need to win with a 2 or more goal margin to avoid relegation and are winning 2-0…just walk off the pitch and condemn them to a 0-0 win.
Here’s a working link to their rulebook.
https://www.ncefl.org.uk/league/rules/downloads/NCEL_League_Rules_2025-26.pdf
Nothing in there about having to have a certain reason for applying rule 8.38. Just walk off the pitch if you’re losing.
“In the event of a match being abandoned due to the conduct of one Club or its members or supporters, the Board has the power to order that either: (a) the original match stands as a completed match, (b) the match is replayed (and the terms upon which the match is replayed), or (c) the match is not replayed, and to award either one or three points to the Club not at fault. The Board cannot levy a financial penalty due to the conduct of a Club.”
Suggests they would have been well within their “rules” to award us a 2-1 win as a “completed match”.
3 users thanked author for this post.
Really struggling to get my head around the goals being wiped. Surely it sets the precedent that if you’re losing towards the end of a game you just walk off the pitch and refuse to play. You’ll still get zero points but will be as if you never conceded.
Or a final game showdown between two teams vying for promotion/playoff spot/safety…one team needs to beat the other by 2 goals and are 5-0 up…nah just walk off the pitch.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Replaying the Eastleigh game – correct decision.
Getting 3 points for Wealdstone – correct decision.
BUT
Wiping off the goals scored/conceded is a mad decision! We’ve effectively been punished whilst Wealdstone have benefited. If it were UEFA we would have received a 3-0 victory similar to Romania vs Kosovo when the Kosovo players walked off the pitch and refused to play. Obviously the NL seems things differently.
At the end of the season if we’re about to get relegated or drop out of the playoffs on goal difference you just walk off the pitch and refuse to play…job done. Absolutely bonkers!
5 users thanked author for this post.
You can make 5 substitutions but only using 3 substitution occurrences. They made their 3, therefore couldn’t make any more.
The National League conveniently left our game out of their weekly round-up.
https://www.thenationalleague.org.uk/what-happened-across-the-national-league-on-saturd-83993
The League managed to order the replay of the Buxton game 2 days after the game was abandoned. The only reason I see any need for this decision to take longer is because they’ll want (need!) to issue Wealdstone with some sort of punishment…not just give us the points.
But saying that we still haven’t heard anything regarding the Eastleigh abandonment so I won’t be holding my breath for a decision to be made any time soon.
Can’t see any other outcome than us getting the points. The FA rules are pretty clear on this:
“In all cases where the Management Committee are satisfied that a Match was abandoned owing to the conduct of one Team or its Club member(s) they shall award the points for the Match to the opponent.”
Wealdstone were instructed by the referee (after consulting with the PGMOL) to complete the game. They refused. Points to us.
2 users thanked author for this post.
I remember seeing Eduardo’s foot quite literally hanging off his leg when it was broken in a Premier League game vs Birmingham. He was stretchered off and taken to hospital. Game continued. Wealdstone playing the “mental health” card is a sign of the times I guess.
Agree with all of that. The League need to make a decision pronto as both Starbuck and Horton should have served their suspensions today. If we go to Forest Green next weekend still not knowing the official outcome then they’re both going to have to sit out AGAIN!
The league need to nip this in the bud with a tough punishment for wealdstone.
Absolutely. 2-1 down and had already made all of their substitutions so cried off!
Well, when the league finally gets round to considering our suspended games then if they decide the Eastleigh game must be replayed , then Wealdstone will almost certainly argue that today’s should be as well. You could not make this shit up!
Completely different scenario to the Eastleigh game. The referee made the decision to abandon that game, and rightly so. This game was abandoned solely because Wealdstone refused to play. Forfeit game, 3-0 win incoming.
Different organisation (and we know how shambolic the National League are) but similar to when Romania were awarded a 3-0 win versus Kosovo because Kosovo players refused to play after receiving abuse from the crowd.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Butler confirmed on radio that the ref and the League instructed that the game must continue. Wealdstone refused “because they weren’t in the right frame of mind”.
All because of a shoulder injury as well…what a farce!
Well there you have it. Butler confirmed on radio that the ref and League wanted the game to continue and Wealdstone refused to play on. Anything other than an incoming 3-0 win will be absolutely ludicrous!
1 user thanked author for this post.
Wealdstone players pretty much down the tunnel before they even checked on their player…manager in the refs ear. They clearly didn’t want to play. Ridiculous!
Exactly. How can the National League make a decision and not the referee? Players have literally snapped their legs in half during games, get stretchered off, go to hospital, game continues. Tuesday night was completely different with their guy having a convulsion and clearly wasn’t able to be moved, with an ambulance brought onto the pitch.
So why has this game been abandoned!?
Don’t think you’re being cynical at all, Wealdstone clearly trying every tactic in the book to get the game abandoned. With Butler saying it’s not the refs decision to abandon the game surely that suggests a 3-0 win is incoming?
Game abandoned, wtf!? Butler saying on the mic that it wasn’t the referees decision? Surely that suggests Wealdstone refusing to come back out and a 3-0 win then?
Bargain bucket.
-
AuthorPosts